Is there a mag in it?
Not in this one, here's how it looks with a magazine:

it just has a big foregrip around the magwell, which can look kind of confusing when you see it without the magazine in
Is there a mag in it?
Not in this one, here's how it looks with a magazine:

it just has a big foregrip around the magwell, which can look kind of confusing when you see it without the magazine in
yep - one for semi-auto, one for full-auto
there's a handful of submachine guns which did it this way instead of just having a fire selector, the most prominent example's probably the Beretta Model 38

https://xcancel.com/bonzerbarry/status/2062129326976295067
Some documentation showing the aftermath of Iranian strikes at Kuwait international. The Kuwaiti Army says that they detected 13 ballistic missiles and 17 drones in the attack. This is a similar amount to what they would detect during a day in the war.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2062129272173613056/vid/avc1/720x1276/T6_1zCDeqHIZWdfM.mp4
https://xcancel.com/MenchOsint/status/2062157837367709825
Iranian strikes last night destroyed at least one aircraft hangar at the US Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait. Sentinel-2 Satelitte imagery from May 29 & June 3
I guess in addition to the idea of Dubai, the idea of Kuwait will have to be destroyed too
France bans Israel from major weapons show
The arms fair is a chance for the world’s largest weapons-makers to showcase their wares, including tanks, artillery systems and rocket launchers.
more
France has banned Israel from participating in Eurosatory, one of the world's largest arms shows that kicks off later this month, the Israeli government announced on Monday. "The French decision encompasses: a ban on government representatives attending the exhibition; a ban on opening an Israeli national pavilion; and a restriction limiting Israeli defense industries to displaying air defense products only, with offensive systems explicitly excluded," the Israeli defense ministry said in a statement. "As a result, the [Israeli defense ministry] will be unable to participate in the exhibition or establish a national pavilion," the statement added. An official from the French armed forces ministry confirmed the ban to POLITICO and said Israeli companies that showcase air and missile defense systems only will be allowed to attend.
Eurosatory starts on June 15 in Villepinte, in the Paris region. The arms fair is a chance for the world's largest weapons-makers, including Germany's Rheinmetall, the U.S.'s Lockheed Martin and South Korea's Hanwha Aerospace to showcase their military equipment, including tanks, artillery systems and rocket launchers. The move is likely to deepen a monthslong diplomatic rift between France and Israel, that culminated when Paris recognized Palestinian statehood in September last year. In March, Israel announced it would stop all defense procurement from France. On Monday, the French government sharply condemned Israel's assault in Lebanon and called for a U.N. Security Council emergency meeting.
It's not the first time that France, which hosts some of Europe's largest land, naval and air shows, has barred Israeli companies from attending. In 2024, the French government banned them from Eurosatory and naval arms show Euronaval over Israel's war on Gaza, and from the Paris Air Show in June last year. "This is a disgraceful decision, one that reeks of political and commercial calculation," the Israeli defense ministry said in its statement, hinting France was also banning Israeli companies because they're competing with the French industry.
US, NATO allies to launch scaled-back Baltic Sea drills
The U.S. and NATO allies will launch scaled-back drills in the Baltic Sea this week, as conflicts in other regions draw ships away, though the exercise will still send a message of unity and strength to Russia, a senior German military official said.
"message of strength" = "if we ever have to contest two straits at once, we're fucked"
more
The annual exercise, held for more than five decades since 1971, brings together some 20 vessels from 15 nations with around 6,000 personnel - roughly half the size of last year’s drills - during a period of heightened tensions in the Baltic region. Officials say the smaller footprint reflects operational realities rather than waning commitment, as Western navies remain tied up in other areas including the Middle East’s Strait of Hormuz and the Arctic. The US BALTOPS naval exercise, which takes place from June 4 to June 20, will still be the biggest maneuver in the Baltic Sea this year, with Washington providing the flagship Mount Whitney vessel, despite months of fierce criticism of NATO by U.S. President Donald Trump and plans to cut U.S. commitments to the alliance. While the U.S.-led exercise is not designed as a direct response to current events, German Rear Admiral Stephan Haisch said the timing inevitably amplifies its political relevance. “In this period, it is a sign of the alliance’s strength, that a major exercise is being conducted, under U.S. leadership, with broad NATO participation”, he said. “It is a sign of the alliance’s unity and strength, and I am speaking of all allies here.”
I wonder how it feels to be a US commander and have to go on about "NATO unity" in all public statements while your commander-in-chief is constantly whining about NATO
As Commander Task Force Baltic, Haisch is in charge of a multinational naval headquarters for the Baltic Sea, established by Germany in the coastal city of Rostock in 2024 amid a growing focus on the area as tensions with Russia grew. His headquarters is capable of leading NATO operations in the Baltic Sea during a conflict with Russia and will do so for the upcoming US BALTOPS drills which are traditionally planned by the U.S.
