this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4489 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Houthis vow that US and UK strikes on their positions in Yemen will not go without "punishment or retaliation"

The Iran-backed group pledges to continue its attacks on ships in the Red Sea and its support for Hamas in Gaza

Overnight military strikes by air and sea targeted 16 Houthi positions including command centres, munitions depots and air defence systems, the US says

President Biden says the action will protect the free flow of international commerce

British PM Rishi Sunak says the strikes were "limited, necessary and proportionate action in self-defence"

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer backs the action, but some opposition parties say Britain's parliament should be recalled to debate it

The Netherlands, Australia, Canada and Bahrain provided support as part of the mission, says Biden

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Guess it was a show of a military might more than anything, so other countries wouldn't even move while Israel levels Gaza. And I doubt many even cared for them. Poor bastards stood against the dictatorship and now set as a nationalistic, brutal and overly religious military junta. Many of them didn't even have any chance at life at all being born in the islamic North Korea. But they probably didn't know the original NK has China when it shoots in the sea, and Houties just don't have any backing while doing their acts of terror. Or didn't care? Or just gambled?

If Iran encouraged (or even ordered) them to shoot, USA and allies then shot back, and only Houties lost in the end. A line of sixteen pawns, all knocked off in one cock wiggling blow of the allied MICs. That's what they (or rather their administration) were aiming for? They've found a very weird way to support Palestine.