▲ 69 ▼ [Video] Private business jet slams into a roadway with 9 people aboard (i.imgur.com) submitted 3 hours ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/crazyfuckingvideos@lemmy.world 52 comments fedilink hide all child comments alternative video upload source
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 hours ago (16 children) Not everyone enjoys watching others die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] redbrick@lemmy.world -4 points 2 hours ago (15 children) But you didn't actually see anyone die. You know it from news reports. Also I'm not referring to this video. I just think the NSFW label is overused and abused in terms of click-baiting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (14 children) Fine, then throw a CW at least. You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 2 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 point 2 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redbrick@lemmy.world -4 points 2 hours ago (15 children) But you didn't actually see anyone die. You know it from news reports. Also I'm not referring to this video. I just think the NSFW label is overused and abused in terms of click-baiting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (14 children) Fine, then throw a CW at least. You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 2 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 point 2 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (14 children) Fine, then throw a CW at least. You don't need to dig your heels in on insisting people should watch this death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 2 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 point 2 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redbrick@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 2 hours ago (11 children) The title saying it's a video of a plane crashing isn't a warning enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 point 2 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (10 children) And the rules request a CW when applicable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 point 2 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 point 2 hours ago (9 children) And that's not what you asked for. I conceded CW is fair enough and you continued to argue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (8 children) And I thanked you at the end of our back and forth, upvoted you, and now you're back here nagging at me? What the fuck? Ah that was another user who was much more polite than you were. Nevermind. My original point still stands - this should have a CW or NSFW because it is a death video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (7 children) No you didn't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 hours ago (6 children) Edited. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago (5 children) How was I impolite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children) I wasn't arguing back about the CW when I maintained that, in my opinion, death videos shouldn't be pushed into people's timelines. You are arguing that people should be forced to watch this death video because the BBC shows a censored version of it. That you are digging in your heels and arguing that people should have death videos pushed into their social media feeds without a warning is at the very least impolite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? I said NSFW blocks content from being visible to many servers, implying it should only be used when the content truly fits the definition of NSFW. This is a distressing video, but not NSFW. If you don't want to risk seeing videos of this nature I think it's probably best you block this community. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children) Where did I say anybody should be forced to watch anything? Well the BBC showed an edited version, so it's totally okay to allow this on people's feeds without any warning at all /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child) CW fair enough, but NSFW blocks it from several servers erroneously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago Yes we already went through this, you didn't need to jump into a different conversation to tell me the exact same thing thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redbrick@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child) I agree, there should've been some warning at least. It is tragic and horrific. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago Thank you, that's the only point I was trying to make. permalink fedilink source parent