It's a class-based metaphor that judges how successful you are when compared to an idealistic version of someone who is successful by class. The Jones's are portrayed metaphorically as this rich, up-to-date, always on top of things, always getting things first and other things. If you don't meet those kind of qualifications, then you're not keeping up with the Jones's.

I'll give you a better Gary Stu example - Superman. The guy was originally designed to be all-perfect, all-knowing, all-seeing and incredibly strong with a reinforced moral system for good. He has to always be the one saving the day, he's got the looks and that ran for a very long time. Up until the 90s did we get ballsy writers to actually kill him off temporarily, but even then he came back shortly after renewed.

Quite frankly, I don't like Superman that much for that reason. Sure he's been going through different arcs in the past 30 - 40 years that challenges his mystique but I can't care enough for him to even feel slightly in favor of him.

Batman is more of my level. Sure, he has his fair deal of plot armor, but his origin has always been that he was just a guy who has a lot of wealth and wears a bat suit while wielding lots of technology at his disposal. He can still get his ass kicked, he can still be succumbed to everything a normal human would suffer with and isn't too afraid to admit that he's human who would need help from more capably powerful heroes.

If it already is, because it had already been decided. People once again misunderstand what exactly the 1st Amendment even covers. It protects you from the government silencing your voice and expression, which is what someone like Trump has been working hard to do.

It does not and should not protect you outside from that. You do not have a case on your hands when you're banned from an online forum for using hate speech. Because that forum, is not the government. Facebook, is not the government. Reddit, is not the government. So on and so forth.

These lowlifes will turn anything into content, including everything from relationships to childbirth. That's how pathetic it'd be.

I think what always has plagued software engineering jobs is the office politics. The constant meetings. The ridiculous standards. The monotonous routines. The zig-zagging logistics of upper management. The dead-end dread feeling.

I don't even work software engineering, but it's just something I always heard about and kinda seen a bit of.

I'm revisiting a project where, I'm trying to subtract vocals off of an old radio talk show I still listen to religiously. They use techno music from DI.FM in the 2000s and the reason I still listen to the episodes at all is because of what music is used. It's a hard project to do because, first off, I have to find something to remove 'vocals' (in other words, the hosts talking in the show) and not only that, it is mostly mono. That's why it's difficult to do.

And someone before, when I was last on the Lemmy platform, was kind enough to DM me and ask if I sent audio snippets of the show so he can identify what tracks that was played. Since he claimed he had some archive of many tracks from that period. Problem is, I didn't go through with it because this show would be considered incredibly politically incorrect, moreso by today's standards and I don't want to go through the trouble of being asked about 'what the fuck is wrong with you' in regards to the content.

Like, I'd like to stop listening to it too, least at the rate I'm listening it. But until I have those episodes where the talking is removed, only then will I begin trying to splice and upload pieces to see what people can identify for me.

Do you ever stop to think that maybe you're being lied to? Where was that part of the process?

I think the word 'slop' has really been overused at this point. It's dead to me.

IMDB has existed for a long, long time. It's honestly a shame as to what they turned into. They used to have been like the pinnacle of online movie reviewing and showcasing. Then they decided to axe the forums. Then they decided to blanket their splash page with what big movie is happening.

It just declined from there.

At this rate, yeah.

I mean, that's how America was originally founded. We got sick of Imperial Britain's shit, fought them to get the fuck away from us. Then, when critical ideals came ahead about slavery, we had our civil war. We definitely need another, but the problem is, with how the world has changed.

Because, it'll be very bloody simply because one side will have all of the guns and ammunition (Government, police, military .etc) and the opposing side would only have numbers. In either case, it would send a very impactful and long-standing message about what happens when things are left unchecked for too long.

I don't think Democrats are that interested in fixing or helping things anymore, they have their own agendas, disguised in the form of progressive measures. They helped fund ICE earlier this year. They didn't fight hard enough to prevent any measures Trump and Republicans have taken that has undone what progress we have done.

So, if shedding blood has to be the answer to make anyone see or realize what really needs to be done, then that's what it is going to take.

Mine is, just buy cheap food with what you can and moderate it.

I know a lot of people will recommend cooking and baking. But, what people aren't talking enough of, is that it could take a lot of materials to get recipes done right. And those materials required could be expensive to gather. And once you're done cooking said meal, you only have the materials to usually make that meal and you've got nothing else to lean on that you want to eat readily without cooking.

So what you ideally would want to do is set a budget and try to think to yourself as to what you're comfortable with compromising, then just work up to that budget between what you want to cook and what you want readily there to eat.

I hate it.

I think gambling has tainted sports and is the epitome of corruption to the core. It's very ironic that a baseball player by the name of Pete Rose, got a lifetime MLB ban for gambling, yet give it 20 some odd years later and Draft Kings is promoted which is gambling.

It fuels addiction, it makes people throw away anything they could that they could bet with, on the off chance, which is narrow, of winning it big.

It's why I hate Las Vegas entirely, I hated it when poker games were nationally broadcast for a while at one point and so on.