Scipitie

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Wow thanks a lot for that!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

At least in Germany it's the same. It gets ignored in the discussions concerning nuclear exit but it's actually the main reason why I'm not aggressively against it: we have save areas for nuclear storage but those fight bitterly to not have it. The areas which are currently used are... Not good. Paying someone else (such as Finland) is out of budget for both state and energy companies. The latter anyway want to do the running but not the maintenance and the building, state should pay for that.

It's really white sad for me. The (true) statement that the dangerous waste needs to be stored carefully got corrupted to "it can't be stored".

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago (3 children)

On the one hand ... “Never make fun of someone if they mispronounce a word. It means they learned it by reading.”

On the other hand.. what else are friends there for?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Are you my mommy?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Because a Ponzi scheme revolves around paying past people with fresh money without using it as promised at all.

Insurances (when fraudulent) collect money but don't pay out anyone unless forced by lawsuits. Ponzi schemes are s vers specific financial tactic.

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

The account isn't the issue in itself it's the data transfer that comes with accepting the agreement that comes with that account.

"Free" is straight wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nah, if you decode the lawful scale and the good scale to a number and go with 1 0 -1 for each then you reversed a -1/0 and that's obviously a 1/0. So you're lawful neutral!

I think?

Edit: tried to fix the scale names.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Haha brainfart. Thought about lan domains...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Who should do this vetting though? The internet was built up with the idea of technical neutrality - everything else came on top. TLDs came later and were used to either describe the origin of a page or its intended(!) use. That leads to the case that not only can a propaganda outlet mark itself as "info" - it's actually historically correct to do so as it's about what the host wants to communicate.

ICANN, the organisation behind the TLDs, actually always struggles with this btw. A more recent example was the decision which domain should be reserved for local name services. It took y long time (I think years overall) to get to: .internal (edited, brainfart)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would you mind telling the source of this? Looks intuitively right but... So do so many things :/

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Hm I was clearly wrong, I apologize! The excuse is that I was really tired and already quite "clickbait state of mind" ish.

Thank you for taking the time to write this! ♥

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Yes. And the "survivors" don't have a say in that if the person itself said otherwise before dying.

Training future doctors is a good cause and will most likely save lives in a similar fashion to donating a heart after all.

Edit: I removed a wrong part here claiming that the article is clickbait. I was off by a mile, see the reply to this post as to why.

view more: ‹ prev next ›