[-] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

Stochastic Lugism. Every single rich or ghoul death will make people ask "is this a class thing?" even if the answer is "no". But as long as the question is asked, it'll be part of the collective consciousness.

42
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
37
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

With Chad and Senegal joining Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger in demanding the withdrawal of the French military from their countries, a surge of sovereignty continues to ripple across the Sahel.

18
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Our latest study explores how the decline of Global North hegemony has shifted the geopolitical landscape and opened new possibilities for emergent organisations of the Global South.

This study by The Tricontinental (Vijay Prashad's institute) was published earlier this year.

I find it is worth a read (or re-read) in order to evaluate the accuracy of our predictions and our current reality given the instability in NATO's ranks and recent push for WW3.

It covers the historical formation of the form of modern-day imperialism, and their definition of the current stage as one of "Hyper-Imperialism" (a collapse of distinction between subimperialist powers under a completely US-led imperialist bloc against the rest of the world), and a geopolitical-economical definition of the world between the Imperial North (grouped into "rings", from core to periphery) and the "Rest of the World" South (subdivided into 6 subcategories).

Then it analyses the decline of the "Global North"/"West", through the cannibalisation/vassalasation of previously independent imperial powers such as Japan or Europe, the waning internal legitimacy of Liberal Democracy, and the stagnantion of the economy for countries in the bloc.

Part V describes the changes to the world order, from a "southward shift" of the global economy, to the imperial policy of trying to isolate and contain China's economy, finally ending in a growing Imperial push for war as the only recourse remaining in order to retain their hegemony.

The epilogue briefly elaborates on a possible new world order built over multilateral organisations such as BRICS, the SCO and FUNC for the advancement of shared interests of Global South states.

It's a worthwhile read, and it's available in English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Arabic and Chinese, and has a PDF format version for download.

The peaceful rise of the Global South countries, led by Asia and especially China, poses a comprehensive economic challenge to imperialist world dominance. For the first time in 600 years, the Atlantic imperialist powers are confronted with a non-white economic force capable of countering them.

The fault lines of Ukraine and Palestine have exacerbated the polarisation of the social democrats, sections of whom have proven unable to overcome their desire for acceptability and join in a robust movement for peace.

Let us return to the quote from NATO and the EU that they would be ‘protecting our one billion citizens, preserving our freedom and democracy… against all threats’. This sentence, appearing in the first paragraph of the NATO-EU 2023 communiqué, clearly outlines the structure of today’s world: the imperialist camp, centred around the US and based on NATO infrastructure, is fully united and mobilised militarily, politically, and economically, ready to stifle any emerging forces that might pose a threat to their hegemonic status. This unprecedented immense imperialist pressure has forced many in the ‘rest of the world’ (those outside the imperialist camp) to identify alternative structures and identities for self-preservation.

12
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
34
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This sounds like a warning. US embassies will probably be on the list, though I think a more direct warning to civilians will be made before they actually strike.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Although he's being opportunistic here, Labour is actually being the one to call leftists "woke and antisemitic".

This petition comes after Labour backing down on even their most milquetoast promises and enacting the same austerity, transphobic and warmongering program of the Tories, but this time red.

Personally, I'd be happy to see them go as the current Blairite leadership is materially equivalent to the Conservative party for both the British and international working class. Possibly it'll be a chance for Corbyn's new pro-Palestine faction to make some gains.

46
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

According to the guidelines, any petition that asks for a change to the law or to policies gets a response from the government after 10,000 signatures. After 100,000 signatures, petitions are considered for debate in the parliament.

35
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

On November 20 a nationwide general strike was called in Greece, public and private sector unions joined the call. The demands were various: wage increases, labor rights, increase funding for several social services, repeal ongoing privatizations. Additionally the Communist Party of Greece (Marxist-Leninist) [KKE (m-l)] was present in many cities of the country, issuing local calls and presenting its contingents in the mobilizations, as well as they made a statement: https://kkeml.gr/20-noemvrh-oloi-sthn-apergia-oloi-sto-dromo-enantia-sthn-eksathliwsh-kai-thn-tromokratia

In this statement the KKE (m-l) joined the demands by the workers as well as presented other demands such as the expel of the NATO and Yankee military bases, the end of the EU policies and the necessity to raise the solidarity for Palestine and to demand its freedom.

