ShareMySims

ID: a black flag with white text "fight war not wars, destroy power not people"

ID: All I Want to Do is SCREAM:

Seize the means of production

Create a classless society

Realize our potential as a species

Establish Fully Automated Luxury Queer Earth Anarchism

Actualize our utopian dreams

Make cool shit because we're not trapped in this dystopian hellscape

ID: line drawing of an upright bunny with a black bandana tied around their neck, holding a lit match in their mouth like you might a toothpick. The text says "we can't just vote fascism away, the time has come to disobey. (be brave!)"

ID: Text in the style of the "the more you know" slogan which says "remember your roots". Under the text instead of a shooting star with a rainbow trail is a red brick with a sparkly progress flag as its trail

ID: a drawing of a bunny with a person's hand covering their face, at the top it says "don't look mr. fluffers, that bad man trump is on the telly again"

ID: drawing of a friendly little frog holding a lit Molotov cocktail, around them it says "be the light you want to see in the world"

ID: 3 stills from A Bullet for Baldwin (1956)

1. Alfred Hitchcock says "I've just come into possession of a cure for fascism"

2. He sets some bullets on his desk and says "they come in capsule form. For best results, they must be taken internally."

3. He holds up a revolver and says "here is the handy applicator."

The DWP confirms that draconian ‘savings’ are coming down the track. Are we a nation that will repair hospitals, but not help a nurse with long Covid?

In the days after the budget, the headlines were dominated by talk of Rachel Reeves’s “tax and spend” bonanza. The message was clear: austerity is officially over. When there was concern about squeezed incomes, it was solely for workers. As the Mail front page put it: “Reeves’ £40bn tax bombshell for Britain’s strivers”. Almost a week later, there has still barely been a word about the policy set to hit the group long scapegoated as Britain’s skivers: the billions of pounds’ worth of benefit cuts for disabled people.

Making up just a couple of lines in a 77-minute speech, you’d have been forgiven for dozing past Reeves’ blink-and-you’d-miss-it bombshell. With a record number of Britons off work with long-term illness, the government will need to “reduce the benefits bill”, she said, before noting ministers had “inherited” the Conservatives’ plans to reform the work capability assessment (WCA). That plan, let’s not forget, was to take up to £4,900 a year each from 450,000 people who are too sick or disabled to work – a move that the Resolution Foundation says would “degrade living standards” for families already on some of the lowest incomes in the country.

That’s on top of Tory proposals to tighten eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip) – which Labour has been consulting on since the election – that would push the cuts to a steep £3bn.

“We will deliver those savings as part of our fundamental reforms to the health and disability benefits system that the work and pensions secretary [Liz Kendall] will bring forward,” Reeves went on. It turns out austerity isn’t over for everyone.

It’s no wonder that many disabled people – and charities and journalists for that matter – thought this meant Labour would implement the outgoing Tory policies. In fact, the government has no such plan. When I spoke to the Department for Work and Pensions, it confirmed it will make the same “savings” the last government committed to – but it cannot as yet say how those savings will be made.

A spokesperson confirmed to me that the WCA needs to be “reformed or replaced as part of a proper plan to genuinely support disabled people into work – bringing down the benefits bill and ensuring we continue to deliver the savings set out by the previous government. But these sorts of changes shouldn’t be made in haste. That’s why we’re taking the time to review this in the round before setting out next steps on our approach.” When I pressed, they added that changes to the WCA – whatever they may be – will come into effect in early 2025.

There is something faintly ludicrous about the government announcing billions of pounds of cuts to disability benefits before working out how it is going to do it, akin to the Child Catcher wielding a big net and not caring who it is he traps. It is right that the WCA – long known to be a dangerously faulty assessment – is consigned to the scrapheap. But “reform” should not mean less funding, and reducing funding should not be the purpose of reform.

Much like when George Osborne aimed to cut the disability benefits bill by a fifth, “welfare reform” based on arbitrary cost-cutting says the quiet part out loud: benefits won’t be awarded based on who needs them – just on what they cost. It is social security by spreadsheet, severing the social contract that promises the state will be there in times of sickness and disability, and adding a footnote that says, “but only if we can afford it”. That last week’s budget revealed huge investment for infrastructure at the same time as disability benefit cuts exposes how even the affordability argument is largely fabricated. There is money to fix hospital buildings but not to feed a nurse bedbound with long Covid.

The financial impact of such “reform” on those relying on benefits is well established but the psychological toll should not be underestimated. Since gaining power, Labour has drip-fed the rightwing press sound bites and op-eds on potential benefit cuts, leaving news outlets to speculate wildly for clicks. The budget’s half-announcement has only added to the confusion and fear, issuing vague dog whistles of “fraud” and high “benefit bills” while forcing millions of people to wait months to find out if they will lose the money they need to live.

