The Lemmy Club

947 readers
25 users here now

Welcome to The Lemmy Club!

Instance Rules:

  1. Don't be a dick.
  2. Racism/slurs/etc use will not be tolerated.
  3. No spamming.
  4. Don't harass other users (See rule 1)
  5. NSFW content must be marked correctly.
  6. All content must comply with US law
  7. Loli/etc. will not be tolerated. Suggestive or sexual art must be reasonably recognizable as adult subjects.
  8. These rules apply to all content and users that appear on The Lemmy Club. Moderation is on an as noticed/as reported basis. If you see rule breaking content, I likely have just not seen it yet. Please report it.
  9. Instances/users/communities that tolerate, repeatedly fail to enforce, or allow content that breaks any of these rules may be banned from The Lemmy Club.
  10. The site admin team (well, just @bdonvr really as of now) has final say in interpretations of all rules.

Help contribute towards our operating costs to keep us going and growing: https://opencollective.com/thelemmyclub/

We host MLMYM (a clone of old.reddit) at https://old.thelemmy.club

We host Voyager (a mobile optimized webapp) at https://app.thelemmy.club

founded 1 year ago
ADMINS
bdonvr
AutoAdmin
listing: all - local
search
1
409
Republican group cites Dred Scott ruling as reason Kamala Harris can’t be president (www.independent.co.uk)
 
 

The National Federation of Republican Assemblies (NFRA) has cited the infamous 1857 Dred Scott Supreme Court decision, which stated that enslaved people weren’t citizens, to argue that Vice President Kamala Harris is ineligible to run for president according to the Constitution.

The group also challenged the right of Vivek Ramaswamy and Nikki Haley to appear on Republican primary ballots.

The Republican group’s platform and policy document noted that “The Constitutional qualifications of Presidential eligibility” states that “No person except a natural born Citizen, shall be eligible, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

The same document included former President Donald Trump’s running mate Ohio Senator JD Vance on a list of preferred candidates for vice president.

The group, which adopted the document during their last national convention held between October 13 and 15 last year, goes on to argue in the document that a natural-born citizen has to be born in the US to parents who are citizens when the child is born, pointing to the thinking of Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

2
104
Republican group claims Kamala can't be President, cites Dred Scott case (www.independent.co.uk)
 
 

The National Federation of Republican Assemblies (NFRA) has cited the infamous 1857 Dred Scott Supreme Court decision, which stated that enslaved people weren’t citizens, to argue that Vice President Kamala Harris is ineligible to run for president according to the Constitution.

The group also challenged the right of Vivek Ramaswamy and Nikki Haley to appear on Republican primary ballots.

The Republican group’s platform and policy document noted that “The Constitutional qualifications of Presidential eligibility” states that “No person except a natural born Citizen, shall be eligible, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President

“An originalist and strict constructionist understanding of the Constitution in the Scalia and Thomas tradition, as well as precedent-setting U.S. Supreme Court cases ... have found that a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ is defined as a person born on American soil of parents who are both citizens of the United States at the time of the child’s birth,” the document states.

The group then cites six cases including Dred Scott v Sandford. The 1857 ruling came a few years before the 1861 outbreak of the US Civil War over the issue of slavery, stating that enslaved people could not be citizens, meaning that they couldn’t expect to receive any protection from the courts or the federal government. The ruling also said that Congress did not have the power to ban slavery from a federal territory.

I thought this was some kind of op, like someone making a fake Republican org and putting out an unhinged policy paper. Citing Dred Scott is crazy, especially since it doesn't seem to have anything to do with the argument that she's not a citizen.

Archive link: https://web.archive.org/save/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Famericas%2Fus-politics%2Fkamala-harris-president-supreme-court-b2601364.html

view more: next ›