Slav3k1

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
AMD Batch 9 just charged in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Can I ask you are you DIY? Are you getting RAM and SSD from framework or you will bring your own? Thanks!

WD - BLACK SN770M 2TB for $169.99 in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Amazon? In which country?

RAM kits 64 (2x32) DDR5 5600MHz Kingston vs Crucial vs ? any other recommendations? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ppl say tady the lower latency can show some benefits from gaming, when sobre lost of the ram is serving the igpu. Feel free to do more research on specifics. If you were not a casual gamer at least, you don't need to worry about cas latency i think.

Amd batch 7 payment in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What would be your best estimate on batch 9 shipping date?

Btw is there some date until which i am allowed to immediately return the product if i am not satisfied?

0
RAM kits 64 (2x32) DDR5 5600MHz Kingston vs Crucial vs ? any other recommendations? (alien.top)
 

Hello,

I am checking ram kits for my batch 9 FW13 AMD. So far I was comparing these two:

Kingston KF556S40IBK2-64 I can get for 210,06 €

64GB (2x32GB) DDR5 5600MT/s CL40 FURY Impact Black PnPNumero di parte: KF556S40IBK2-64📷

Non-ECC Unbuffered SODIMM (Kit of 2) 2RX8 40-40-40 1.1V 262-pin 16Gbit

​

Crucial CT2K32G56C46S5 I can get for 293,55€

DIMM type Unbuffered TechnologyDDR5 Density 64GB Kit (2x32GB) Module quantity 2 Voltage 1.1V/(5V ext) Module type SODIMM Default and performance recovery profiles Default (JEDEC)46-45-45

Do you guys have any other candidates that I should consider over the two mentioned above?

I guess that the Kingston should be better since it has the smaller CL and it is also significantly cheaper so I gues that is the clear winner?

Thanks a lot for your advice