In theory: yes, most likely. In practice? No.
Darukhnarn
joined 1 year ago
„Bürgerliches Bündnis“- oder anders formuliert: „AfD ist schon geil autoritär“.
I’d argue Dresden is rather nice, along with being home to some of these people, it would make them really feel their defeat I think.
Pigs definitely have a social intelligence that at least rivals those of dogs, if it doesn’t surpass it. Just because we keep them in a way that traumatises them from an early age on, doesn’t mean pigs aren’t socially intelligent. Wild boar and the like form highly complex social structures and are quite able to communicate in between one another. The only thing pigs actually express more than dogs is the utter disregard for anything but their own survival when under duress. This however might be explained by the way they reproduce. Pigs are K-Strategists, whereas dogs aren’t.
Usually you’d go to the bank with the project and they ask you for securities, oftentimes the house your building or the ability to garnish your wages. Also they demand to know how much you’ve saved so far. Can’t give loans to everyone?
Why not? The concept is fairly easy to grasp and if I want a loan for a house, the bank can ask me to prove that I was able to put aside enough money beforehand to be able to chip away at a credit from now on.
Have you ever been to a movie so terrible that you saw people leaving the theater? Which one was it?
And rightfully so. That movie was an utter atrocity.
If you can opt out of it, it’s not a tax. It’s an insurance. Taxes pay for everyone.
Dogs would be a good example for ring species, which show the outer limits of the species definition, if they they occurred in the wild in their many diverse forms. But since they are not, I’d group them as one species still, as their origin is artificial and so are, at least partly, their means of reproduction.