abfarid

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's how Google always worked, btw. But there is one obvious benefit to showing the original URL before you click it, you can hover it to see where the link actually leads before they hijack the click.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Uses Too Many Big Words

Contention

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (12 children)

How can one be chronologically disappointed? Did you mean "chronically"?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So she wants to go to jail if she wakes up with a headache?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I have 1GB/m and rarely use half of it. I just don't watch YT when I'm outside. And it's plenty for looking at beans on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I love both of the hosts. Wish they just switched to something else instead of canceling completely. Could've done regular science news.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

It was obviously sarcasm with that 100ths precision rating.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Your mom ends in butt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not criticizing the screens, they are ok and I loved my Pebble Time Steel until the battery swelled and popped off the screen. I'm just saying that calling these e-paper is a deceptive marketing strategy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

From the Verge article:

The first watch that Migicovsky and Core plan to ship is called the Core 2 Duo (not to be confused with the old Intel processor), which Migicovsky says will cost $149 and will ship in July. [...] It has the exact same black-and-white e-paper display as the old Pebble 2 (technically a transflective LCD, if you’re curious)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn't a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it's not "categorically" wrong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›