current

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Coal (anything) doesn’t "contain" energy. We can transform some things, and some transformations produce energy in some form or another.

Akstchually energy is a property of matter, or matter is a property of energy, whatever πŸ€“ but your point still stands

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

The US gets 1/5 of its power from nuclear energy, and produces 2,000 metric tons of nuclear waste per year – only enough to fill about half of the volume of an olympic-sized swimming pool (and about the same weight as 10 wind turbines).

Only 3% of all of that waste is actually long-lived and highly radioactive, potentially requiring isolation from the environment. In France, this number goes down to 0.2% due to fuel being reprocessed.

Taking that into consideration, that means it would take about 2/3 of a century for the US to produce enough dangerous nuclear waste to fill this pool completely. And it can still be way more efficient.

Nuclear produces negligible amounts of actual waste for the amount of energy it gives us. The problems with nuclear aren't at all the waste, rather it's the current highly used methods that are used to harvest the fuel (slave labour and unsafe, dirty, destructive drilling). Very similar problems faced with, say, lithium and cobalt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

bang should be a schedule 1 drug, it's the worst thing i can imagine putting in your body lmao

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Retirement being supported through taxes rather than individuals choosing to save would be far better. It's wealth based so people who can afford to save for retirement are already doing it by default, and people who make an egregious amount of money are taxed so those who can't afford to save for retirement aren't left to rot.

Same concept as other social services, really. Having the means for basic survival should be guaranteed by society, especially for people who can't support themselves.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

william taft died in a bathtub due to his terrible health, a month after resigning from the supreme court.

his health had been mentally and physically declining for about a decade before that point, but despite that he insisted on staying as a justice on the supreme court the entire time because he viewed hoover as too progressive and was paranoid he'd be replaced by a dirty commie. so he stayed a supreme court justice and caused a lot of problems by having increasingly worse memory and having a worse and worse ability to actually attend his job.

he was also the president before ww1 started, he lost re-election because teddy roosevelt (the person who helped get him elected in the first place) no longer viewed him as a suitable president and ran against him as a 3rd party candidate.

also, taft's son was the co-sponsor of the taft-hartley act of 1947, which took away many worker's rights and crippled unions in the united states, criminalizing things like solidarity strikes (what's happening in sweden with tesla now), wildcat strikes (striking without union leader approval), jurisdictional strikes, and most forms of picketing. ;)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

bottom left has some scary scenes ngl, i'll go with him

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

"Hello, losers"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

damn guess every speaker of multiple english dialects sound like idiots

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

liberal propoganda

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I literally stated it in the comment. It's clear I was talking about providing kids the food they need to develop properly and not suffer from malnutrition.

It's not about "ham sandwich worse than nothing" it's about the fact that you're taking people's shock and complaints, and immediately going to use these "ham sandwiches" to deflect from the issue of kids' lunch debt being legal in the first place. And many of your comments under this post are just "actually it's not technically the child's debt". You're presenting parents not sending kids in with barely-meals as the problem.

The issue to focus on isn't "the parents". The blame often isn't even on parents. The blame is on conservatives, on our society, on people who rail against the basic welfare that every civilized, developed, first-world country has.

As far as everyone else is concerned, you're just trying to make excuses for the right causing our country's dysfunction, and you're trying to defend the existence of school lunch debt by using parents as a scapegoat and saying they're the ones that really cause this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm pretty sure the only difference would be that people with a jailbroken switch can extract prod.keys from it. But afaik most of the tools people made to assist with that got obliterated so I don't think it's worth doing for most people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

sorry but a ham sandwich and an apple aren't even close to enough to be an apt meal for a child, for many kids school lunch is the most nutrition they get in a day and ripping that away from them is evil. the advice in your comment is terrible.

sliced meats sold in the US generally have EXTRAORDINARILY little nutrition, and are pretty expensive, while at the same time having a fuck ton of salt stuffed into them both for flavour and as preservatives. all you're doing with a ham sandwich is wasting money to give your kids malnutrition and high blood pressure. sliced cheeses are less bad but they're mostly salt and saturated fats still – and are still very little nutrition compared to the cost.

the most nutritious thing is the bread, but the most commonly bought bread slices are mostly just grains other than fiber, which while not necessarily a problem is still NOT something that can compensate for the lack of nutrition in the meal.

fruits are great and all but they're only one part of our diets, it can be really difficult both money and time wise to do everything else. schools shouldn't be ADDING on to that difficulty, they should be helping families with it instead.

but instead of that, our country is filled with people like you who choose to deflect from the issue of a dysfunctional social welfare system by pretending it'd be manageable if only it weren't for those bad parents. i agree that most parents don't deserve their kids, but it's not always in their control, and regardless of that, whether or not a kid won the birth lottery is completely irrelevant to it – we should guarantee that ALL kids can, without shame and without punishment, get the food that they need to develop properly.

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί