Yes, I thought this is excellent. I hope some of them will walk away with enough inside knowledge of how things work there to know how to sabotage/cripple the company in some way/s later.
It's not gonna make them obsolete. It's gonna keep piling on technical debt from bad practices of which it's entirely unaware (not that it's ever "aware" of anything) while tricking dumb upper management, C-suite, and investors into thinking that it can render so many people obsolete, before it all crashes. "Pride comes before the fall."
Proof: the layoffs are failing to generate improved returns https://toast.ooo/post/13892904
So wear many different hats. Got it.
Now this makes me wonder if Lemmy has an equivalent to /r/ConfusedBoners.
Then it's your fault for not saying "uh" instead!
no mercy for ~~surveillance~~ capitalists!
There, all fixed now.
Nanobots of 90's sci-fi, here we finally come!
and get over my attraction to men
This wording stuck out as alarming. Do you see anything concerning about this as a motivation to try this, regardless of age?
The movie about her was absolutely phenomenal. I strongly encourage anyone interested in this stranger-than-fiction account to check it out.
I don't know if you've been keeping track, but TSLA's stock has been plummeting.

I wonder at what point repairs would be satisfactory for engineers to declare it usable again. Would it need to go on an empty test flight exactly along its normal path to be declared "safe enough?" What's the minimum incurred damage at which a plane would be considered totaled?