Monk3brain3

Most games simulate the act of achieving something and losing breaks the simulation. Not that games aren't fun or enjoyable and some games are actually pretty interesting like nier automata

Well liberals love looking down on someone. It's a huge part of why they ride for their dip shit braindead ideology

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/democratic-party-elite-responsible-catastrophe/

From the article

"The key to understanding the Trump era is that the real divide in America is not between left and right but between pro-system and anti-system politics. Pro-system politics is the bipartisan consensus of establishment Democrats and Republicans: It’s the politics of NATO and other military alliances, of trade agreements, and of deference to economists (as when they say that price gouging isn’t the cause of inflation). Trump stands for no fixed ideology but rather a general thumbing of the nose at this consensus."

Just pure stupidity and ideology. But remember you can change the Dems from within 👍

I'm glad the Dems will eat shit. The same crap is gonna happen under Dems or Republicans. Now we don't have the fake face of the Dems to run cover for the imperialists

Still, I will be absolutely flabbergasted if we don't implement this sometime in the next 15 years

That's an excuse. They didn't suffer the Holocaust. We all have ancestors and human history wasn't pretty.

You're being ridiculous. I dont like fedoras or care what sam Harris or his racist pos group of new atheists say. Pointing out that people dying under capitalism find hope in religion doesn't make religion a progressive force. And me pointing out that religion can never be a progressive force is not me condescendingly looking down on these people. In fact I am more aware of the tragedy than you are in that their only hope (as they are genocided in real time on everyones social media feeds) is a complete dead end. And Islam has hurt Muslims far more than anyone else (although it's clear Christianity is the far more damaging religion) and I can recognize that because guese what I grew up Muslim.

And or a racist. I'm saying he is a racist and an atheist. The two are independent. But his racism finds a good home in Christian fundamentalism as it would.

I'm just trying to clarify what I meant and Ill be honest I have no idea what you're saying or arguing at this point.

Fair enough. Trash isn't the best word to use when discussing a sensitive topic.

Dawkins is obviously an atheist but a racist and the religious umbrella of Christian fundamentalism is a comfortable habitat for him.

The new atheists are just a bunch of racists and that piece of shit Dawkins literally calls himself a cultural Christian.

Also in case it isn't clear the religion most tied in with capitalism is Christianity and the religion that has caused by far the most damage and will continue to do so in the future is Christianity.

I think all this Islamophobic propaganda which is at its core an racist project and not an anti religion project has made people reluctant to see or unaware of the harm other religions cause.

Is religion a progressive force or not? I'm just here to point out it's not. Dressing up my stance with your imagined motivations is a you problem. And I actually think that religion and capitalism are so tied up together at this point that a post capitalist world will have to come hand in hand with a post religious world.