RideAgainstTheLizard

joined 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that if companies can't use their fancy packaging, they'll have a smaller profit margin on the actual good they're selling?

The system is very fucked!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

True. In the grand scheme of things, everything is destined to become waste eventually, all we can do is hope that it is useful waste and aim to slow its flow. I guess if compostable waste is more clean than ceramic/metal/glass waste, that is a point in it's favour, but maybe those materials can be cleanly recycled with proper care/planning?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Haha, I like your style!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Would this be a point in favour of washing dishes then? It results in more employment, but is this considered a win for the environment in this context?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This raises a question around the environmental impact of shipping banana leaves to places where they don't naturally occur and whether they'd last that long. although perhaps it would be a by-product of the process that already brings bananas to almost every store on earth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I remember cartoons used to have a common trope character who would build gadgets out of old junk in their shed. Now that we're living in a world with plenty of e-waste, it feels this trope never materialised. Where are all the modded smartphones or homemade robots? Is the cost of modding/fixing something simply higher than the cost of buying a new product?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Unfortunately these types of dedicated shops tend to be expensive - at least this has been the case for the soap dispensaries I've been to. Until they're more widely adopted, I guess that problem won't go away. It's an unfortunate paradox! I'd love for governments (or benevolent rich folks) to subsidise businesses like these so they can appeal to a broader audience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

100%

At a minimum, if a company wants to use a certain type of packaging for their products, they need to prove that they have the means to fully reuse it as part of their own mini circular economy. If their packaging is found at the beach, it can be placed into a bin, sorted and sent right back to them, and they're happy to receive it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

A friend of mine works in pharma research and said the amount of plastic waste is staggering. The general belief is that materials need to be sterile and this is the only way, however it sounds like they're beginning to question this narrative.

It sounds like a potentially lucrative problem to solve!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

For sure! However these are conscious choices that informed consumers can make. What I'd love to see is a world where an uninformed consumer can choose default products that have no impact on the environment because the government has made it so. No additional effort is required on the part of the consumer.

Want foodstuffs? Those are purchasable by weight and if you need a container they're cardboard or glass. Want soap? The store stocks bars of it or liquid by weight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Imagine if we had swarms of little insect-sized robots that could sort waste working alongside specialised organisms that then eat that waste.

view more: ‹ prev next ›