Spuddaccino

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (10 children)

This guy is an idiot. I don't have anything against LGBTQ people, but when it comes to medical stuff, you're biologically male or female, because it matters for the sorts of health risks you might be susceptible to.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (16 children)

The problem with this line of thinking, as well as the point the OP's meme makes, is that it's drawing a line between the two in the first place, when in fact there can be significant overlap.

A quick dictionary lookup yields this for terrorism: "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." Note that "especially against civilians" doesn't mean it has to be, just that civilians being involved makes it a stronger case.

Now, you may have already spotted the issue, but here it is anyway: this is an incredibly broad definition. Laws don't bind those in other states, so ANY act of violence or intimidation is unlawful.

So...freedom fighters fight using violence, against the laws of the country that claims sovereignty over them... so they're terrorists. Full stop. This doesn't mean that we should or shouldn't support them, it just means that the definition of terrorism is pretty useless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I'm sure there's an obvious way to make a hybrid boat work like a hybrid car, but it's not jumping out at me. Cars can capture energy from braking, but boats have to accelerate in the other direction to stop, and generally aren't in stop-and-go traffic all that much.

Maybe we put sails on the boats and only run the engines when the wind isn't going the right way?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

The rising tide lifts all ships.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

If anything this should be the other way around. Bitcoin has traditionally been wildly unstable, pegging it to the dollar in some way would do a lot to legitimize it as a currency. Pegging the dollar to bitcoin is just asking for the dollar's value to go out of control.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

My first thought was "trumpet", so I'm on board with toot.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Graphics, as in graphical fidelity, polygon count, etc. are valueless to me.

Art style is everything. I don't care if I can see the pixels in the game, I still play the same SNES my family had 25 years ago. The game has to look good, and graphical fidelity is a tool to help achieve that, but it's only a tool, and useless without the appropriate art direction.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but only around the time of sports matches. That makes it predictable, and the anti-hooligan magic can be more effeciently focused. It's actually a little-known fact that Quidditch matches are timed with the solstice so that the anti-hooligan wards are at their strongest.

The Irish are much more unpredictable with their drunken hooliganism, so in the early days they used to break through the wards by accident and go on drunken rampages across Wales before eventually being segregated to their own, smaller island.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's very clear why people use Spotify. They use Spotify because they've heard of it and it's pre-loaded on their phones. Most people dont think at all about what the company behind the app does behind the scenes.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's not.

"Hey, look at that girl/car/tree/Chihuahua" isn't a left nod. It's eye contact, then you look at the thing.

"Come here/go there, let's talk" isn't a right nod. It's a weird neck movement where your head is kind of sideways and you're nodding in the direction of the place you want them to go. You usually use "Hey, look at that tree" first before you try to get them to go to the tree to talk.

Can confirm up and down are correct enough, though. Up is for people you know, down is for people you don't.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

This is exactly why I usually say it means "Something's wrong" instead of "I want something" because the cat is perfectly capable of occupying un-pillowed laps, it just chooses not to.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I suppose in that respect, it does mean "I yearn!" but I've taken it to mean "Something's wrong!", with the nuance being that he'll want his food bowl filled even if he's not hungry or me on the couch even if he doesn't immediately want a lap.

view more: ‹ prev next ›