It is not simply that such delays create uncertainty for those affected, they also create space and legitimacy for a politics of resentment and prejudice. In the days after the budget, Reform MP Rupert Lowe took to X to list some of the health conditions people receive Pip for and pronounce to his followers which ones were least-deserving. Hours later, former Sunday Times political editor Isabel Oakeshott went on TalkTV to call disability benefit recipients “parasites”.

It would be easy to say this stuff is repulsive – it is – but it is also a very real symptom of years of stagnating wages, high bills, pressured public services and a media ecosystem that too often distorts and divides. Crudely, these conditions do two things to a population that we are already seeing fester in Britain: they make some people sick and reliant on the safety net – and they turn other people against them.

By the end of this parliament, the Office for Budget Responsibility says, half of all claims for the main benefit will be on health grounds, as the impact of NHS delays, a pandemic and increasing poverty continues to bite. As Labour mulls over what it will cost our society to provide this support, it might be worth considering what it would cost us not to. That particular price cannot be measured in bills and debt but is altogether more ruinous: a nation doomed to repeat the same mistakes, growing ever meaner and colder towards those who have less.

That Kemi Badenoch – a small-state zealot whose culture war targets include autistic children – is now leader of the opposition only reinforces the urgency of a Labour government that stokes the best, not worst, of our instincts. By its own timeline, the party now has a few months to hunt for its conscience. Disabled people can only hope it finds it.

ID: V from V for Vendetta saying "people should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people"

ID: the text "body hair is gender neutral" over a super close up drawing of a person, we see their flowing red hair and dark pink lipstick, there are small hairs on their upper lip and chin. The top couple of buttons of their shirt are undone, and they are holding it open to reveal hair on their chest. Their nails match their lipstick, and they have 3 badges on their shirt - a progress pride flag, a trans flag, and one saying "she they".

King Charles and Prince William are secretly raking in millions of pounds from cash-strapped government departments, schools, the armed forces and even the NHS, a new investigation claims.

The latest Channel 4 Dispatches inquiry asserts that while the monarch and heir to the throne’s respective private estates – the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, which generate £50 million a year – are not funded by the taxpayer, each receives ‘extensive’ amounts of money from public services.

Documents made public for the first time allegedly show how the Duchy of Lancaster is banking £11.4 million as part of a deal with Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust to house its new fleet of electric ambulances.

It also claims the Duchy of Cornwall has signed a £37 million deal to lease the currently inactive Dartmoor Prison to the Ministry of Justice, charged the navy more than £1 million to build and use jetties and moor warships, and stands to earn nearly £600,000 from rental agreements with state schools over the lifetime of six different leases.

The Duchy of Lancaster is a portfolio of land, property and assets across England and Wales held in trust for the Sovereign, including key urban developments, historic buildings, high-quality farm land and areas of great natural beauty, dating back to the 14th century.

The Duchy of Cornwall is a similar portfolio valued at more than £1 billion which provides an income for the heir to the throne.

Both estates are exempt from paying Corporation Tax or Capital Gains Tax.

Author and royal land expert Guy Shrubsole tells the documentary: ‘[It] strikes me as very odd, that ultimately, we, the taxpayer, are paying for the NHS to have a lease or a warehouse or whatever from the Duchy of Lancaster.

‘I think this asks quite searching questions about quite how they are making their profits. Why are there not peppercorn rents or social rents being charged for the NHS, for example?’

The King, The Prince & Their Secret Millions: Dispatches airs tonight at 8.10pm on Channel 4.

King and Prince of Wales ‘take money from charities they champion’

The investigation accuses the King and his heir of making money from the good causes they promote.

It alleges the Duchy of Cornwall has pocketed at least £22 million since 2005 from a share of the rents paid on Camelford House, which sits on the banks of the Thames.

The building is nicknamed ‘charity towers’ due to the number it houses.

But two cancer charities boasting the King as a long-term patron – Marie Curie and Macmillan – have both recently downsized, with the latter saying it wanted to free up funds.

Charles became patron of St John’s Ambulance last year, which the doc claims previously paid the Duchy of Cornwall almost £60,000 for use of its land.

The King is also patron of the RNLI and William and Kate are supporters – but the Duchy of Cornwall still charges it small amounts to use slipways in various corners of the South West.

Baroness Margaret Hodge, a former Labour MP and chair of the public accounts committee, told the programme: ‘In the court of public opinion, you always have to be cleaner than clean.

‘And if there is a question mark over a charity that has a royal patronage and therefore gains extra income, then that income is then used pay rent back to the royals, it just doesn’t feel quite right.’

Royal environment ‘hypocrites’

Both the King and Prince William have warned about our responsibility to protect the environment.

Charles has said: ‘Unless we rapidly repair and restore nature’s unique economy based on harmony and balance, which is our ultimate sustainer, our own economy and survivability will be imperilled.’

