Hey look Innuits aren't real colonised people bcz they exist in an area that is north of Britain.

Badempenada's book called "why revisionism is cool actually"

Of course, usual ableism from britbong land.

Next off "we gonna cut all disability benefits AND ban the autists from working, bcz fuck you go to the gas chambers now."

Welp, once the Chinese EUVs come online then it's bye bye to the western tech sector.

Jesus, I mean to be honest I live in the south east (aka the part of the UK that effectively leeched of the rest of britbong land when we began to enter the end stage of capitalism) and even down here I wouldn't exactly describe the situation as great, sure you do get actual protein in your food parcels here but it's only slightly better to be honest, and your certainly not getting enough food to meet your required caloric intake per month that's for sure.

To be honest I think the government is doing it on purpose, in the place I work at we have more than enough food (for fuck shake I was literally having to squeeze in what I could.) probably so that the proles will be too starved to riot (probably won't work mind you, believe me the Tsarists tried this in Russia and all it led to was for the peasants and proles to Join the Bolsheviks.) but yeah, in my opinion most foodbanks absolutely have enough food to go around it's just that the government wants to starve the proles so they don't have the energy to revolt.

I actually work at a Foodbank and I can tell you if people are having issues getting stuff from a Foodbank it ain't because there low on stock, that's for sure.

Like seriously last Tuesday we had issues simply putting away all of the "donations" (in air quotes because most of our supply comes from Tesco's and friends, not from like dudues leaving donations or anything.) so if foodbanks are utterly incapable of doing much it ain't because we got a lack of supply.

Actually thinking about this we usually don't give out much food per donation, like, for a family of four for instance we probably make up like 4 boxes or something like that, which is basically fuck all to be honest especially for a family that size, like I guess if you wanted to be generous it would be enough for 1000 calories per day per person, which again is on the generous side of things, certainly nowhere near the recommended caloric intake for men and women.

TL:Dr, foodbanks are probably holding back on the donations they give out even when you do get vouchers, so yeah, fuuunnnnn.

Yeah, this is like utterly bullshit.

Housing prices in china have generally been on the decline since 2021. Really there hyper focusing on like down town motherfucking tier one city apartments despite the fact that chinas infrastructure is so advanced that is is more than possible for someone to live in the cheaper outskirts of town and simply commute by train or bus into the city (this is fairly common in like Hong Kong, onto where living in the city is fucking awful but the wages there aren't that bad, hence most people simply live in nearby Shenzhen and NOT bamboo scaffolding city )

And then you provide them with the sources and they'll say "oh, that's just Judeo Bolshevik Propaganda, now here's a source debunking it." - proceeds to post Nazi/Neo-Nazi propaganda.

Eh, it sorta does but it's a bit confusing to an outside observer because obviously enough Iraqi ba'athism is probably more closely related to fascism of National socialism then it is actual socialism, while typically the Ba'athism practiced in Syria was more closely aligned to actual socialism, well for a time at least (Bashar Al Assad eventually decided to drink the lib juice and effectively torpedoed the Syrian economy with liberal economic reforms, and hence kicked off the Syrian civil war so, fun.)

Either way the more accurate statement would be to say is that ba'athism is ultimately a Arab nationalist ideology that has two, almost entirely distinct branches.

Right-wing Ba'athism, the sort of Ba'athism practiced in Iraq before the Americans decided to invade and then effectively turn the country into an Iranian puppet state.

Left-wing Ba'athism, practiced in Syria which then eventually got dumptered by liberal infiltration (Bashar Al Assad) and then hit the shits at mark 8 velocity.

Either way Ba'athism is for all intense and purposes a dead ideology, that failed due to the inherent contradictions of all regimes (even socialist ones) built without a class base, this is the same reason why Nassarism failed as well, btw, so yeah, tl'dr, even your trying to make a socialist state then your first priority should be to root your politics on that of a class line, something that Nassarism, Left wing Ba'athism, and quite a few others failed to do (though Nassarism could in my opinion but still, and maybe left wing Ba'athism, maybe.)

I mean yeah, though to be honest I think after WW2 Stalin was dealing with a shit load of stress (well, even before then, during the begining of operation Barbarossa the guy has a massive mental breakdown for like more than a week, probably due to the sheer speed of the German advance and how it looked to be almost unstoppable at the time.) so I think Stalin trying to resign in 1952 was likely due to stress related reasons, not to mention if Stalin simply resigned and well, didn't die of either stress or poisoning (not that it really matters since the guy who may have did the poisoning was killed like 5 nanoseconds after Stalins death.) then it's likely that a seemly succession process could of been held which would keep out cringelords like Kruschev or Beria.

Basically the moral of the story for future or current AES states, if your amazing leader wants to retire, then let him/her, sure you'll lose their guidance but there's probably a reason why they want to retire yknow?

Pretty much this, after the whole (industrialising the entire country to the point that we can outproduce most of the Axis combined, even after loosing a shit load of territory during WW2) Stalin was effectively trapped in his position for his remaining days, plus I think it should be noted Stalin died really young (like 53) so most members of the Politburo and Supreme soviet didn't really think Stalin had any real reason to resign, if Stalin didn't die from his heart (or more likely , poisoning from Beria.) then it's likely Stalin would of been leading the USSR well into the 1970s considering the average life expectancy of the USSR at the time.

Lol, I mean I know malekov is like a trillion times better than kruschev and beria but still, kinda a bit of a L considering if Stalin was allowed to resign then it's unlikely a power struggle would of happened that would allow for the cuckold reformists to take power (yes, I am saying Stalin being prevented from resigning in 1953 did indeed kickstart the series of events which lead to the fall of the USSR)

I mean hasn't the Venezuelan opposition been effectively defunct since 2022?