The rust devs agreed with you...
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
94 points (93.5% liked)
Programming
17024 readers
117 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I used to only use C#, and I liked the simplicity of only using one symbol to access any prop/field/method. But now I've used Rust for a while I do prefer separating the two for the same reasons you mentioned.
So no, you're not alone. Even cross-lang!
C++ was my language of choice for a long time, but I can't say I'm with you on this one. If I'm going to use Vec, I had better know what it is already. Littering the code with a special double-glyph operator when a dot would do is just needless noise to me.
(I won't criticize you for liking it, though. Cheers.)
I don't agree. Many languages differentiate in terms of standards. In Java, your objects start lowercase, so if you see uppercase, its a static call.
:: looks nice, I guess, but many languages and standards improve clarity of code.
in java ovjects start lowercase
by convention only though
That's just convention.
:: is enforced by the compiler.
Yeah, but does that matter? I don't think, I've ever accidentally broken these conventions, where compiler assistance would have been helpful.
Also: :: in Java is method reference. In Kotlin it's reflection.
I'd say if you care a lot about distinguishing contexts it's really the job of the IDE to highlight syntax.
Don't write code as though you're going to read it in plain text imo.
I like how Java uses it. As a C# dev I wish for it sometimes.
Yeah, kind of curious what Go does here then / what the actual experience is like.
It abuses casing for public/private, so presumably there's no way to see whether a given sequence of letters is a variable or a type.
In Java, your objects start lowercase, so if you see uppercase, its a static call.
Not really, that's just the way a specific coding style was specified. You're free to refactor all your projects to follow any other coding style if you really want to, and your programs will continue to work just fine.
Anything is fine as long as it's not an arrow (I'm looking at you, PHP)
Sweats nervously in C pointer
C is the cool grandpa of today's programming languages so he can get away with this
Nobody would cry if it disappeared tomorrow though
I don’t understand the C++ hate. I’m definitely biased since I learned it before anything else, but the flow of the code and the object-oriented principles just make sense to me. And yeah, I appreciate the scope resolution operator a lot.