"data driven understanding" basically means "I forcefed oatmeal into a VCR "
End result is slop either way
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
"data driven understanding" basically means "I forcefed oatmeal into a VCR "
End result is slop either way
Are liberals so bored they start assigning numerical values to how sad they feel about forum posts? Or is this the liberal tendency to attempt neutrality or sound unbiased? "Sweetie, your post calling me a "Zionist bootlicker" scores really high on Toxicity and Personal_Threat. If you're not careful I might have to increase your Antisemitism ranking."
Can't liberals actually respond to leftists without pretending we're a sociological pathogen to be dissected and monitored
Can’t liberals actually respond to leftists without pretending we’re a sociological pathogen to be dissected and monitored
Nope, they're not even past phrenology, malthusian 'thought', and 'white man's burden' yet; and appear incapable of moving past those.
It's funny that they have the word "understanding" in the title even though they demonstrate zero understanding of anything
When dumbass stemlords say sociology isnt a science (it is) this is what they're thinking of
I love those network graph filler images. I can just scribble on a piece of paper for 15 minutes, label some dots, and it would have about as much information contained therein for the reader.