[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah, IOT is the version to choose at install with it getting 10 years of support compared to 5 years for the regular enterprise.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

Nice. Lot of games I've played on RPCS3 have run flawless as long as the wiki shows playable.

Ratchet and Clank and Uncharted trilogy are the ones that have issues and no PC port that I'm still hoping becomes ironed out some day.

But, nice to have one knocked off the list.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

That looks like a nightmare.

Windows 11 ltsc is interesting in that its like a time capsule. More like Windows 7 than 10. Has no Microsoft store, no onedrive, no game bar. And has old Microsoft paint, calculator, and notepad from Windows 10 with no tabs.

There's not really anything to uninstall. And it just gets security updates. Its a bare bones OS that feels closer to Linux because of that without the crap that even Windows 10 had showing tiktok and meta in the start menu to remove.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

I think social media for profit played a large role in getting a new generation of ad acceptance, since most use the official app with third party apps generally dead.

So they are going to get exposed to ads using it on their phones, and then there's the users themselves seeing social as something to try to use to make money so you got human being like living ads too.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Windows 11 ltsc comes with old Notepad. Looks like the same one from Windows 10.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Even Windows users don't like Windows. Unless someone is setting up LTSC to avoid feature updates to not get AI crap and ads I would avoid Windows for the average consumer.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

Chat control was one of the most notable signs that this is an issue around the world with it still popping up over and over in the EU. This is a global fight.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Its not restrictions that is the issue but the attempt to normalize handing out ID and face scans. It would have been more acceptable for them to flat out disallow restricted content than moving towards normalizing this type of entrustment of sensitive data.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't get it either. I see millions of followers but their streams don't give off a vibe of someone with charisma worthy of that type of obsession.

Most of them come off of as really obnoxious loud people ranting into a mic. Well...maybe it does make sense seeing the type of people society has rallied around to hold positions of power.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Companies get away with nothing but a small fine that is far less than the money they make from breaking privacy laws, and you are still naive enough to trust things handed over to them is actually private when there is zero transparency on what is going on with their app to perform an independent audit?

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 57 points 4 days ago

Bet they going to try to use it as an excuse to require age verification. They want to collect everyone's selfies and IDs for online accounts.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

No. That is just the nature of public social media. It comes down what you choose to share when it comes to risk, so the same amount as reddit.

But, userbases who behave more like old school forums are more likely to not share personal stuff like other social media such as facebook, Instagram, tiktok, etc which have drawn people who want to publicly catalog their personal lives.

For actual privacy that's better left to encrypted private messaging like signal and so on. Social media isn't the place to expect privacy.

view more: next ›

Lfrith

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago