bloopinator

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ultimately it’s this unfounded faith that arbitrary centralized players (media, social media, government, whatever) wouldn’t adhere to, or enforce, any incorrect doctrine of truth

Everyone on earth (Especially in America) should be forced to understand this. Corporations in America are legally obligated to act in the interest of their shareholders. Ethics don't fucking matter to them unless a law says they have to, and as we established, most of our laws regulating corporations aren't even being enforced in the first place.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

I saw a lot of progressives turning into free market libertarians as soon as social media started censoring right wing opinions. Suddenly all I could see was “They’re a private company, they can do what they want!”

Couldn't have said it better myself. The internet has essentially been in a wild west era since it was created, as the government has pretty much no laws or court decisions saying what information social companies can and can't regulate. On top of that we're in an era where the SEC happily rubber stamps every corporate merger under the sun. Now we're seeing the consequences of that as a majority of information on the internet is controlled by a handful of companies. And on top of that, even if you want to make your "alternative" platform, that's incredibly hard to do since services like web hosting and payment processing are also controlled by a handful of corporations.

Most major corporations have no business acquiring any other companies, and on top of that they need to be broken up. Just thinking of a few, Amazon owning Amazon shopping, AWS, Twitch, Ring, IMDb, and a fucking satellite internet company is ridiculous. The finance, energy, defense/aerospace, pharmaceutical/healthcare, and so many other industries are all guilty of this. Libertarians couldn't be more right about one thing, competition benefits consumers, but for some reason the only thing US republicans and democrats can agree on is that we should never enforce anti-trust laws. And internet leftists, the people who you'd figure would be all for corporations being broken up, are silent on the issue. It's infuriating to watch.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Realistically either a federal court needs to step in or some sort of legislation needs to be passed/updated regarding speech on the internet. A handful of private companies control a huge amount of public communication on the internet. Essentially the internet is the "modern town square" and if you get deplatformed from Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter, your ability to communicate is massively impacted. Unless you're already an established name by the time you get deplatformed (Like Trump or Alex Jones), being deplatformed basically makes it impossible to have a voice online.

People don't care for now because the only people being deplatformed are "right wing extremists" but as time passes the definition for what is and isn't acceptable on major sites will keep getting more and more strict. Even in the beginning it was a pretty grey area where these private companies were removing "misinformation" and citing government entities as the "correct" source. And shortly after the Biden administration became known to work directly with companies like Facebook to remove what they consider harmful information. At what point do we cross the line from "private companies doing what they want" to "the government directing private companies to remove information that hurts them"? For all the people who support these companies censoring topics under the direction of the Biden administration, how will you feel when the next Republican administration does it?

I unfortunately don't see a way this ends that benefits Americans. Both parties have shown that they want to control speech/information on the internet, since 2019 it's not only become tolerated, but actually expected. And for the first time ever a majority of Americans support the US government restricting speech online. That scares the shit out of me personally. Congress isn't going to do shit, the FCC isn't gonna do shit, and the supreme court certainly isn't gonna do shit. I don't want to imagine how the internet is gonna look in 10 years.

We should have never allowed it to get to this point. The endless mergers of tech and media companies that resulted in a handful of companies effectively controlling the internet should have caused riots in the streets. The second companies started "fact checking" posts and removing what they consider false information should have set off tons of alarm bells. And the second the US government started directing tech companies toward posts they needed to take down there should have been riots in the streets. But nobody seems to care because we're all too busy defending powerful corporations and an authoritarian government because apparently authoritarianism isn't bad when it only hurts your political opponents.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In 2020-2021 the line "they're a private company and can choose what speech they host on their platform" was thrown around a lot to defend pre-Musk Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and loads of other social media sites.

Disney is adored by many for "standing up to DeSantis" and doing lots of inclusiveness pandering in their media. People seem to instantly forget that a corporation is literally evil the second some people get wound up over a black mermaid.

A really old meme would be the anti-capitalist who owns an iPhone and $2000 MacBook.

Lots of internet techies are excited about Microsoft acquiring Activision just because it means new video games will hit PC and Xbox quicker.

Speaking of Microsoft, while Bill Gates has become more controversial in recent years, he still has lots of people who love him for his philanthropy while nicely glossing over some of the sketchy stuff he's done like his association with Jeffery Epstein and how he has recently become the largest landowner in the US.

I'd say the defending of corporate censorship and defending giant corporations that support certain social issues would be the two most glaring offenders.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This place is lame because it’s somehow even more obsessed with politics than Reddit. It’s draining to go to a social media site and constantly be subjected to negative headlines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Based on two comments I made do you truly think I’m “biased toward the Republican side” or are you just assuming that because you automatically assume anyone who disagrees with Democrats on certain issues is a Republican sympathizer?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

/r/antiwork, /r/murderedbyAOC, /r/leopardsatemyface, /r/politicalhumor, /r/blackpeopletwitter, etc. I could go on.

What’s the biggest “right wing echo chamber” on Reddit? /r/conservative has just barely over 1M subscribers, which puts it at a fraction of the size of those subs mentioned above.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can’t actually be serious can you?

Reddit back in the early 2010s was infamous for worshipping Ron Paul. In the early and mid-2010s there were literally subreddits dedicated to racism. It was controversial in the 2010s to ban or censor anything, meanwhile today all of the big subreddits are run by a handful of mods who will ban anyone who says something they don’t like, or even ban people automatically if they comment in a sub they don’t like.

If you think Reddit is somehow more right-leaning today than in the 2010s, I think that might just mean that you became far more left-leaning since then and everything else looks right-leaning in comparison.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah but Reddit admins are more than happy to remove mods if they don’t like them.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is there really anything to say there that everyone in this comment thread would be surprised by?

Republicans care too much about culture war BS

Republicans are blatantly wrong on the issue of abortion, and it’s actually baffling that they continue to oppose abortion even though it’s going to cost them elections

Environment. Need I say more?

Republicans are guilty of supporting giant corporations and serving corporate interests just as much as democrats. The only reason I don’t say they’re more guilty than Democrats is because companies that I consider to be some of the most monopolistic and controlling are tech and media companies that get much more support from democrats. I consider it a tie until one party either blocks a corporate merger or breaks up a monopoly.

I touched on Democrats being creepily authoritarian regarding speech, but of course Republicans are just as eager to censor when they have the opportunity as well.

I could go on, but these are the glaring issues I can think of that immediately come to mind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always find it funny (albeit in a depressing way) when people on the left act like anything short of totally open borders is white supremacy.

Wanna talk about ethnostates? Check out the demographics and immigration policies for countries like Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Iceland. Wanna talk about racism? Ask the average naturalized immigrant how they feel about illegal immigration.

Supporting more secured borders isn’t racist. The reality is that the American government should prioritize the interests of its own citizens before prioritizing the interests of people from other countries. It drives me up the walls to see how much support our government provides to refugees when meanwhile our own cities are struggling, most often in predominately black areas. Yes it’s a slight false dichotomy to act like we can’t support refugees while also improving our inner cities, but the reality is that we usually fail to do both as they’re often competing interests.

Is it really “supporting a white ethnostate” to say I’d rather have our country let in more immigrants with college degrees or at least a willingness to work over a bunch of people who have zero desire to integrate or even work.

“Progress” doesn’t mean trying to increase the population of our cities and diversity as much as possible even if it means bringing in millions of people who will rely on the government to survive, refuse to integrate into American society, and are the literal opposite of progressive. “Progress” means working to improve the lives of the people we have already living here, regardless of their ethnic background. And currently our immigration policy isn’t accomplishing that.

view more: next ›