Yes, they agreed they couldn't agree and then they agreed they could agree. And the verdict they could agree on was not guilty.

The Supreme Court already took this case. And to everyone's surprise, Roberts and Kavanaugh sided with the liberals and shot down the practice of racial gerrymandering. So Alabama really is being told "no". Again.

Not all the knowledge is there. Some ingredients are imported, in order to protect trade secrets and ensure global consistency.

After Russia took over McDonald's, customers did notice a change in how the food tasted.

He did more than make noise:

While the woman was on the phone with police, Donofrio broke a glass window on the front door "and reached inside to manipulate the doorknob," at which point the male resident fired the shot through the broken window

Regardless of what you think about gun laws, I think the resident had good reason to be concerned for his safety.

Up to 800 incidents when an employee illegally worked more than the maximum hours.

So that's over $300 per incident, which means the extra hours were not worth it.

If everyone knows that home prices will rise

Some people don't pay attention to forecasts. Some people sell because they need money now. Some people sell because they need to move now. Those people won't wait for prices to increase.

Nobody knows what will happen. It's a forecast. If I forecast 2% inflation next year, my forecast does not automatically cause prices to immediately increase. Next year, everyone will see if the forecast was accurate.

This is a federal trial.

And while some governors can pardon convictions, the governor of Georgia cannot. There is a Georgia state board that can issue a pardon, but only after a sentence has been served.

No. For example, most people who pirate software, movies, and music do not sell anything. But they are still violating copyright.

Just replace "Lemmy instance" with "blog", and the answer is obvious.

"consider a Mexican user visiting a blog located in Germany to view Nazi content."

The user is subject to Mexican laws. The blog owner would be subject to German laws. The instance owner is likewise subject to German laws.

Adding additional parties doesn't change anything. For example, if a Mexican user on a Swiss VPN views content originating from a blog in Germany, then the user, the VPN, and the blog are all subject to laws of their own jurisdiction.

Those laws can regulate what content you can access, what content you can host, or both.

If you are American then your Lemmy instance is most likely be protected by section 230, and you probably don't have to worry too much about non-pirated content. If you live in another country or host pirated content in the US, then YMMV.

Lifeprotip #1:

If you don't want an extremely high bail, then don't be a fugitive.

Lifeprotip #2:

If you don't want to wait 600 days for your trial, then don't file endless appeals after every pretrial hearing.

Neptune missiles are Ukrainian-designed and Ukrainian-made.

Consider who was asking the question: a Republican legislator with an axe to grind.

Now for the plot twist:

At last year’s COP27 climate summit in Egypt, the U.S. joined other nations in committing to a “loss and damages” fund for developing countries affected by climate change. However, unlike a reparations program, that fund is not considered compensatory and does not involve specific countries conceding legal liability

When Kerry said "No", he meant "Yes, but technically no." Which is the best kind of No.