top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 176 points 11 months ago* (45 children)

Controversial take (though maybe not in this community):

If it's needed for survival, it should be free. No exceptions.

  • source
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 120 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    I would much prefer my taxes go toward making insulin to give away than bombs to give away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    I'd even, gasp, go so far as to say I'd happily give it away to citizens and illegal immigrants alike. Oh hell, everyone on the planet. No strings attached.

    This is where my taxes should go. I can't stand the rhetoric that it's bad tax payers are footing the bill for those without insurance and those here illegally. That's what a society is supposed to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

    Devil's advocate: Medi-CAL (California's Medicaid program, already known for being very permissive) will likely already cover it for the eligible, and should the $11 be used in aggregate to cover distribution and manufacturing for all of California's citizens, it would be a reasonable rate to keep the program self-sustaining.

    Allotting an exception for the payment for those who may have difficulty seems like a reasonable way to cover any gaps while making sure it never runs into the red.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 133 points 11 months ago (54 children)

    No need to stop at insulin.

  • source
  • hideshow 54 child comments
  • [–] [S] 85 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    We’ll see how many red-staters cross state lines to buy their evil, demonic $11 insulin.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 62 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    As a Newsom hater, I have to admit this is a big win for everyone. While he's still very far from an actual solution to the country's root problems - you can vote for him (if that's an option), and then continue protesting and pushing for more reforms. I'm not quite as optimistic to believe this will happen, let alone succeed, but it's an idea.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 31 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Newsom can be shamed into doing the right thing. Trump/Vance/Miller will disappear the shamers. Completely different realities.

    The most transphobic version of Newsom is a return to needing several doctors to write a letter saying you are trans. We're already seeing Trump denying the right to exist and forcing the next generation of trans kids into navigating black markets for T shots or forced to grow with the wrong hormones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 43 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    $11 per month, that's only about double what it costs in most of the world. Wait... Still $11 PER PEN

    Wtf did it cost before!!??

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    I don't want to go down the rabbit hole, but I'm wondering is this ia CA paying the difference on what would be price gouging, or CA actually controlling the process, to erase any opportunity for that price gouging. That latter would likely be permanent, the former would last only as long as the administration isn't seeking budget cuts.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 11 months ago

    I fucking loathe Newsome - but this is hard to complain about

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (23 children)

    For comparison...

    In Aus I'm paying ~$32 for 25 pens

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago (18 children)

    We have it decent in Australia, but for the Americans reading on, the bar is so ridiculously low you can walk over it.

    I hope one day Medicare can actually be universal, and not the private subsidy model we have currently.

    I dunno about you, but finding bulk billing is a pain the arse now, and in certain areas it simply doesn't exist. Not to mention my premium mouth bones which aren't covered for some stupid reason.

    I just wish we'd finally kill off private health. Private health is such a scam we only take out because we have a two tiered system and there's a tax discount.

    I really don't like Australians talking about how good we have it, when it's kinda meh, and actively getting worse.

    That all being said, yeah, the PBS is pretty good and I'm glad insulin is affordable.

    Thank Christ we didn't get the Libs back (for American readers, that's the conservative party), we could do SO much better given how wealthy we are per person.

    But, anyone who doesn't want to pay more in tax in order to get truly public healthcare doesn't know how to do maths. We could just pay what we pay in private health premiums already, in tax, and we'd probably get way better care per person (because profit is inherently inefficient).

    Abolish private health.

    Thanks for being accosted with my rant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 32 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Holy shit, I can't believe this is real

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 28 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Hey look! A liberal doing some actual fucking liberalism for once. What a nice change of pace.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago

    Newsom is all over the place. Sometimes his position is straight from the GOP playbook (criminalizing being homeless) and sometimes it is liberal like this. He is trying to be everything while preparing for a '28 presidential run.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    US trying to do a single thing not-for-profit challenge (apparently possible).

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Some of the only good government policy I've seen in my lifetime.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Definitely a win! It's important to note what type of insulin this is, insulin glargine (a long acting insulin). For those who are already on Lantus or Toujeo it will definitely be a plus. Hopefully next they'll do short acting insulins (lispro and aspart)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 18 points 11 months ago (25 children)
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (13 children)

    Is he actively, continuously transphobic, or was it just that time everyone talks about? One time is too many, but there are way worse folks for sure. I don't really follow Californian politics though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    He just vetoed a bill that would have allowed trans people to legally stockpile a year’s worth of hormones. This happened during a time when Republicans are floating national HRT bans for trans people of any age. His excuse was that this would somehow raise healthcare costs… By paying for a year’s worth of medication that people are already on and are going to stay on for the next year. It is a flimsy excuse and he’s a POS for it.

    He also vetoed a bill last year that would have expedited licensing for out of state doctors who moved to California if those doctors practice gender affirming health or mental health care as part of their practice. This is a big deal not only because it’s shitty, but because there’s an expected increase in trans patients after care is banned in other states.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 17 points 11 months ago

    It’s not clear in the article, but I think this insulin is actually being manufactured in the US.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civica_Rx

    “Civica is growing U.S. generic drug manufacturing capabilities with a new 140,000 square-foot sterile injectable manufacturing facility in Petersburg, Virginia, representing a $124.5 million investment”

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    Born with immune system that destroys its own insulin producing cells -> forced to pay $11 a week (depends on person) for the rest of your life.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I'm curious about the formula. My wife has jumped around a few different insulin companies and while they all had the same active ingredients, the inactive ingredients played a major part in her absorption.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 13 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    We can't afford this, Argentina needs $40 billion so their leader can get a haircut that doesn't make him look like the manager of a rock band in the 70s.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    Can't wait for the border checks for "illegal" insulin

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›