Didn't see this reported here.

43
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Below is the text of [Dan] Cohen’s address to the UN Security Council.

Distinguished members of the council,

I am an investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker, one of the few independent journalists to report from Haiti in recent years. My most recent film is titled Haiti: Intervention versus Revolution.

The UN Security Council is being asked to approve deployment of another so-called “peace-keeping” mission to Haiti. Let us recall that Haiti has been under U.S. and UN occupation for 21 of the last 30 years, from 1994 to 2000 by UNMIH, UNSMIH, UNTMIH, and MIPONUH, and from 2004 to 2019 by MINUSTAH and MINUJUSTH. However, those two plus decades of occupation never achieved their stated goals. Dan Cohen is a well-known independent journalist who has covered Haiti intensively over the past four years.

In fact, UN soldiers, under the familiar pretext of “combating gangs”, in one operation that became emblematic of their conduct, wantonly fired some 22,000 bullets into the slum of Cite Soleil, killing residents in their ramshackle houses. These UN troops were also responsible for crimes against the Haitian people, from the introduction of cholera to the rape of children, for which they were never held accountable. Now, the Haitian people are being asked once again to let UN troops occupy their nation.

Yet it is clear that there is another agenda at play. The United States’ government, my government, seeks to impose its will on Haiti, with or without the approval of this council.

Don’t take my word for it. In December 2021, China and Russia voted to limit the Security Council mandate for U.S. trainers to the Haitian National Police to only nine months rather than the 12 months that Washington sought. This outraged U.S. Senator Robert Menendez, then the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. During a briefing to his committee, Menendez rhetorically asked a State Department official: “Why do you think China and Russia stopped us?” He answered his own question, saying: “They want total unrest in the hemisphere, that’s their whole purpose in this hemisphere, is creating instability.” He added, “At some point we have to think about how we circumvent that.”

In 2023, Washington indeed found a way to circumvent the UN Security Council when it was prevented from once again using this body, as it did in 1994 and 2004, to further its interventionist goals in Haiti. It concocted the Multinational Security Support mission or MSS, which U.S. representative to the UN, Jeffrey DeLaurentis, called “a new way of preserving global peace and security.”

Indeed, the United States has enacted legislation known as the Global Fragility Act, which might be better described as the Crumbling Empire Act. This bipartisan legislation, signed into law by President Trump in 2019 and continued under the Biden administration, seeks to combine military force and soft power to push back against the growing influence of China and Russia, which Washington, still applying its long-discredited imperial Monroe Doctrine, sees as a threat. Haiti is the pilot case for this new strategy, which the U.S. openly stated it seeks to apply to so-called fragile states around the world, beginning with Libya, Mozambique, Papua New Guinea, and Benin, Ivory Coast, Ghana, Guinea, and Togo in West Africa.

This intervention assumes that the Haitian people are incapable of solving their own problems, an insulting notion to those who know Haitian history. An intervention would be, first and foremost, a violation of Haitian sovereignty. But even more so, it would empower and support the forces which have carried out the most heinous acts of violence in Haiti today.

My outlet, Uncaptured Media, in collaboration with Haiti Liberté, recently published footage we obtained of a Haitian National Police officer summarily executing an unarmed civilian, picking his pocket, and then running over his corpse with an armored vehicle provided by the United States, ostensibly to fight gangs. This is not an isolated incident. A September 30 report by the Panel of Experts established pursuant to Security Council resolution 2653 addressed to the Security Council’s President noted that “From 1 January to 31 March 2024, 590 civilians unrelated to gangs were killed or injured during police operations against gangs.” The document cited reports that police officers had carried out extrajudicial executions as seen in the footage we published.

One must also note that the Kenyan police forces sent to Haiti under the auspices of the MSS have an abysmal human rights record going back decades.

A 2009 report by the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions Philip Alston found “death squads operating on the orders of senior police officials” killed 1,113 people following Kenya’s December 2007 elections. Little has changed since then. Even the U.S. State Department’s Kenya 2018 Rights Report noted “unlawful and politically motivated killings; forced disappearances; torture; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions.”

Any UN operation would work hand in glove with these corrupt and murderous Haitian and Kenyan police officers.

The proposed UN intervention, like that of the MSS, is a violation of Haitian law and the UN Charter. Haiti has no elected government, but a regime effectively appointed by the outgoing U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken. Interim president Leslie Voltaire, who most recently requested UN military intervention, has zero legal authority, like former Prime Ministers Ariel Henry, Garry Conille, and now Alix Didier Fils-Aimé. Not one of them has ever been elected nor holds any respect or legitimacy outside of Washington, DC and this building. That such an illegal intervention is even being considered is an insult and affront to the Haitian people.

From my numerous visits to Haiti in recent years, it is clear that the overwhelming majority of the Haitian people do not want another intervention. In 2023, as this council considered whether to bless the MSS, Haitian popular organizations hung banners across main thoroughfares in Port-au-Prince saying no to intervention and reminding the population of the cholera outbreak it introduced.

The only sector of the Haitian population that supports an intervention are the tiny few who stand to benefit from it, who disproportionately live outside of the country, and who profit from the status quo of controlled chaos. They are the corrupt oligarchs who funded the armed groups to do their bidding and have now lost control of them, and those who Washington’s soft power arms like USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy have groomed as its preferred future leaders of Haiti.

For anyone who naively believes that foreign armed intervention would benefit the Haitian people, one only needs to examine the results of previous interventions, and remember the old adage, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

In fact, this proposed intervention could be worse. Haiti is awash in military-grade weapons imported from the United States, thanks to lax gun laws and porous borders. An intervention would meet stiff armed resistance and cause bloodshed to the Haitian population and among UN troops. Haiti’s history is marked by its resistance to foreign invasions from its glorious 1804 revolution to today.

Haitian sovereignty must be respected, but first re-established by the Haitian people themselves. Let Haitians, not foreign bodies, choose their leaders and their future.

Thank you.

14
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It said the order told members to keep their families out of Kyiv's government district and quoted parliamentarians as saying that, for the moment, the next sitting was not scheduled until December.

60
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The United States shut its embassy in Kyiv on Wednesday morning due to what it called the threat of a significant air attack, a day after Ukraine used American missiles to hit a target inside Russia in what Moscow described as an escalation in the war.

Can't allow any good American citizens to die in the obvious consequences of their actions.

4
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
43
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

In July Mr Putin doubled the federal bonus for those signing up to fight from 195,000 roubles ($2,200) to 400,000 roubles, which regional authorities are supposed to top up. The government is committing vast sums on compensation to the families of those killed in action. And Russia’s splurge goes beyond war-related spending. Mr Putin is lavishing money on welfare payments: in June he raised pensions for some recipients by close to 10%. The government is also spending big on infrastructure, including a highway from Kazan to Yekaterinburg, two cities 450 miles (729km) apart. Indeed, it is spending on pretty much whatever takes its fancy. Mikhail Mishustin, the prime minister, recently boasted about a government scheme to pay for children to holiday in Crimea.

"Lavishing" on pensions. Imagine trying to paint that as a bad thing. Wonder how Yankees feel when they find out that the country they're blowing hundreds of billions on to wage useless wars has free healthcare too.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What always annoyed me about Democrats defending Biden is when they lean on calling it ableism or ageism. Apparently he did have a stutter when he was young, and that was used to explain some of his earlier gaffes.

Problem is, this still assumes the guy still "deserves" to be president, despite clearly being awful at it, stutter or no stutter, old or young. If the job description is basically just doing inspiring speeches and press conferences, and the guy can't do it, it's not ableist to want some other person.

But even worse, it ignores that Biden will never face the true horror of being disabled or old while working class. He would never had been at risk of losing his home, starving or even being arrested or institutionalised had he lost the election, because he's rich and connected.

