SparroHawc

joined 4 days ago
[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yup! Totally plausible - just more expensive and less repeatable. And harder to use against moving targets.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Although you are correct, this destroys the engine.

A good, efficient fusion engine just needs to point the exhaust end towards the enemy and the hyper-accelerated particles will punch a hole through the target for you. And then you point at the next target, etc. etc.

Also, it's a butchered quote from Larry Niven's Known Space books, referred to as the "Kzinti Lesson" - because the Kzinti thought humanity was unarmed and helpless until they discovered that humans are really good at improvising weapons.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 4 points 14 hours ago

Even if they do know, they almost certainly are buying into the 'he's a criminal and deserves to be deported' bit.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Sigh. Yet another article assuming Mangione's guilt. Ben Burgis didn't even bother to say 'allegedly' anywhere.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Technically yes, I could, but I originally wanted to slap together a dumb meme about newbies to 196 getting trapped by The Rule. When I couldn't upload the image I gave up and made this post.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

......thanks, I think....

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The usefulness of a fusion engine as a weapon is directly correlated to its efficiency.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Even consoles these days require you to install files onto the machine before it'll play...

 

but I gotta follow the rule anyways, so here's a pointless text post.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

They're called Subaru Outbacks now.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Agreed. I'm not likely to say it to their face... but here, I'm preaching to the choir and I can be a bit salty about it.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Part of this is likely to be because with how stupidly car-focused the infrastructure is, revoking someone's license to drive is essentially revoking someone's right to autonomy.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Cars shouldn’t jump up and down due to road quality.

I live in a hilly area. Any time someone with projector headlights is on even a slight downward curve that I'm facing, it's the equivalent of brights in my eyes. Even with adaptive headlights, cresting a ridge would still blast anyone on the other side for the short amount of time it takes for your car to realize there's someone there.

For point 3... You're right, and you're wrong. Light from point sources instead of diffuse sources is worse for your retina. The light gets focused by your eye's lenses onto a much smaller area, which can potentially damage the sensitive photoreceptor cells. Ideally, there would be regulations that limit a headlight's candles per mm^2 rather than just overall candles. Astigmatism makes it so the light glares across half your vision, which makes it worse for seeing other things on the road besides the headlight glare, but conversely makes it better for not murdering your retina because the light is spread across a wider area.

view more: next ›