Mmmm, yes, very wise.

I fully agree. Companies should belong to the people that allow I to turn a profit, and that is, well, every employee. The founders could still remain the CEOs if they do a good job and are elected to do so.

The foot for your distraught friend/partner in prison is cold, damn I like these old ad campaigns.

So progressives must decide whether they hide from the term, enabling the fearmongering, or openly embracing it to show there is nothing wrong with it.

I've been wondering, what if they just ran in the opposite direction? Don't call it "state-owned industry" or "collective ownership", but instead "Hypercapitalism: every citizen is a shareholder!"

Exactly, the wording is extremely important when talking about policies. People like "helping the poor", but people hate "welfare", because that's communism or something.

I didn't, but I'd have looked up some basic information about a country I'm dealing with in an official capacity if I was the PRESIDENT OF THE US.

That Epstein killed himself

No further arguments needed.

Ahhh, prison for people who can't pay their debt, where they accrue even more of it since they can't work... Could this possibly go wrong?

A month from now:

"Disallowing company owners to whip their employees makes the cars too expensive!!!"

Disappears after some time: ✅ Mutates people and plants: ✅ Makes an entire area unlivable: ✅

The scene in episode 1 where they looked into the exposed reactor core was amazing