[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago

She's also a shite actress

1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's not about the specific geopolitics of Ukraine/Russia/China/Israel/anything... it's about the unsustainability of the economic system.

The capitalist countries aren't turning back from immiserating their people. They're all-in on a model of massive wealth inequality, where the few own the houses, land, and other wealth, and the common man is in debt and is squeezed for rent. U.S. consumer confidence is at a 12-year low because the common man cannot afford things.

If people can't afford things but you want them to buy things, there is one capitalist solution: put them into consumer debt like credit-card-debt. But that's also maxed out, it can't be pushed further.

It's heading toward crisis. Pursing an unsustainable path is synonymous with heading towards a catastrophe.

The correct solution to this crisis is a leftist movement. But the left is disorganised and disempowered by oppression&propaganda. There's no left in capitalist countries, not an effective one.

(Same logic applies to the environmental crisis as well as the economic one.)

The welfare state was established by Clement Attlee after WW2 – an example of how a catastophe/worldwar can be the shock required to get the ruling class to come to their senses and change the economic system.

Something's gotta give, simply put. People have been pushed to the brink and it can't go on like this.

That implies some sort of crisis/catastrophic failure of the system. That doesn't have to necessarily be a world war, but it fits the bill, plus all of the pieces are in place with geopolitical tensions and militarisation.

The capitalist rulers can try to take/destroy China and Russia to fight the collapse of their wealth (I'm agnostic on the specific alliances). Destroying fixed capital with bombs is one way of resetting the hoarding of wealth.

2
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

that's the post

1
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
37
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
39
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8
wut (streamff.live)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
44
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Explain the bookclub: We are reading Volumes 1, 2, and 3 in one year and discussing it in weekly threads. (Volume IV, often published under the title Theories of Surplus Value, will not be included in this particular reading club, but comrades are encouraged to do other solo and collaborative reading.) This bookclub will repeat yearly.

I'll post the readings at the start of each week and @mention anybody interested. Let me know if you want to be added or removed.


Just joining us? You can use the archives below to help you reading up to where the group is. There is another reading group on a different schedule at https://lemmygrad.ml/c/genzhou (federated at [email protected] ) which may fit your schedule better. The idea is for the bookclub to repeat annually, so there's always next year.

Archives: Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26Week 27Week 28Week 29Week 30Week 31Week 32Week 33Week 34Week 35Week 36Week 37Week 38Week 39Week 40Week 41Week 42Week 43Week 44Week 45Week 46Week 47Week 48Week 49 – Week 50Week 51


Week 52 – From Volume III, Chapter 51, Chapter 52, and Engels' supplement

Chapter 51 is called 'Distribution Relations and Production Relations'

Chapter 52 is called 'Classes'

Then Engels' supplement has two parts, called 'The Law of Value and Rate of Profit' and 'The Stock Exchange'


https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/index.htm


Discuss the week's reading in the comments

[-] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago

Luigi Mangioni

4
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

They were both undefeated at their first meeting in May: Usyk won.

Undercard

Johnny Fisher vs Dave Allen

Serhii Bohachuk vs Ishmael Davis

Peter McGrail vs Rhys Edwards

Isaac Lowe vs Lee McGregor

Daniel Lapin vs Dylan Colin

Moses Itauma vs Demsey McKean

Andrii Novytskyi vs Edgar Ramirez

Mohammed Alakel vs Joshua Ocampo

29
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago

brags about not starting any wars

He actually did start a war in Niger the press just didn't report on it

[-] [email protected] 49 points 10 months ago

I sorta love the idea.

Imagine having some idyllic, healing forest available to you when the world gets to be too much. With mellow music, birdsong, activities, etc.

But the idea is what I love. I don't have any faith in the execution.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 10 months ago

Capitalists defending capitalism say it rewards hard work.

Capitalists giving financial advice say avoid labour, get passive income.

[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago

They have Radio Free Asia as a greenlisted reliable source here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources

So anything on Radio Free Asia is considered verified by Wikipedia's standards.

Radio Free Asia is openly a branch of the USA's government. It was created by Bill Clinton's government.

Ctrl+F Radio Free Asia on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China gives 32 results

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

And when I say journalism, I’m not talking about “democracy dying in darkness” or “holding power to account” or any of that sanctimonious bullshit. I’m talking about being a thorn in the side of our self-appointed betters.

based

[-] [email protected] 51 points 2 years ago

This is a well-known terrorist tactic, and is actually part of the definition of terrorism.

Terrorists are people who spread happiness and the impression of happiness to further their political goals.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 2 years ago

This is leftist cope pretty much.

Some people say China will collapse imminently.

USA is strong in many ways.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 2 years ago

Stop the war

[-] [email protected] 53 points 2 years ago

No because we need to bitch about things sometimes

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Vampire

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF