PastorHaggis

The first page of my resume covers my technical skills, a summary of myself, and my most recent jobs.

When you go past that, it gets to older jobs that are still relevant, then into school, then to side projects, volunteer, etc. basically, if you liked the first page, the rest of it gives them more about who I am.

I think at this point it's either 3 or 4 pages and every time I've gotten a job it's been one where they asked me about the hobbies on the bottom of the last page, which meant they liked what they saw and liked my interview well enough.

When I update it for my next search, I'll take my first internship off because it's no longer relevant, but most everything else is.

+1 to JetBrains.

I started using them like 8 years ago and have never looked back. My dad introduced them to me when I was doing some homework on a family trip and my laptop was dead. After that, I used them for every class in college, then used them at a job where they didn't provide an IDE but I had the subscription.

Even when I'm not developing at home consistently, it's just so much better to have it than not.

The PWA app works decent, but, unless I did something wrong, it would open links in itself instead of my main Firefox window which wasn't what I'd want normally.

I still use it, but it's definitely not as nice as I'd want it to be.

Definitely one of those things that's minor and I can look past though.

"This is the heaviest mother fucker known to man right here" ~ Jason Newsted

Hey, some of us are trying to do a huge server migration before we switch so that we can make sure all of our stuff is backed up properly.

I can't wait to go back, especially since proton is so much better.

Hopefully my Nvidia card doesn't suck too bad.

Sure, and there's also an extension to install a web page as an app similar to Chrome. The point is that, out of the box, it lacks some features that I enjoy. Extensions are great and I use plenty of them, but that doesn't mean that Firefox has those features, it just has extensions that have them.

Firefox is great, don't get me wrong, I'm definitely preferring it, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have all the features that I wanted up front.

I wasn't a fan of Firefox either and personally lived using edge. When the whole web integrity thing started happening, I felt like I should switch to Firefox and haven't looked back.

I still have some complaints, like you can't install sites native app which I used a lot. I don't think tab groups have been implemented yet, which isn't a huge deal but very useful. And there were a few others I can't remember off the top of my head. In the end I value my privacy a bit more so I've decided Firefox is worth it.

Plus mobile ad blocking is a god send.

The only part I'd disagree with is the "regardless of the crime" portion, purely because I do believe that there are people who have committed heinous acts and that death was a just punishment for their actions.

However, I do agree that I focused too much on the financial side of things and I definitely don't want to equate a human life to a financial cost. That job is for the billionaires. My reason for bringing that up was the idea that for those that have committed such heinous crimes, what is the overall cost (not just financial) to keep them stuck in a box for the rest of their lives? Especially for those that never rehabilitate (which the US penal system does a terrible job at anyway).

That said, after reading some of the other comments, especially the one from @StorminNorman, I've got some reading to do and may be willing to change my views on this. I'm definitely coming from a more conservative background (grew up very Republican, now I'm not sure where I sit) so there are some views that I have not had changed over the years, if only because I've not argued them. This would be one that I never had to argue as, at least in my circles, we never really discussed this view compared to things like gun control, healthcare, climate change, etc.

So I do want to make sure that I'm not just coming across as "we should just kill people for their crimes" because, like I said, I don't think it's that black and white and also I wanted to see other views because it's not one that I've had to argue until this point.

And that's absolutely a fair point. That's why I mentioned wrongful convictions in my comment originally. I know there was a story about a guy in Oklahoma who has been on death row for something like 20 years but then evidence came out that he was innocent. I'm not even sure they released him from prison but they finally removed his death sentence.

Horrible situation, and that's where I think we need reform in general because clearly our justice system has failed us in many ways.

My only counter is for situations like Timothy McVeigh, the home grown terrorist who bombed the Murrah building in OKC and killed 168 people and injured over 600, many of them being children due to parking his truck close to the daycare. It's reactionary, sure, but a man like that committed an atrocity that was proven, he admitted to it, said he was justified in it, and ultimately was put to death for it. To me, that is justice for his crimes, but it's also a very extreme example since most people aren't home grown terrorists.

Again, I'm not saying I'm an expert or that I'm even right, hence why I even commented in the first place because I want other views. I do think that the death penalty should be used extremely rarely if it's used at all, but I do still feel that there are some crimes in which the penalty is death. How do we ensure that we get it right though? That's where you have a point and maybe we can't so we shouldn't.

This is super interesting. Thanks for that! I knew that there were more legal costs but I wasn't aware that the overall costs were significantly higher. Obviously they want to make sure that someone on death row is guilty which takes more time, evidence, etc, so this does make sense.

I'll have to continue reading but from a brief overview, this is very interesting. Thanks!

In Pathfinder 1e, it mentions that high charisma can mean an attractive person. We know this can be true because my bard had a 36 cha (PF1e is broken lmao) and we all know it wasn't his personality.