this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
948 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Has the appearance of a transient ischemic attack. But apparently "he's fine"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 298 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wow. That does not look good.

Can we have some term limits, please?

[–] [email protected] 111 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Can you imagine how many problems simple term limits would fix?

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Term limits empower lobbyists and career staffers and encourage legislators to give less of a shit about their constituents. I know "career politician" is often considered a dirty word, but having competent, knowledgeable elected officials is a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They are already openly corrupt. Term limits would result in younger candidates in touch with this century. Lobbyists would also have to bribe new people. It might also break up the ridiculous 100% party voting.

Not to mention help with our Supreme Court problems. Randomly giving appointments that last decades to whoever is president in at the time is insane.

I really don't think we have that many competent elected officials anyway.

Yes, eliminating gerrymandering and citizens united would be more effective, but I wouldn't kick term limits out of bed.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have term limits in Florida. They have done nothing to solve any problems, and arguably have made the quality of our officials worse, while giving much more power to lobbyists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

None of that has happened in the states that have term limits. If you think Republicans, no matter how long they have been in office, are going to start putting anyone other than Federalist Society drones on the courts, I'm not sure I can have a good faith argument with you.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't think term limits will solve anything near what people pitching term limits as a panacea think they will solve.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Dude went full Beaker.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 259 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh goodness, I hope it's nothing minor.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I generally don't wish ill will on people. That being said, this asshole isn't a human in my book. He's just an evil hate filled pile of shit, and it will be a great day for democracy and America when he does die.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I want to be very clear: I will never support or condone violence. But when this parasite dies (from natural causes), the entire country will be massively better off for it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 219 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

proof that old fuckers shouldn't be allowed in politics due to a literally dysfunctioning brain

EDIT: to say 'ageism is bigotry' is a gross oversimplification. I'm not prejudiced against people above a certain age, I'm against the idea of allowing individuals with dementia or other degenerative conditions having political control over other people while literally having impeded brain functioning and judgement.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 year ago

His birth is closer to Lincoln's assassination and the abolition of serfdom in Russia than to 2023.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

I’ve had some relatives reach a very old age and this kind of thing is just part of the territory.

However my aged relatives were not in positions of great power. Neither should this man be.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 172 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conservatives when Biden does something like walk the wrong direction: omg he's senile and clearly has dementia!

Conservatives when McConnell (maybe) has a fucking legit seizure: everything's fine, nothing to see here.

[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both of them need to get the hell out of politics as should anyone over the retirement age.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Enough with the septuagenarians and octogenarians in the government. If you're going to drop dead from old age at any moment, you shouldn't be in any government position, especially not a national/federal one, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (14 children)

How about hemberders? Or Tim Apple? Trump talks and walks like he's have constant brain aneurism, yet not a single peep form his idiot base.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

Or covfefe. Or falling down a 5-degree decline. Or desperately gripping a bottle of water with two hands to carry it to his Queller Demon mouth.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 year ago

I don't believe that it's discriminatory when I say that people with severe neurological disorders and dementia shouldn't be making laws.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The US of A is governed by dying greedy geriatrics

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He is 85. What the fuck drives you besides greed and power to stay in Congress past your 70th? He will probably die in a couple of years, but still clings to this power trip with bare hands. Just illustrates how fucking greedy and corrupted that mf is.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that the type of incident you should be immediately going to the hospital for? And to maintain some shitty image of power they just yank him to the back line and have him stand there?

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Man it took waaay to long before someone even reacted and even then they didn't focus on his well being but on the press conference.

What a sad sight, zero empathy

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago

Not like the man is known for his empathy himself. So it's a bit of a FAFO situation I feel.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's one of the few people in this world on my "no empathy for him" list. I would've just sat back and had some popcorn

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thoughts and prayers that he has some incurable medical condition.

He's been a piece of human garbage all his career, so let's not sugar coat things now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Anyway, remember how hard he worked to take away benefits from 9/11 first responders?

I have no sympathy for this man, anybody else want to just reminisce about the horrible shit he's done instead?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republican, Democrat, Independent, Goat-Sacrificer, Whatever; we all need to vote in people that are actively working to improve the future. You know, the one boomers don't even believe in...

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For now, that's democrat. I know I know two party system sucks etc etc but we need to stop the bleeding before we try to walk again.

Trump and the GQP have set us all back 2 decades and they aren't done dragging us down.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

100% agree. We have to halt and try to undo the damage they are actively doing to our country (Supreme Court, anyone?), then we can focus on our antiquated "first-past-the-post" system...

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Is it bad that I hope this is a sign of medical issues that will force him into retirement? I'm sick of a misogynist turtle calling the shots.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (18 children)

NEW CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

No person shall hold an elected or appointed position past the age of 10 years younger than average life expectancy, to be updated each census year. A special election is held to replace the person when this age is reached in the case of elected office. A new appointment required in 30 days for appointed positions.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No wonder America's laws are so outdated, they're made by guys who still think the 20's were the "good ol' days"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately he seems to have recovered, was back out there walking and talking again before too long. Still, an encouraging sign.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You should have to take physical driving tests every 2 years past age 65 to keep driving.

Yet we let these senile millionaires legislate our lives.

Putting aside being the worst President since Jackson on policy alone, we let drooling Alzheimer's Reagan maintain his hand on the nuclear button for years, with the help of his traitorous wife, putting all of us at risk for no other reason than to protect the "Reagan Legacy." Aww, he didn't want to be embarrassed, so we had no one at the wheel in the late 80s who could reliably remember how to tie their own shoes in the event of a global crisis, much less the names and vital details of every major world leader as they should.

I'm sorry if it makes me ableist to say, but having dementia/Alzheimer's means that the most important decision you should be allowed to make until your death is what you want for lunch. When You're broken and a danger to yourself to others, fuck your legacy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did the demon animating his corpse finally depart?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

Lmao

The libs bending over backwards to lick his arse in the name of "civility" despite spending every single day of his life working to kill the poor and inflict maximum suffering on the working class in the name of extracting the largest amount of wealth into bougie pockets all deserve the same suffering. The man has killed thousands of people with a pen. Frankly this only happening to him now that he's 81 is far less than he deserves.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

We are governed by senile folks who belong in a nursing home not ruling over us.

load more comments
view more: next ›