Ah, I see. I use htop as a task manager.
berg
joined 1 year ago
How do you check what is eating up all your memory/cpu?
Yeah, maybe a bit of hyperbole on my part as well. Have a good Saturday evening!
This changed my habitual way of working with browsers for the better, can't recommend it enough. I'm using Sidebery though, not sure of the differences, but I really like its snapshot feature.
Ahh, I only meant to say that I might be living in the past. I thought the bloatware came from Samsung since what I heard on the street matched my experience. Maybe it's time to bury that hatchet though.
To be fair it wasn't a big issue. It was just like five apps that I were stuck with. But back in the days with less memory overall it really grinded my gears. These days I'm not sure I'd even notice.
Experience, to be fair though I last owned one 3+ years ago and that one was 3 ish years old.
After four years there are no more security updates coming from OnePlus, unless someone started doing the work themselves. This is the only reason I updated my last phone.
No security updates though.
Why wouldn't you recommend OnePlus though? I have a 9 pro which I enjoy. I really don't miss the Samsung's bloatware.
What are you doing here? It's not growing now is it? You see, it has to grow! The factory MUST grow!
I guess I take for granted that extended time spent in the game contributes more to the subjective value. Otherwise, why play? Of course there are a plethora of reasons to keep playing. But if we disregard that for now.
There are edge cases. E.g. a lovely small title that isn't replayable and barely three hours long. That one could bring the average up a bit, depending on the price. But I'm not asking for a universal rule, rather where the ratio starts to hurt subjectively for people.
Or well, I guess what I really wanted to know is how people compare the price of games to other recreational joys. Especially considering the timespan of the compared activities. Though maybe a bit poorly phrased. :)
This wasn't what you asked for, but I have to add it in here: I switched to YouTube music because I was told the shuffle actually was random there. From my experience the past couple of months it seems to be the case, at the very least it's better. But discovering new music (without putting in much effort) has been harder. Their playlist sorting is non-existent (you're stuck with alphabetic order, no folders). And for some idiotic reason the playlists are shared with YouTube... Everything with it, except for its working shuffle, is horrendous.
How the fuck can Spotify just not have a true fucking random shuffle, it's so annoying! It does everything else fairly well, but I'm not switching back to starting a playlist of 8+ hrs and getting a recognizable pattern depending on what I skip and don't. Or whatever goddamn algorithm they think is better than /dev/urandom.
This gave me hope for a while, but I've now given up: https://community.spotify.com/t5/Live-Ideas/All-Platforms-Option-to-have-a-true-shuffle/idi-p/4880594/page/103#comments