By using the aesthetics of fighting ableism, but ignoring the material conditions of most disabled people, liberals made a mockery of it all.

#MoreElderlyWarCriminals

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Halfway through, I didn't notice any new interesting information. For anybody who has been paying any attention, his positions are the same as always (maybe a bit clearer on the origins of Ukraine), but now being broadcasted to millions of Statesian reactionaries.

I think the content is far less important than the impact this is going to have on the Republicam base's position on the war. We might have a gosh darn "anti-war republican campaign" this year.

But it was very "interesting" to see Putin trying to explain to Tucker Carlson of all people that Nazis are still around and denazification is important.

Live editing if interesting things catch my eye.

Edit 1: at around 1:09:00 Carlson asks him whether is there any truth of him having ambitions to conquer all of the continent. And Putin replies in the clearest way possible, with live translation, in one of the most warched interviews of the year that: no, that'd be dumb, it's just US military propaganda to get more budget.

Again, nothing new for anybody paying attention, but could do a nice agitation video for tiktok/shorts if anybody here is good with that.

Edit 2: if you want to die from blood alcohol, take a shot every time Putin mentions interactions with other important figures, but adds something like "I'll not give any details".

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

One commenter on the RT article put it very well.

Anything else I wish here for the Northwest will probably be a crime.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

A guy wearing a Guy Fawkes mask helping a cop wash tear gas off of his face is an image I never thought was possible. Zionists have managed become everybody's enemies.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

It might just be my lack of knowledge of the smaller European countries, but this is such a niche thing on a community that is technically not supposed to be an explicit anticommunist thing, that I feel this might be fedposting.

It's a neat trick, post something that confirms previously enforced biases, but not interesting or topical enough that many people will know about it and push back, or actually bother to research it.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

the Haitian general who fought against the French in the Haitian Revolution, and thus had a hand in genociding many remnants of the white slave-owners… to create the first abolitionist country.

I've had a socdem acquaintance literally imply that forbidding white people from owning property in Haiti was racist, and that it was a good thing the USA occupation (of which they'd had just learned about) changed that because it "recognised people's human rights." That might be too hard a test for some of them, considering most probably can't even find Haiti in a map.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

In contrast with liberal "democracies" we can see how they treat referendums as this random thing done with a year or two of preparation, and that whatever is the outcome is the will of ~~God~~the people, which is immutable and can only be tested once in a generation, so long as they benefit the ruling class. Brexit got voted for, therefore it must happen no matter what, but the indyref didn't get the 50% so better wait until all Scots die of old age. And when the result of the referendum goes overwhelmingly against the ruling class interest, like in Donetsk/Luhansk or even in Catalunya, then it must've been stuffed ballots, and it was illegal, and no we won't redo the referendum to test that hypothesis.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Holy shit what an infuriating article. Europe has its head so up its ass that it looks like an inverted Ouroboros and yahoo couldn't even put the name "CELAC" in the headline, going instead for "EU-LatAm". Doesn't even mention basic shit like el bloqueo. Anybody have a more in-depth and less europhile source? In Spanish works too.

"Idiots manage to ruin incredibly important meeting of 60 countries to talk about some other country" should be the actual headline. Every day nationalising all European property in LatAm seems like a better idea. Gringo bom é gringo com fome.

Edit: the complaint about the article was not meant as an offence to the poster, just to how bad "white" newspapers portray the same countries their beloved gringolands depend on to exist as if they're just afterthoughts.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

Yeah, there's this general trend where "Western" media and their offshore subsidiaries only care about people if they're famous, white or both. This was my main criticism of the coverage of the war in Ukraine when it started because from the start it was very disproportionate compared to other conflicts in peripheral nations. I guess it's hard for newscorps and liberals to talk about those in-depth because they'd need to acknowledge "that poor and non-white people are humans deserving of dignity", which is a controversial statement among their peers. Not to mention their favourite parties and corporations having a stake in killing and displacing those poor/non-white people.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

AlbigensianGhoul

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF