A bill set to be introduced next month would ban consuming or producing sexual content and punish offenders with prison sentences of up to 20 years and $25,000 fines.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 146 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Bet you, every single one of the cunts pushing for this would have to immediately be convicted under the very same laws.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 123 points 2 years ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Like American Marijuana laws, the cops didnt really care about people smoking weed, it was a convient way to put black people in jail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    They want something to feel special about. Conservatives love getting away with stuff that is "wrong" and since society has normalized a lot of previously "wrong" behaviors these people no longer have anything to feel special about. Subjugating others is how they get off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 82 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    So they basically just want to abolish free speech? This is the first step in that process. Once they get one law passed about something like porn it makes it super easy to amend that law at any time to include anything the state deems to be "dangerous".

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 78 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 66 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This guy has the look of someone with a rape dungeon

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    any “acts of sexual intercourse,” including those that are “normal or perverted, actual or simulated.”

    So there goes the majority of mainstream movies too, I guess 🤦

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I would propose expanding the second part to include oral and written delivery, not just digital. The only valid form of sexual dialogue is to be dance.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago

    That's harsher fines than being an insurrectionist.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    What is with the steady criminalization and paranoia with all things sexual in the last 15 yrs or so? It feels like more than the usual paranoia.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I believe it is how self-proclaimed christians are responding to sexual and gender liberty/tolerance. They see it as lost ground in their crusade against deviance. So they are escalating things beyond reason in order to sooth their own conscience.

    That's how I see it. Closeted bigots being closeted bigots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Next, having a vagina out of wedlock will be illegal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The lawmakers pushing this should have their browsing history and message logs examined by a team of data recovery experts.

    I can assure you, they are into some weird shit but they spout these bullshit platitudes about turning others away from sin. It's almost certainly because they are embarrassed or insecure about their own desires.

    See also : every right leaning politician who was secretly closeted gay

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

    MOST porn is art because it has a camera as a medium, and it is viewed as "Entertainment", this bill will have no teeth on arrival.

    My main problem is that this kind of logic is next door neighbors with, "That woman was dressed in a pornographic way! She should be dressed from head to toe in black!"

    Edit: correction

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Guess they'll have to disconnect the Internet in Oklahoma then.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Can anyone tell me which year it is in Oklahoma? It can't be anything starting with 20, 19, or even 18, that's for sure.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Oh fuck off.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    This is either something that will only ever be selectively enforced, or designed to be so outrageous they can walk it back to what they actually want and look like they're compromising.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I imagine there are still brick and mortar stores in Oklahoma that sell porn and sex merchandise. This would ruin their business. What a bunch of idiots. This will never survive a challenge in court.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    "Listen here, I'm doing the lord's work!"

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›