[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 12 points 1 week ago

In an ideal world, they would get 0 sales.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This comment only makes sense if you disregard entirely detection by satellite image.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

Wouldn't that make sense? Radars can detect an object, but the precise type would require more precision, no?

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago

Thanks! It was Madō King Granzört!

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 12 points 1 month ago

So, not the attackers, but the one attacked?

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 9 points 2 months ago

People say this but, if advertising didn't work, companies would have stopped paying for ads long time ago. It works for them, we view ads and then we are willing to pay more for a product that is worth less; it's this simple.

The only solution for us is to avoid ads at all cost.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 7 points 5 months ago

A period (already a small character) + a space is sufficient to separate sentences.

Also, if there are more than one space together, it's hard to count them. That is, the more spaces you keep together, the harder it gets to know whether you've put the correct number of spaces.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago

If all the people they killed come back alive and they're still banned, all the killing they did wasn't the reason for the ban.

...but they won't come back.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 7 points 9 months ago

I've been following this rule for about a good decade now. It doesn't apply only to Netflix series.

The are many series to watch; no point in starting to watch one without any guarantee that the series will keep consistent good ratings until the finale.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 8 points 11 months ago

Good. However, if the intent is to discourage driving in central London, the penalty should not be an fixed rate for each vehicle. It should be a dynamic rate based on how much the people in the car earn. Otherwise you are only displacing people with low salary while freeing the roads for the rich that don't care to pay £30.

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago

In the video, the guy claims it's the same device, with the same hardware, just the color is different. Do you think the guy got it wrong? Or do you think Lenovo made different variants of those devices?

[-] cristian64@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago

It's not unreasonable, but if after taxing 3rd and 4th homes (etc.) to oblivion the issue persists, then also second homes should be taxed high. I truly believe that extreme would not be needed once it's made humanely forbidden to own multiple homes without intention of ever living in them.

Worth adding that it should not be the number of homes what should be taxed, but based on the market value of those properties.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

cristian64

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago