ExchangeInteraction

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An app that immediately, purposefully, crashes your phone.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Though I very much understand the sentiment, I would disagree with the reluctance to participate in bourgeois democracy. This is because there are significant short term consequences for the lives of marginalized groups (take for example, trans people in the United States). Therefore, until revolution is a reality, advocating for harm reduction is sensible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I understand, it seems we don't agree but thank you for participating in the discussion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would argue that the points you make strengthen my analogy, because all of them can also be said of DC electrical current.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This argument, as far as I know, relies on the nature of time dilation. You see as your velocity increases closer and closer to the speed of light, time itself begins to slow down. This is not an analogy or some fancy math trick, this is a real thing you can measure in the lab. As you get closer and closer to the speed of light time slows more and more. Such that as you reach the speed of light (again this is physically impossible at least for anything with mass) you can think of time as stopping. So for light or anything that moves at the speed of light they're kind of isn't such a thing as time, but I digress.

So (again even though it's actually impossible), what happens as you start to go faster than light? Does this trend continue? If it does that would mean that time starts to reverse. And once you see that faster than light travel might imply time reversal, it should be easier to understand how this would violate causality. Because how do you get event A caused by event B when event B was before even A?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Speech, like all sound, is a wave that moves back and forth parallel to the direction of motion. This is the context that I describe it as AC.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

DC as in direct current, while AC is alternating current.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't understand you point. Is what way is talking like frequency modulation?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

bad, the app said the post failed. Will be deleting them extras. Lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My bad, the app said the post failed. Will be deleting them extras. Lol

 

Error being blown out of your mouth is similar to DC ( direct current ) and that it's a continuous wave of air with frequency zero. While speaking is like AC ( alternating current), a longitudinal wave that moves back and forth at a variety of frequencies.

 

I've wanted to contribute to open source projects for years. Ive contributed to a few things in the past, but my expertise just isn't in programing (I'm a physicist), so it's hard to contribute meaningfully. Recently, I've heard about some open source silicon manufacturing and I'm intrigued, this is something I think I could contribute to significantly. I know of LibreSilicon, but I want to learn about other projects as well, and are there good resources to learn about the current state of projects. Thought I'd see what y'all know.