Strangle

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think I would ever mistake you for a capitalist

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This didn’t look like unsafe driving to me

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why isn’t the bike the one who caused the accident? He was in the roadway, wasn’t to the side at all. They weren’t riding in single file, they were riding across each other.

Take some responsibility for your own safety too. You know there are cars using the road, you shouldn’t assume that they will see you. Stay safe

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It all depends on the circumstances. Driving down the road, and glancing away for a minute and not seeing a bicycle driving on the road until a second before you hit them isn’t really negligent.

That’s why it’s an accident. The driver was within the lines of the roadway, the bicycle wasn’t on the shoulder, and it looks like the driver did not see the bicycle.

That’s called an accident. If you’re negligent for any reason, sure punish the driver. But this doesn’t look at all like that kind of situation here.

I know this crowd is very pro bikes and doesn’t think cars should exist, but you guys are the extreme

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Of course it matters. Driving drunk is not the same as driving stone cold sober.

How could you think they are at all comparable?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s okay that you’ll lose your house, because there are people without houses.

Perfect retarded communist point of view. Let’s just make everyone poor, then we can just change the definition of what poor is

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s great, have a look at what those things should cost and then look at how the government is mismanaging their funding that we give them

Why even bother with wages, just have the corporations pay the government directly for our work. The government can figure out how to distribute everything and fuck us all

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what I hear you saying is that families with homes should just lose their homes because funding the government is more important? And they should have thought of that before buying a home?

Are you a fucking idiot?

Let’s just make MORE poverty stricken people, the government comes before all! It sounds like you just want everyone to hand over their pay cheques to the government so they can decide who gets what and when they get it, so we can all be totally fucked.

This Lemmy crowd is filled with morons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Children don’t know anything yet. They haven’t lived enough to know anything yet. Because they’re children.

Wait until you’re grown up, you’ll understand that we shouldn’t listen to teenagers about how the world should work.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You have to understand how expensive it is supporting a family right now. People are spending an insane amount of money on groceries alone. $1,000 - $1,800 a month

The gas to get to work for a two income household could be upwards of $1,000 a month.

Mortgage renewal? Hope you have an extra $700 a month laying around.

Cad payments? Ya that’s going to add another $200-$300 a month in interest payments alone now.

And forget it if you have kids. Daycare, physical activities, summer camp? Maybe another $12k per year depending on how many kids you have!

The issue here is that the middle class are also being destroyed and without them there’s no money to even give to the government to help lower income people.

In Canada, $150k a year for a family of 5 is low income now.

At least lower income people get subsidized food and housing. Middle class? They get 20% interest on credit cards to keep afloat.

This isn’t about wages, it’s about costs. All of them of which taxes are just one. A big one, but just one.

You can attack the corpo’s later, right now the fight is with the government to get the money going out under control.

You can get a 50% raise, but if you’re still spending 70% more to eat and have a roof over your head, it doesn’t really matter does it?

If shit was more affordable, maybe $40k a year could be a livable wage again. Cause right now it’s not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I pay 30% of every dollar I make and I also pay another 18% or so every time I spend a dollar directly to the government.

And the prices of EVERYTHING has Skyrocketed!

When prices go up, the goods and services taxes you pay also go up. When prices go down, they go down too.

Interest rates are killing people, prices are killing people, taxes on top of taxes are killing people

 

I have been thinking about this quite a bit today.

Why do people put up with and actively seek out world boss timers? It seems to me like a mechanic that I would only engage with (world bosses) if I happen to be online and notice one while I have my map open.

I have read a thread over on reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/Diablo/comments/1595555/i_have_played_25_hours_of_season_1_and_have_yet/

And a lot of posters seem to be tracking and scheduling their real life around these timers and spawns.

Do people like this kind of thing in their games? If not, why do they do it?

I can’t imagine anyone enjoying having to do this, and I would think the only reason it’s in the game is because people begrudgingly do it, and fall into this behavioral domination where they plan real life around a video game timer.

This is extremely intrusive to me, and I wholly reject it and refuse to participate in tracking spawn times. Wouldn’t the devs change this if no one interacted with it?

Why do you (or don’t you) track world boss spawn times?

view more: next ›