Securing vital sea routes
BALTOPS will begin with drills in the western Baltic before shifting eastward to rehearse resupply and protection of free sea routes around the Swedish island of Gotland - a core task for NATO as the region’s strategic importance has grown. Open sea routes are seen as critical, particularly for supplying the Baltic states - linked only by a narrow land corridor to NATO’s mainland - in a crisis. “Free sea lines of communication - that is central,” Haisch said, pointing to the need to safeguard military logistics as well as commercial shipping. Asked about past incidents in the Baltics attributed to Russia by Western officials, Haisch said he did not expect Moscow to cross a threshold that would trigger NATO’s collective defense clause, known as Article 5, even as tensions remain elevated. “I would assume Russia to stay below the Article 5 threshold if they seek to test us.”
https://xcancel.com/Alex_Oloyede2/status/2061846405308899405
The Armed Forces of Ukraine set up a drone control point in a church to avoid strikes by the Russian military. Footage explicitly shows a personnel setting up the "Baba Yaga" heavy drone. Attacks against these people in the church will not be shown out of respect.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/2061846308319805441/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/9OJtps-K4_-Q4Nsa.mp4
figures on Iran are more difficult since the US, Israel and the Gulf states did a lot of bullshitting (not that Ukraine couldn't be doing so in the above figures too, in fact they likely are with the interception rates (the blue bars), but the propaganda incentives here are different - Ukraine wants to portray Russian strikes as appropriately massive in order to beg for more equipment and munitions from the West, while the US wanted to portray its interdiction campaign against Iran as successful and thus needed to push a "daily Iranian launches are going down" narrative), but this source https://jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Operations-Epic-Fury-and-Roaring-Lion-04.08-4.10.26.pdf claims
Iran has launched roughly 5,156 drones, 2,181 ballistic missiles, and 59 cruise missiles since the war began, according to JINSA data.
that's for 40 days, so adjusting the rate to a month we get ≈3.9k
a lot of accountants are going to be stretching the definition of defence spending to include what would normally just be regular civilian infrastructure or industrial policy
In fact, this is already happening - Italy’s government met the 2 percent of GDP spent on defense target not through new spending but by reclassifying existing spending
Europe’s difficult trade-off between military and welfare spending: The Italian case
The idea of building a three-mile suspension bridge between Sicily and Italy’s mainland was notoriously a pet project of former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who was keen to leave a major landmark in Italy’s poorest and most remote regions. ... Berlusconi, who died in 2023, would have been stunned to learn that his dream might soon become reality, since Italy’s current prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, has decided to classify the proposed bridge over the Strait of Messina as an infrastructure project with military relevance. Funding might also not be a problem because—as military infrastructure—the bridge might be directly or indirectly financed by the European Union.
...
And so, the tariffs risk becoming a further incentive for those European countries with weaker finances to empty the substance of their commitments made to NATO, by camouflaging other already planned expenditures, such as the Messina bridge, as military spending.
...
For spending on “core defense requirements”—the 3.5% in NATO’s formula—that will be difficult. But defense experts have already suggested some shifts in the budget. For instance, coastguard activities currently serving mostly as anti-migration patrols, are likely to be relabeled as military operations. Others have proposed incorporating the Guardia di Finanza, Italy’s tax police, as a military unit, which would be exceptional but legal in times of war. However, NATO will have the final word on such accounting acrobatics.
...
The government is considering including several ports in the list of infrastructural investments that will contribute to the achievement of the NATO goal on defense spending. The idea is to allocate resources for the renovation and expansion of the areas dedicated to ship construction and maintenance. A new breakwater already planned in Genoa might be used to dock military vessels. Moreover, as Deputy Minister of Infrastructure Edoardo Rixi has said, “the investments could also include access routes to ports, such as exceptional transport corridors, also for Italian metalworking.” So, roads and railways are being built with the excuse that some of Italy’s infrastructure was not designed to accommodate big and heavy military tanks.
rare galaxy-brain NATO move - make your tanks ridiculously heavy and practically unusable in most of the world, and then use that to justify a whole bunch of infrastructure construction that can handle those tanks
https://xcancel.com/SU_57R/status/2061901262472519947
Ukraine reports that May 2026 saw the largest Russian launch of Geran drones into Ukraine. They reports 8,150 drones were launched. The most ever in a single month.

now imagine what would happen in a US war against China
U.S. Army Requests 857 THAAD Air Defense Interceptors in Major Indo-Pacific Missile Defense Expansion.
The U.S. Army is preparing a major expansion of its THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) missile air defense arsenal, requesting 857 interceptors in its Fiscal Year 2027 budget proposal, according to recently released budget documents. The unprecedented procurement highlights a growing effort to strengthen protection against long-range ballistic missile threats and reinforce deterrence across the Indo-Pacific as regional missile capabilities continue to advance.
this is, btw, more than all THAAD interceptors procured until this point (by the US, there's also some foreign clients), which is a little under 700 (FY26 budget estimates, pg. 88)
more
With 830 interceptors funded through mandatory appropriations, the plan would significantly increase the Army’s ability to sustain missile defense operations during a prolonged conflict. The expansion strengthens the resilience of the U.S. layered air and missile defense architecture and reflects the increasing importance of countering large-scale missile attacks in future high-intensity warfare. According to FY2027 U.S. Army acquisition documents, the request is among the largest THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) interceptor procurements ever proposed by the service. The investment underscores the increasing importance of strategic missile defense as the Pentagon prepares for potential high-intensity operations against near-peer adversaries, particularly China.
THAAD, short for Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, is the U.S. military's premier ground-based ballistic missile defense system designed to engage incoming missiles both inside and outside the Earth's atmosphere during the final stage of flight. Each THAAD battery combines AN/TPY-2 radar, fire control systems, launchers, and hit-to-kill interceptors capable of destroying ballistic missile threats through direct collision. The system provides a critical upper-tier defensive layer, complementing Patriot air and missile defense systems by engaging threats at greater altitudes and longer ranges. THAAD remains one of the most advanced ballistic missile defense systems operated by the United States. Developed by Lockheed Martin, the system is designed to intercept short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles during the terminal phase of flight using hit-to-kill technology. Unlike conventional air defense missiles equipped with explosive warheads, THAAD interceptors destroy incoming threats through direct kinetic impact, providing a highly effective capability against ballistic missile attacks.
The scale of the FY2027 request signals a significant shift in U.S. Army missile defense planning. Historically, THAAD interceptor procurement has been relatively limited due to the system's specialized mission and high acquisition cost. The proposed purchase of 857 interceptors, therefore, represents not only replenishment of existing stocks but also a substantial increase in the Army's capacity to sustain missile defense operations during prolonged crises or major conflicts. The request comes as U.S. military planners place growing emphasis on the Indo-Pacific theater, where China's People's Liberation Army Rocket Force has developed one of the world's largest inventories of conventional ballistic missiles. Over the past two decades, Beijing has fielded increasingly capable missile systems designed to threaten U.S. forces, allied military installations, logistics hubs, and critical infrastructure throughout the Western Pacific. Among the most significant challenges are China's DF-21 and DF-26 ballistic missiles, which enable the People's Liberation Army to conduct long-range, precision strikes against regional targets. These systems are intended to complicate U.S. force deployment and sustainment during a conflict by targeting air bases, ports, command centers, and other key military facilities. Expanding THAAD interceptor inventories directly strengthens U.S. forces' ability to defend these assets and maintain operational effectiveness under missile attack.
The procurement also reflects broader lessons learned from recent conflicts and war-gaming assessments conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense. Military planners increasingly recognize that future high-intensity warfare could involve sustained missile campaigns that require significantly larger interceptor inventories than those maintained in previous decades. The ability to absorb repeated attacks while continuing defensive operations has become a central requirement for modern missile defense forces. Beyond protecting U.S. military installations, additional THAAD interceptors would enhance the credibility of America's regional security commitments. THAAD batteries already contribute to missile defense missions in key locations such as Guam and South Korea, while supporting the broader integrated air and missile defense architecture that protects U.S. forces and allies. Larger interceptor stockpiles would improve readiness and reduce the risk of inventory shortfalls during extended operations. The proposed acquisition aligns with ongoing Pentagon efforts to build a layered missile defense network integrating THAAD with Patriot air and missile defense systems, Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense capabilities, the Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS), and future regional defense initiatives. This architecture is intended to provide multiple opportunities to defeat incoming threats while increasing the survivability of forward-deployed forces.
The industrial implications of the procurement are equally significant. A production order of this magnitude would support sustained manufacturing activity across the U.S. missile defense industrial base and could drive further investments in production capacity. As global demand for advanced missile defense systems continues to grow, maintaining robust interceptor manufacturing capabilities has become a strategic priority for both the Pentagon and Congress. The FY2027 THAAD request ultimately highlights how missile defense is becoming a central component of U.S. deterrence strategy in the Indo-Pacific. By dramatically increasing interceptor inventories, the U.S. Army is preparing for an operational environment in which ballistic missile attacks may be a defining feature of future conflicts. The planned acquisition of 857 THAAD interceptors demonstrates Washington's determination to ensure that U.S. forces and allies can withstand sustained missile campaigns while preserving freedom of action across one of the world's most strategically important regions.
(not sure if this is exactly news, but it's a "holy shit what the fuck are economists even doing" anecdote brought about by the current situation, at least) https://xcancel.com/surplustakes/status/2061422676002918836

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK AN ECONOMY EVEN IS, PAUL?
genuinely, if you've played 1 (one) match of a real-time strategy video game, you apparently have a better understanding of economics, because you at least can grasp that there's resources in specific locations of the map that you have to gather before you can build units
I appreciate you linking this for that reason, I had followed that thread but missed that specific sub-discussion within it (folks, we gotta stop having
that go on for like a day! honestly, this is kind of one thing I don't like about the megathread format, long discussions like this can get lost way down in the list, I guess it depends on how you're sorting the thread but I'm a
?sort=Newkinda guy)I find it really baffling for a person to go on about materialism this materialism that while ignoring literally one of the most rudimentary and fundamental material things, geography, like, the fucking ground we stand on? Distance is, in fact, real, and one's distance from the empire has obvious impacts on how a war would turn out. "just build drones lmao" being presented as a materialist analysis with complete ignorance of what those drones would actually be hitting is just... let's do some actual analysis and look at a fucking map for once: