this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
578 points (98.3% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 146 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They complain about political correctness, and they go and do shit like this.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Political correctness: I can't say what I want!

Conservatives Later: it's now illegal for you to say what you want

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

As is fascist tradition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There is no "good conservative" alive today.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

When the flip flopper in chief, Mitt Romney, is your only hope, or anyone named Cheney, we've got massive problems.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not that I disagree with you.

But even as a staunch Euro leftist, I think it is okay that there are people I strongly disagree with, even strongly dislike because I think the fight for values that are against my personal morality.

Both Romney and Cheney are such people.
I don't think they should have political power over other people.

But they share at least a certain common ground with me that the fascists don't.
And for how little I actually like those people, I still value this very difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Maybe some of them need to be less alive

[–] [email protected] 106 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is a blatant first amendment violation. Another pro-gamer move from the free speech party.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Devils advocate here, in some places, deliberately using the wrong pronouns with the intention to harm someone would be hate speech.

So flip it around, using the preferred pronouns is considered an attack on the child and/or their shitty parents.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Hate speech is protected by the First Amendment, so flip it around, inclusive speech is also protected by the First Amendment. I'm sure teachers can lose their jobs for hate speech but people cannot be criminally charged for hate speech alone. Prosecuting teachers as sex offenders for using pronouns is a clear and deliberate violation of their Constitutional rights.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

preferred pronouns is considered an attack on the child

If the child doesn't want to be called that it's not their preferred pronoun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 6 months ago (8 children)

I really can't comprehend the level of hate that these motherfuckers must possess to write or support such a bill. I mean, let's say you're an incredible asshole who doesn't think that trans people exist, like you think that you know who they are much better than they actually know themselves. Even with that as a baseline, isn't it still just the polite thing to treat them with basic respect?

If I found out that someone I just met preferred to use their middle name instead of their first name, I would 100% use that person's middle name when addressing them. It's just common courtesy. The same thing goes with a person who's transitioning - I will use their preferred name, because I'm not a completely deplorable piece of shit.

But this guy is way worse than someone who intentionally antagonizes people by using their disliked name when addressing them. This guy wants to actively punish anybody who has the rock bottom bare minimum of civility by destroying their lives and livelihoods.

I just can't grasp that level of hatred. How is it that this piece of shit shares enough genes with everybody else that he's recognized as human?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, further diluting the term sex offender down to the point the label is meaningless.

Makes perfect sense to combine teachers who accept pronouns, with people caught publicly urinating on the same list with violent rapists and convicted pedophiles.. after all, it's all the same.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The right is full of pedophiles and rapists so this works for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My honest reaction to news coming from USA these days:

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ditto. But I'm in the USA myself.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's difficult to differentiate between real news and The Onion now days. It's like... Comical but also terrifying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ fuck these GOP assholes so hard

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 months ago (2 children)

HAIRCUTS! HAIRCUTS OF THE WRONG GENDER ARE PART OF THIS BILL!!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Dafuq kinda haircut is gendered?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Any haircut underneath which stands someone Republicans want to oppress.

Just ask Darryl George.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

kim jong-un approves this law

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As a practical result this is more of an attack on education than an attack on LGBT, who would want to be a teacher under such tyrannical rules?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

They're getting two birds with one stone.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (7 children)

How is anyone supposed to know anyone else’s pronouns without asking them?

Are the teachers supposed to check the genitals of their students at the beginning of the year?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago

I feel like that’s what the right wants. They’re weirdly interested in that

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Naked lessons.. naked schools.. that way the sneaky trans kids also cannot change during the year.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But if everyone is naked, the poor boys will be distracted. I mean, they already veer off course when shoulders are out. I guess the only appropriate solution is to not have the girls at (naked) school. /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh excellent point. All naked boys only and girls only schools. That will definitely resolve the issue and has no chance to backfire.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

study to be a teacher in Missouri
teach full time for $30,000/year or something
become a sex offender, obviously can't teach anymore
can't actually find a job at all
forced to live in a designated trailer park for pedophiles
become a lifelong welfare recipient

nice one, conservatives

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is how it starts, people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Dumbass bills are introduced all the time. The news likes to bring them up but never talks about most of them being shot down though.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Don't like your teacher? Just flip your pronouns real quick and get them on the sex offender list. Problem solved.

Fuck this bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I vote we make all politicians sex offenders to see how they like it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Most of them already are... but I get your point.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

I hate that these are usually rage bait titles, but this is legitimately terrifying

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Okay. Everyone is a they/them. No binary gender for anyone. Hedge your bets and play it right down the middle.

Problem solved

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fuck Missouri Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

Missouri deliberately impoverishing themselves is par for the conservative course.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Two years ago I would have said no worries, there's no way a bill like this can pass. Now? Let's just say I don't take anything for granted.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Just give politicians prison time for wasteful laws like this. It's objectively a waste of taxpayer's dollars used to fuel hate crimes. Fuck them, they should get 100x the risk and accountability then the poor paycheck to paycheck teachers they keep overly focusing on.

load more comments
view more: next ›