43
[Video] Private business jet slams into a roadway with 9 people aboard (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 hour ago by to c/crazyfuckingvideos@lemmy.world
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

alternative video upload

source

all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 39 minutes ago

This is the first time I see a real airplane crash, and not some CGI simulation, the sheer speed of that aircraft is crazy to witness.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 4 points 39 minutes ago (1 child)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 10 points 1 hour ago (25 children)

    We're not marking death videos with NSFW these days?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

    Is it NSFW? There's no gore, no nudity, and no swearing. The title and community already state it's not exactly feel good but I don't see anything that you wouldn't see in any Marvel movie.

    Some servers (including the one I'm on just now) don't show anything tagged as NSFW, as an easy means of complying with stupid internet laws. Using the NSFW tag as a catch all term for anything you may not want to see then censors large amounts of content.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 59 minutes ago* (4 children)

    Yes watching this video knowing that 9 people have died upon impact makes this a death video.

    What's so wrong with erring on the side of caution and putting NSFW or a CW up?

    The title and community already state it’s not exactly feel good but I don’t see anything that you wouldn’t see in any Marvel movie.

    Just because you are desensitized to watching death doesn't mean the rest of us are.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 58 minutes ago (3 children)

    CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 57 minutes ago (2 children)

    Maybe death videos shouldn't be pushed so easily into people's timelines. Let people choose to watch it if they want.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 47 minutes ago (1 child)

    Let people choose to watch it if they want.

    Right back at you.

    This video was one of the top stories on the BBC's website today and I'm sure many other news websites around the world. It was "censored" by pausing for 1 second at the point of collision but otherwise it was the exact same video.

    If the BBC are putting it on their front page it's unlikely to be NSFW.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 44 minutes ago

    If the BBC are putting it on their front page it’s unlikely to be NSFW.

    Yeah defending the BBC is always the right move lol

    I still think death videos should be opt in and not pushed to everyone's front page without any warning or censoring.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 56 minutes ago (16 children)

    Question is, why are we marking videos NSFW when there's nothing to it. I've seen many.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 56 minutes ago (15 children)

    Not everyone enjoys watching others die.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 51 minutes ago (14 children)

    But you didn't actually see anyone die. You know it from news reports. Also I'm not referring to this video. I just think the NSFW label is overused and abused in terms of click-baiting.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 49 minutes ago (13 children)

    Fine, then throw a CW at least.

    You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 28 minutes ago (10 children)

    The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 26 minutes ago (9 children)

    And the rules request a CW when applicable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 20 minutes ago (8 children)

    And that's not what you asked for.

    I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 19 minutes ago* (7 children)

    And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck?

    Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind.

    My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 18 minutes ago (6 children)

    No you didn't?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 18 minutes ago (5 children)

    Edited.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 16 minutes ago (4 children)

    How was I impolite?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 13 minutes ago (3 children)

    I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it.

    That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 minutes ago (2 children)

    Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW.

    If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 4 points 31 minutes ago

    Who was on it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

    Wild, that small car looks like it was caught up in it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    The white car was not hit, it was actually much further back than it appears in the video. In some of the aftermath pictures, you can see it survived. It was definitely damaged by the shockwave but not directly hit. No one on the ground was killed, as far as I know.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •