▲ 84 ▼ [Video] Private business jet slams into a roadway with 9 people aboard (i.imgur.com) submitted 4 hours ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/crazyfuckingvideos@lemmy.world 57 comments fedilink hide all child comments alternative video upload source
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 hours ago (32 children) We're not marking death videos with NSFW these days? permalink fedilink source hideshow 32 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 26 points 4 hours ago (9 children) Is it NSFW? There's no gore, no nudity, and no swearing. The title and community already state it's not exactly feel good but I don't see anything that you wouldn't see in any Marvel movie. Some servers (including the one I'm on just now) don't show anything tagged as NSFW, as an easy means of complying with stupid internet laws. Using the NSFW tag as a catch all term for anything you may not want to see then censors large amounts of content. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago* (7 children) Yes watching this video knowing that 9 people have died upon impact makes this a death video. What's so wrong with erring on the side of caution and putting NSFW or a CW up? The title and community already state it’s not exactly feel good but I don’t see anything that you wouldn’t see in any Marvel movie. Just because you are desensitized to watching death doesn't mean the rest of us are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 14 points 4 hours ago (6 children) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 hours ago (5 children) Maybe death videos shouldn't be pushed so easily into people's timelines. Let people choose to watch it if they want. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Let people choose to watch it if they want. Right back at you. This video was one of the top stories on the BBC's website today and I'm sure many other news websites around the world. It was "censored" by pausing for 1 second at the point of collision but otherwise it was the exact same video. If the BBC are putting it on their front page it's unlikely to be NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (2 children) If the BBC are putting it on their front page it’s unlikely to be NSFW. Yeah defending the BBC is always the right move lol I still think death videos should be opt in and not pushed to everyone's front page without any warning or censoring. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Tbf the title makes it quite clear, but the best compromise is a CW so the user can make the call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago While I agree with the sentiment, no one was forced to watch this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] moth@anarchist.nexus -1 points 1 hour ago Some servers (including the one I’m on just now) don’t show anything tagged as NSFW that's a problem with your server, and not one the rest of fedi should have to accommodate. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (18 children) Question is, why are we marking videos NSFW when there's nothing to it. I've seen many. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 hours ago (17 children) Not everyone enjoys watching others die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 1 point 33 minutes ago Then don't watch a video labelled plane crash? permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (15 children) But you didn't actually see anyone die. You know it from news reports. Also I'm not referring to this video. I just think the NSFW label is overused and abused in terms of click-baiting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (14 children) Fine, then throw a CW at least. You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 3 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children) Then don’t look for the ATC communication with the airplane. That’s NSFL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 hours ago (1 child) No shit. I didn't listen to it on purpose. I did read the transcript. With this type of topic, we should be giving people the choice to opt in to watching it by putting a CW or NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 2 hours ago "Private jet slams into roadway with 9 people on board" not enough warning? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 26 points 4 hours ago (9 children) Is it NSFW? There's no gore, no nudity, and no swearing. The title and community already state it's not exactly feel good but I don't see anything that you wouldn't see in any Marvel movie. Some servers (including the one I'm on just now) don't show anything tagged as NSFW, as an easy means of complying with stupid internet laws. Using the NSFW tag as a catch all term for anything you may not want to see then censors large amounts of content. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago* (7 children) Yes watching this video knowing that 9 people have died upon impact makes this a death video. What's so wrong with erring on the side of caution and putting NSFW or a CW up? The title and community already state it’s not exactly feel good but I don’t see anything that you wouldn’t see in any Marvel movie. Just because you are desensitized to watching death doesn't mean the rest of us are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 14 points 4 hours ago (6 children) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 hours ago (5 children) Maybe death videos shouldn't be pushed so easily into people's timelines. Let people choose to watch it if they want. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Let people choose to watch it if they want. Right back at you. This video was one of the top stories on the BBC's website today and I'm sure many other news websites around the world. It was "censored" by pausing for 1 second at the point of collision but otherwise it was the exact same video. If the BBC are putting it on their front page it's unlikely to be NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (2 children) If the BBC are putting it on their front page it’s unlikely to be NSFW. Yeah defending the BBC is always the right move lol I still think death videos should be opt in and not pushed to everyone's front page without any warning or censoring. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Tbf the title makes it quite clear, but the best compromise is a CW so the user can make the call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago While I agree with the sentiment, no one was forced to watch this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] moth@anarchist.nexus -1 points 1 hour ago Some servers (including the one I’m on just now) don’t show anything tagged as NSFW that's a problem with your server, and not one the rest of fedi should have to accommodate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago* (7 children) Yes watching this video knowing that 9 people have died upon impact makes this a death video. What's so wrong with erring on the side of caution and putting NSFW or a CW up? The title and community already state it’s not exactly feel good but I don’t see anything that you wouldn’t see in any Marvel movie. Just because you are desensitized to watching death doesn't mean the rest of us are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 14 points 4 hours ago (6 children) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 hours ago (5 children) Maybe death videos shouldn't be pushed so easily into people's timelines. Let people choose to watch it if they want. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Let people choose to watch it if they want. Right back at you. This video was one of the top stories on the BBC's website today and I'm sure many other news websites around the world. It was "censored" by pausing for 1 second at the point of collision but otherwise it was the exact same video. If the BBC are putting it on their front page it's unlikely to be NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (2 children) If the BBC are putting it on their front page it’s unlikely to be NSFW. Yeah defending the BBC is always the right move lol I still think death videos should be opt in and not pushed to everyone's front page without any warning or censoring. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Tbf the title makes it quite clear, but the best compromise is a CW so the user can make the call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago While I agree with the sentiment, no one was forced to watch this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 14 points 4 hours ago (6 children) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 hours ago (5 children) Maybe death videos shouldn't be pushed so easily into people's timelines. Let people choose to watch it if they want. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Let people choose to watch it if they want. Right back at you. This video was one of the top stories on the BBC's website today and I'm sure many other news websites around the world. It was "censored" by pausing for 1 second at the point of collision but otherwise it was the exact same video. If the BBC are putting it on their front page it's unlikely to be NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (2 children) If the BBC are putting it on their front page it’s unlikely to be NSFW. Yeah defending the BBC is always the right move lol I still think death videos should be opt in and not pushed to everyone's front page without any warning or censoring. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Tbf the title makes it quite clear, but the best compromise is a CW so the user can make the call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago While I agree with the sentiment, no one was forced to watch this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 hours ago (5 children) Maybe death videos shouldn't be pushed so easily into people's timelines. Let people choose to watch it if they want. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Let people choose to watch it if they want. Right back at you. This video was one of the top stories on the BBC's website today and I'm sure many other news websites around the world. It was "censored" by pausing for 1 second at the point of collision but otherwise it was the exact same video. If the BBC are putting it on their front page it's unlikely to be NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (2 children) If the BBC are putting it on their front page it’s unlikely to be NSFW. Yeah defending the BBC is always the right move lol I still think death videos should be opt in and not pushed to everyone's front page without any warning or censoring. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Tbf the title makes it quite clear, but the best compromise is a CW so the user can make the call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago While I agree with the sentiment, no one was forced to watch this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Let people choose to watch it if they want. Right back at you. This video was one of the top stories on the BBC's website today and I'm sure many other news websites around the world. It was "censored" by pausing for 1 second at the point of collision but otherwise it was the exact same video. If the BBC are putting it on their front page it's unlikely to be NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (2 children) If the BBC are putting it on their front page it’s unlikely to be NSFW. Yeah defending the BBC is always the right move lol I still think death videos should be opt in and not pushed to everyone's front page without any warning or censoring. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Tbf the title makes it quite clear, but the best compromise is a CW so the user can make the call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (2 children) If the BBC are putting it on their front page it’s unlikely to be NSFW. Yeah defending the BBC is always the right move lol I still think death videos should be opt in and not pushed to everyone's front page without any warning or censoring. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Tbf the title makes it quite clear, but the best compromise is a CW so the user can make the call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Tbf the title makes it quite clear, but the best compromise is a CW so the user can make the call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yep, that's the only point I was trying to make. Thanks for getting it! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago While I agree with the sentiment, no one was forced to watch this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] moth@anarchist.nexus -1 points 1 hour ago Some servers (including the one I’m on just now) don’t show anything tagged as NSFW that's a problem with your server, and not one the rest of fedi should have to accommodate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redbrick@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (18 children) Question is, why are we marking videos NSFW when there's nothing to it. I've seen many. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 hours ago (17 children) Not everyone enjoys watching others die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 1 point 33 minutes ago Then don't watch a video labelled plane crash? permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (15 children) But you didn't actually see anyone die. You know it from news reports. Also I'm not referring to this video. I just think the NSFW label is overused and abused in terms of click-baiting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (14 children) Fine, then throw a CW at least. You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 3 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 hours ago (17 children) Not everyone enjoys watching others die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 1 point 33 minutes ago Then don't watch a video labelled plane crash? permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (15 children) But you didn't actually see anyone die. You know it from news reports. Also I'm not referring to this video. I just think the NSFW label is overused and abused in terms of click-baiting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (14 children) Fine, then throw a CW at least. You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 3 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 1 point 33 minutes ago Then don't watch a video labelled plane crash? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redbrick@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (15 children) But you didn't actually see anyone die. You know it from news reports. Also I'm not referring to this video. I just think the NSFW label is overused and abused in terms of click-baiting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (14 children) Fine, then throw a CW at least. You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 3 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (14 children) Fine, then throw a CW at least. You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 3 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 3 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 hours ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 hours ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redbrick@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children) Then don’t look for the ATC communication with the airplane. That’s NSFL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 hours ago (1 child) No shit. I didn't listen to it on purpose. I did read the transcript. With this type of topic, we should be giving people the choice to opt in to watching it by putting a CW or NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 2 hours ago "Private jet slams into roadway with 9 people on board" not enough warning? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 hours ago (1 child) No shit. I didn't listen to it on purpose. I did read the transcript. With this type of topic, we should be giving people the choice to opt in to watching it by putting a CW or NSFW. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 2 hours ago "Private jet slams into roadway with 9 people on board" not enough warning? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 2 hours ago "Private jet slams into roadway with 9 people on board" not enough warning? permalink fedilink source parent