19
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Who else would you use them for??

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I oppose Poilievre being in government.

It’s hard to understand why his opinion should carry any more weight than mine.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

It starts here, Canada. Abortion is next.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Sigh.

I'm so sorry Gen Z, Gen Alpha. We've let you down.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

So many words on this topic, so few of them addressing the obvious questions about why doctors might have a use for "puberty blockers" or what legitimate basis politicians could possibly have for wanting to abolish them.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Aren't puberty blockers more reversible than puberty?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. So upon seeing that headline, my first thought is that "for kids under 18" is rather suspect phrasing. Like someone wanted to get "kids" in there no matter what.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The decision to use puberty blockers should be based on a conversation between a young person and their doctor, Boissonnault said.

“I don’t see M.D. after Pierre Poilievre’s name or Danielle Smith’s,” he said. “So, not their business.”

THIS RIGHT FUCKIN HERE

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
19 points (95.2% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2857 readers
56 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS