I think a big part is never having used the "privacy muscle", and atm its atrophied. I was like that before taking privacy seriously
Yeah absolutely. My friend asked if i wanted to go to a palestine protest... over sms. Told him I wont talk about politiical activity over insecure means. On his part he did agree at least... but then refused to download signal
Ah makes sense. Thanks
I'm stupid what does zero nines uptime mean?
I can blame both, with more weighting to the billionaires of course. Only thing I suppose is that blaming boomers is generalising too much. Its a subset of boomers who vote to protect their exponentially increasing property values
If you can't see the code (closed source) then treat it as they're lying and it isn't end to end encrypted
What a silly thing to say. No need to shame men for taking these pills. I for one love that there are hair regrowth pills since its gonna help a lot with my mtf transition. Should they stop development into these pills just because there are some dicks in the whitehouse?
Yeah i see that.
im fine if the gov knowing i went to that protest. Im proud to attach my face to it. However comms over sms becomes an issue when we decide to go to an illegal protest, which will become more and more of an issue over the next decade, at least in my country.
So by establishing the general rule of secure communications for political activism, i hopefully avoid a friend making the blunder of sending a photo/talking about a protest that was explicitely said to be illegal and punishable by a fine or worse.