And William has added: ‘The shared goals for our generation are clear, together we must protect and restore nature, clean our air, revive our oceans, build a waste free world and fix our climate.’

But Dispatches says it has unearthed investments by their estates which threaten the same natural world they insist we desperately need to protect.

Collectively, the Duchies own thousands of mineral rights – and have cashed in by striking deals with controversial mining companies for sites across the country.

In Hingston Down, an area of outstanding natural beauty, the Duchy of Cornwall leases land to one of the biggest polluters in Europe.

Royals’ tenants ‘left shivering in cold and mouldy homes’

Working with the Mirror newspaper, the programme found that scores of properties being rented out by both Duchies failed to comply with minimum energy efficient requirements for landlords – leaving some tenants shivering in homes blighted by black mould and struggling with fuel poverty.

It found 14% of homes leased by the Duchy of Cornwall and 13% by the Duchy of Lancaster have an energy performance rating of F or G.

Since 2020, it has been against the law for landlords to rent out properties that are rated below an E under the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards regulations.

Many failing properties emit huge amounts of carbon, which again impacts the environment.

One tenant said: ‘It gets miserably cold in winter. I can only heat two rooms in my home. The Duchy does not understand.’

A second added: ‘The house is cold, and it is a struggle but there is nowhere else to live here. They are not good landlords. When the wind blows the curtains start swinging. There’s no heating upstairs at all.’

‘Time for change’

Mr Shrubsole said: ‘I think the light you’re shedding on the goings on within the Duchies of Cornwall or Lancaster is crucial to generating more public debate.

‘I think it’s past time for the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster to ultimately be dissolved and folded into the Crown Estate. They have to give their profits to the Exchequer. And then some of that comes back to us, the taxpayer.

‘This isn’t about whether you think there should be a monarch or not. It’s simply about good management.’

Baroness Hodge said: ‘This would be a brilliant time for the monarch to say, I’m going to be open, and I want to be treated as fairly as anybody.

‘It’s public money, it’s taxpayer’s money – your money, it’s my money, it’s the viewers’ money.’

Charles’s annual income from the Duchy of Lancaster rose by 5% to £27.4 million in 2023/24, according to accounts published by the estate in July.

William received an annual private income of more than £23.6 million from the Duchy of Cornwall last year, accounts showed.

The income from both the duchies is separate from the taxpayer-funded Sovereign Grant which pays for the monarch’s official duties.

Neither the King nor the Prince of Wales are legally obliged to pay income tax but both have offered to do so.

A spokesperson for the Duchy of Lancaster said: ‘The Duchy of Lancaster operates as a commercial company, managing a broad range of land and property assets across England and Wales.

‘It complies with all relevant UK legislation and regulatory standards applicable to its range of business activities.

‘The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster is responsible to the Sovereign for the administration of the Duchy. However, he/she delegates certain functions, particularly those regarding asset management, to the Duchy Council.

‘While His Majesty The King takes a close interest in the work of the Duchy, the day-to-day management of the portfolio is the responsibility of the Council and executive team.

‘The Duchy has made a number of key environmental improvements in recent years, delivering a significant increase in the number of A+, A and B EPC ratings awarded to our properties as a result of refurbishment or restoration works.

‘Currently, over 87% of all Duchy let properties are rated E or above. The remainder are either awaiting scheduled improvement works or are exempted under UK legislation.

‘The financial and environmental performance of the Duchy is disclosed each year in our published Report and Accounts which are independently audited and freely available on the Duchy of Lancaster website.

‘His Majesty The King voluntarily pays tax on all income received from the Duchy, as did the late Queen Elizabeth II.’

A Duchy of Cornwall spokesperson said: ‘The Duchy of Cornwall is a private estate with a commercial imperative which we achieve alongside our commitment to restoring the natural environment and generating positive social impact for our communities.

‘Prince William became Duke of Cornwall in September 2022 and since then has committed to an expansive transformation of the Duchy.

‘This includes a significant investment to make the estate net zero by the end of 2032, as well as establishing targeted mental health support for our tenants and working with local partners to help tackle homelessness in Cornwall.’

The spokesperson added: ‘The Duchy is engaging with the critical minerals industry in Cornwall to respond to the UK Government’s Industrial Strategy.

‘We have granted a number of three-year exploration licences, and all licensees must ensure that their activities are in strict accordance with statutory requirements and meet high environmental standards.’

Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

If you didn't watch it just now, do.

If you're outside the UK, either use a VPN or wait a few days, I'm sure it'll get uploaded to dailymotion or even youtube.

Or at least give this a read:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/11/02/king-williams-estates-raking-millions-public-services-21916391/

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/nov/02/king-and-prince-william-estates-millions-charities-public-services-nhs-leasing-land