I don't know what a .webp file is but I don't like it. They're like a filthy prank version of the image/gif you're looking for. They make you jump through all these hoops to find the original versions of the files that you can actually do anything with.

Edit: honestly I assumed it had something to do with Google protecting themselves from image piracy shit

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 235 points 3 years ago* (19 children)

The format actually has a lot of benefits - it supports transparency, animation, and compresses very efficiently. So it could theoretically replace GIF, JPG, and PNG in one fell swoop.

The downsides are that many apps don't currently support it and that it's owned by Google.

Personally I use webp for images that are not intended to share (e.g. banners and images on my blog), but stick to JPG/PNG for sending to other people.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 152 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    and that it’s owned by Google.

    I mean yes, but it's patent irrevocably royalty free (so long as you don't sue people claiming WebM/P as your own/partially your own work), so it's effectively owned by the public.

    Google hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer implementations of the WebM Specifications, where such license applies only to those patent claims, both currently owned by Google and acquired in the future, licensable by Google that are necessarily infringed by implementation of the WebM Specifications. If You or your agent or exclusive licensee institute or order or agree to the institution of patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that any implementation of the WebM Specifications constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, or inducement of patent infringement, then any rights granted to You under the License for the WebM Specifications shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed. "WebM Specifications" means the specifications to the WebM codecs as embodied in the source code to the WebM codecs or any written description of such specifications, in either case as distributed by Google.

    Source: https://www.webmproject.org/license/bitstream/

    (But Dark, that's WebM not WebP! -- they share the same license: https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/g/webp-discuss/c/W4_j7Tlofv8)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    And here comes jpegXL claiming the same things. Fun times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 128 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    You would like it if you had slow internet, or you hosted a website.

    My website turned 5MB images into 100KB images using webp. My website now loads instantly, saves you bandwidth, and me costs!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    Wait really? Are they that much more efficient?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Yep! Not least of all, GIF & JPEG are over 30 year old formats and WebP is about a decade old. So there's at least 20 years of advancement there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 78 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (9 children)

    You only dislike it because whatever bad app you're using to share them on doesn't support them.

    Stop being the gullible fool and start hating the apps not the file format.

    Edit: I also spot your .gif favouritism in there. .gif is an archaic and wasteful format, and asking for it is the same as looking at your car and whining that the fuel has no lead.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    The guy clearly isn't familiar with a lot of image formats and is trying to find out about them by asking, a perfectly reasonable thing to do, and in a special community called no stupid questions, no less.

    You don't need to call anyone a gullible fool and furthermore you've not actually helped to answer the question "what is webp", at all. What are you trying to achieve with this pointless aggression? If you wanted one less "gullible fool" you'd have to answer the question and educate, at best you've sown confusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 65 points 3 years ago (37 children)

    Webp is an image format.

    Jpg is ancient, and gif, holy shit gif is from stone age.

    I dunno, if you're playing a video, you probably want x264 or better these days, no? For music, we use some variant of mp4 or lossless at this point.

    Yet with pictures, for some reason we insist on the old shitty stuff.

    Using jpeg or gif is like using mp1 for music and VideoCD for video. Come on now.

    The only problem with webp is that there's quality loss if you convert an already compressed jpeg into webp with high compression rate, like some web sites do. That can suck, but I don't know how else to get people to use more modern formats. Otherwise we'd be using ancient formats into the 24th century.

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • load more comments (36 replies)
    [–] 62 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    It's just a new picture format that is arguably better than jpeg in many scenarios. It has been around for many years. Windows just refuses to do file associations correctly, so people hate it for no reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 54 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    Here's a Firefox extension that adds right-click context menu options to save the webp as PNG or JPEG:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/save-webp-as-png-or-jpeg/
    and its GitHub page:
    https://github.com/jscher2000/Save-webP-as-extension

    Makes it a bit easier than downloading the webp and converting it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 49 points 3 years ago

    It's a image format with extremely good compression that's tiny doesn't look bad. As someone who had shitty internet for years I definitely welcome them but as usual with Googles inventions they push it on to everyone and let other browsers catch up.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Webp is a fairly standard if rather new image format, that are frequently used by websites due to their small file size. To further cut bandwidth costs and loading time, websites will often only include a tiny webp of an image until you click to expand or something like that, so that they don't have to serve a massive image if the user will only even see a thumbnail sized preview. However, this does break the "save image" button as if you try to download the thumbnail, say from google images.

    Completely separately, some scummy sites will make you sign up for an account or something to download a full size image, and the only advice I have here is that it is almost always faster to find another site with the image then jump though the hoops.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 40 points 3 years ago

    Just a way for Google to influence and force change on end users away from previously accepted standards, a strategy that allows them to further obfuscate attempts to DRM all media to make sure only authorized parties can play in the sandbox. Don't worry, they're trying to move the entire browser that way as well. Mandatory ads and mandatory DRM that can scan your cache and local files for possible violations are coming right goddamn behind it all.

    WEBP is effectively a container format warped into a media compression format, it's strength that's actively exploited is obviously in saving a little bandwidth by (further) compressing and serving smaller sized cached webp files of existing jpg/png/gif/etc files to end users.

    PNG (and JPG for that matter) has worked just fine for static image files for decades, but that was a community project created to work around the patent encumbrance of GIF so there's not money to be made and nothing to embrace/extend/extinguish by the big patent happy corps by allowing it to retain status as a 'standard' in active use. Bandwidth, processing power, and storage have come a long way since PNG started giving us better quality than JPG's inconsistent compression artifacts.

    /waves old man cane around in the air in a threatening manner

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Can someone give me an example where webp gets in the way? I've been using it for a while and both macOS and Windows seem to support the format without any third party extensions for a while now and so do the Affinity apps.

    I can use webp like any other image format at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 33 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Webp is a more modern image standard built for the web. Gif has major limitations, and animated gifs are actually bigger in size and worse quality than video files - these days, very few gifs you see on the web are actually .gif files. A while back imgur started converting them to mp4 behind the scenes.

    Webp was built with animation in mind, so it works like gif and with much better file size. Even though it's relatively new it should have decent support in most programs that have been updated in the last few years - so you shouldn't necessarily have to jump through hoops to use it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago

    WebP is awesome (JPEG-XL is awesomer though). It compresses better than JPEG which was introduced 30(!) years ago. It's time for JPEG to go away.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Why do so few apps (besides browsers) seem to support it? E.g. Win10 photo viewer and seemingly all my messaging apps

    The format itself sounds good, and I see it everywhere online, but is there some reason it's unsupported?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Google being fucking Google.

    I downloaded the Save By Type extension because it was impossible to some of my schoolwork this term due to the webp BS.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I didn't know this either.

    "Google launched the WebP format as part of its mission to make loading times faster across the internet. WebP allows websites to display high-quality images — but with much smaller file sizes than traditional formats such as PNG and JPEG."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 20 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I hate them because my image viewer of choice doesn't support them and never will because supposedly the developer died and never released the source.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    My image viewer of choice will never implement it, they replied when I suggested, because the spec isn't standardized. And because they consider themselves photography viewer/editor, not an image viewer. Understandable.

    The webp is a format used exclusively for web graphics with no practical use in digital photography, moreover, the technical documentation is not really standardized so it makes it really challenging to ensure 100% support. Mainly for those reasons, the webp is not supported in ZPS X

    Im using it because it got the best tag manager/tag browser, not for the photo features.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    webp is cool, but I much prefer JPEG-XL

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Since nobody’s mentioned it yet, GIMP is a free and open source photo editor available on Mac, Windows, and Linux that can open .webp files and save them as a different file format easily.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›