this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
144 points (99.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6608 readers
567 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A guy in a safer bush with a $1k drone has a 70% chance of hitting the guy with the RPG.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago (4 children)

A guy in a Ghillie suit with a 100$ knife has a 70% chance of stabbing the guy with the drone.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Something something... 70%... bacon cheeseburger... heart disease.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

And the cheeseburger was only $5!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

they were too well camouflaged so the tank crew couldn't see them and backed over them reversing out of the drive

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

It's turtles all the way down

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dude with a 2000 dollar thermal sight is gonna clap the guy with a javelin. Also any tank made by a competent nation (i.e.: not russia) will have thermal sights on their tank specifically to find some fuckboi on the bushes with a vibecheck tube.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Not to mention the myriad of other anti AT weapon tech like all the warning systems, IR smoke, and trophy systems. Now the Abrams X is real heckin fright

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago

If you have a handful of tanks, your enemy has to spend a lot of effort on getting rocket launchers. Not just buying them, but also the logistics strain to get them to the frontline.

And if you notice the enemy forgot to bring their launchers, you can deploy your tanks, and exploit their mistake.

Mass tank assaults are over. But using them as an integrated part of a force still makes sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just run over the fucker if he's only 200m away.

Tanks are obsolete. Embrace killdozer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Friendly reminder that Marvin Heemeyer was a damn lunatic, in case there's any killdozer enthusiasts here. If he didn't kill anyone other than himself, it wasn't for lack of trying. He had every reason to believe there were fucking children in that library, and he wanted them dead. Fuck Marvin Heemeyer, may be rot in hell forever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

CIWS for every tank. Do it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

10 dudes in a bush vs 10 dudes in a bush.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Time to start a bush selling business. They gonna be in high demand.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

"Welcome to the Raytheon farm!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Or an agent orange business.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

We can fit more in one bush... Get the Clowns.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Oh no, are tanks obsolete again?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Russia will pivot on it at some point. Closer they come to running out, the more they'll look for an excuse around not fielding them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

meh tanks are the prime beasts of urban combat

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn't urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

pretty sure theyd be worse in space

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I've heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Submarines would also outperform tanks in space.

Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can't link the xkcd because it's in a physical book.