Right, sorry that's what I meant to type which got corrected to "exit". When I tried it it would be exported as a separate set of json files instead of being part of the images. Glad to hear that's not the case any longer or that this tool can automatically handle it.

Bold of you to assume he is sober enough to remember anything.

If we go by personal experience, we recently had the time of several people wasted troubleshooting an issue for a very well known commercial Java app server. The AI overview hallucinated a fake system property for addressing an issue we had.

The person that proposed the change neglected to mention they got it from AI until someone noticed the setting did not appear anywhere in the official system properties documented by the vendor. Now their personal reputation is that they should not be trusted and they seem lazy on top of it because they could not use their eyes to read a one page document.

Thanks for the info. Just got into Linux gaming recently and appreciate the first account stories since much of the internet seems kind of useless nowadays for looking up facts unfortunately.

I had a little self made amp as well. That thing could go loud, you had to be careful (I messed up the resistor or knob that controlled the volume and instead used the computer settings because $ to order another part). 30% was very loud 😀

Maybe the GRADLE (Go Roll And Do Little Else) probe will come to the rescue.

(Not a real thing, just a Java-ism).

Or insider trading.

Not sure if you've seen this video: https://youtu.be/hksVvXONrIo

But it explains what I saw when typing on the later updates for my old phone.

Identity theft is not a joke ~~Jim~~ Mfat!

There's something called NAT reflection that does a local lookup if the request originated in the internal network and avoids going via the external route. Some software for routers like ONPSense and/or PFSense support it (but I wouldn't be surprised if DD-WRT, Tomato, etc supported it as well (its been a while since I used them)).

It might work better of your DNS provider supports API based challenges vs traditional ACME challenges that might require you to still expose your IP/challenge ports with public DNS to get your certificates.

All my internal DNS has the option of SSL certs while my IP is not on any public DNS and it routes to the internal IPs with the above. Not sure how that would work with wireguard or tailacale/headscale, but I'm assuming they probably could complement nicely.

That was also the conclusion of this video on the Speed channel for older version of things vs new one (included tools, shoes/undershirts, etc - I would ignore consumables that expire but they were there for s&g it seems):

https://youtu.be/I4C62HC1HSo

Thanks, didn't know there was a potential workaround. I'll give it a try since it gets a little annoying when the phone is in my pocket..