[-] [email protected] 60 points 4 days ago

Not the way he eats it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

rip gay step-brother, you are stuck in heaven now

[-] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

Our triple triple-Ds!

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

... and some of them have social anxiety ...

[-] [email protected] 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

... have the Feds not bombed a private residence for a long time?

I know of 1985 but I'm sure this is a more regular occurrence.

There must be a list, but I can't find it on Wiki.

(To clarify if unclear, the explosives used in this case was to damage the door, not to bring down the building.)

[-] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No.

Anyone with a platform can do that.

(And from the little bits I've seen, mostly over memes & various news bits, the quality is questionable. Just don't follow the whims of influencers, it's not the correct way forward imho, it just inevitability leads to or spreads enshitification.)

[-] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

^ historically/statistically there must have been a sailor serving in some navy with the nickname Moonshine.

But also just for fun:

[-] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

this is a commonly repeated ~~falsehood~~ obvious joke

And, if I have to explain the joke: it's just E=mc² (the Einstein thing ... well, the Einstein's thing's approximation), the energy (E) is the same for all mass (m) since the c is a constant.
You get the same 21 billon kcal from 1g of apples as from 1g of plutonium.
And since it's usually well known humans do not devour mass into pure energy that might trigger ppls sense of humour.
(Additionally the idea of eating metal to seek nutrition might be funny, but we do need some metals \m/.)

Also "potential energy" phrasing is weird in that context.

There are 2 different definitions of calorie.
This "fun fact" mixes up the two definitions

It's not even two definitions, the kcal is absolutely the same, it's just used to measure two different things (mass energy vs the sum of what an average human can extract via chemical processes). I see you def understand that, but it's not a different definition of a calorie (in the same way as length vs width of an object isn't a different definition of a metre).

[-] [email protected] 28 points 6 days ago

Equivalent-level of fun fact: 1 gram of hay contains that much calories too!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago

Zomg, where are all the warning labels???

[-] [email protected] 217 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I mean, you can heat any old rock & make it look like that ... what I'm saying is that every rock, when heated to 500+°C, will gain delicious orange flavour, but scientists don't want you to know that!!

1
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28431423

The theorem has been expressed colloquially as "you can't comb a hairy ball flat without creating a cowlick" or "you can't comb the hair on a coconut".

116
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
238
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0500341/characters/nm0801838

Credit/sauce:
cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3964820

I'm imagining it delivering nuggets to guys in the trenches over barbed wire and mustard gas.

397
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

... someone linked this in a Discord server and it's just too horrible not to repost.

Would have turned the switches the other way around tho.

view more: next ›

Evil_Shrubbery

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago