VasovagalSyncope

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is almost verbatim the same argument they use against piracy saying if people can pirate "no one buys any disks from the store"

Do you understand the different conext of wanting something to be profitable vs wanting people to know you made the thing you worked to create?

This is i think a core separation on the issue, and speaks to how little empathy the AI shovelers have for the tools they use trained on the hard work of real human beings.

I'm not taking credit for it, maybe some people do, but it's a strawman argument to say everyone does.

So who are these people crediting when the image they asked to be generated is using art that isn't credited?

People who make a moral panic about forms of piracy are basically screaming "Think of the children" as far as I'm concerned.

Spoken like someone who hasn't created art great enough that they want their name on it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I'd vote for her

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's ultimately trying to justify passing off the work of others as their own by obfiscating the way in which it's done.

It's not worth creating your own art if an AI is just going to rip your style and take credit the second you post it.

I often find the people who make excuses for AI art theft have never taken the days to make a piece of art that you upload to a community just to see others passing off your work as their own.

It's been proven the artists used in the training data can be identified by the art the AI generates. As well as with generted text. It doesn't copy pixel for pixel or word for word, but it copys identifiable techniques and prose.

I wouldn't have as much of a problem with it if every artist agreed for their works to be used, but these bots just scraped the open internet and took everything they could find and that's the training data.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, aknowledging reality isn't stupid

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

All AI art is trained on the work of real artists who didn't give consent for these programs to copy their work.

If society thought people copying parts of other artists work was stealing before AI we should treat AI art as stealing because it copys parts of artists work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's worth aknowledging that gathering will never do anything.

We have to do SOMETHING with the numbers.

If they don't voluntarily step down we need to use our numbers to physically stop them.

This is engaging with reality.

Voting for another Neoliberal will not fix any problems. We already learned this lesson in 2016 and 2024

It's time for leftist leadership

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

TBF nobody has ever voted their way out of fascism

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You're absolutely right.

This is just something we will tell ourselves to cope with our spiraling quality of life.

There's enough existing housing and resources for the vast majority of people to live off a single income.

Wealth inequality keeps all that excess under the control of less than 4000 billionaires that now own most wealth that exists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

We are.

Join us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I must have missed the part where the DNC ran a non Neoliberal canidate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

And he will still be in power afterwards.

We have to more than hold signs

view more: next ›