Naps, the best daytime cure for woke.
Atelopus-zeteki
Unimaginable is entirely the wrong word here. It's prosaic, it's old, tired, worn out corruption. Completely imaginable by the idiots who are being allowed to do it. There is nothing new, creative, original at all about this. smh
SMH! Damn, it's so hard to convince people to get on the fedi, and crap like this makes it harder. I got the blsky account to appease a friend. k, back to work.
I just signed up for bluski, and it offered the option of running it from my own server. So decentralization appears to be possible. The more people use this option, the more decent it will be.
It was some time ago that I read of that, so the details are fuzzy. And here's what I found:
https://nypost.com/2019/07/25/10000-year-old-engraved-stone-could-be-worlds-oldest-lunar-calendar/
“A 10,000-year-old engraved stone could be a lunar calendar. The rare pebble — found high up in the mountains near Rome, Italy, the hammer-stone was found on top of Monte Alta in the Alban Hills. It’s believed that our early ancestors would’ve used the stone to keep track of the moon’s cycles. Notches were engraved “as if they were being used to count, calculate or store the record of some kind of information. And these notches — which total either 27 or 28 — suggest the stone’s engraver used the pebble to track lunar cycles.” ref
It could also have been The Ishango Bone (https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-ishango-bone-the-worlds-oldest-period-tracker/)
Cool, well I could just give up, but that's not my style. So point of use filtration for now, and keep working on solving the larger problems piece by piece.
still projecting, I see.
Hrm, my state reps voted yea, nay, and not voting. Got some letters to write.
Yay, keep eff'ing up corp.soc.media. We'll gladly absorb your disgruntled users.
No argument there. This crap should not be in our environment at all. How do we get 3M, DuPont, etc to pay for our filters?
governmentsecrets.pdf , Ha! Gotcha!
"both sides the same"? Is that really your level of intellectual rigor? smh