01189998819991197253

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not just you. It didn't make sense to me either, which is why it struck me as odd, and why I kept a separate backup. This was a long while ago, so things, it seems, have changed (unsurprisingly with NC, for the better).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Question on NC. The last time I used it, it stored all files in a db (sql of choice). Is it still doing that? Or are they in a folder structure now? I had an issue where the db file got corrupted, and I lost everything. I had a folder structure backup, because I didn't trust sql for file storage, but it's the reason I haven't gone back to NC.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago

You can't post that. Racism at work is illegal.

What happens if we're racist at work?

You get fined.

So, legal, but just not for free.

-__________-

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Fair point. Blockchain might be the quickest to implement just because the infrastructure is already established, even if it's not trivial. Not sure, though.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

That's what happens when you shoot a laser though Windows lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It likely could, but it's not trivial to implement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

That's what I also understood. It's just an odd, almost incorrect, phrasing. Unless our understanding is wrong, and they actually mean that they won't follow the local laws if said laws require them to violate privacy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Nope. All concrete.

Why, it's the splishiest splashiest place on the planet!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

It's a very odd place to go on fire!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Like foozbawl!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a fan of automated data collection, regardless of the reason. I see the merit, though, but I won't allow it. The post is very clear about the preserved anonymity of the collected data, which is good, and on how to easily opt out, which is great.

This statement, however, was a bit strange. Almost like they are being flippant on local laws. Since I know this isn't the case here, they should have phrased it different. (Emphasis mine)

Your search activities are handled with the same level of confidentiality as all other data regardless of any local laws surrounding certain health services.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

TIL about CachyOS. Thanks!

view more: ‹ prev next ›