I know the word normies may have weird connotations, but I just mean that, regular everyday people.

I've been enjoying Lemmy a lot and even recommended it to a few close friends who are working in tech. But I would like Lemmy to be way bigger, maybe have those makefriends communities like reddit has, be it gaming friends, just for chatting, for voicecalls, etc etc...

But I also wonder, could growing Lemmy indiscriminately be a bad thing? As you relax filters and barriers to entry, yes, more people can come in, but I have a feeling the quality of the people might go down aswell.

Is a clique-like platform what Lemmy is supposed to be like? Or is it supposed to try and absorb as much users as possible and be just a user-managed user-owned reddit alternative with no ads and less censorship?

I believe the answer may lie somewhere in the middle, but I'd love to hear your thoughts on it, as I'm a total newbie on here.

(Also I understand private dms on Lemmy are not secure, but you can keep the idea of the "r4r" community and just drop a matrix or session link in dms, not perfect as the admins can be what username you sent out, but at least it ends there)

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 20 minutes ago

Lemmy already has all the issues that Big Social Media has except the profit and monetization drive expectation by a commercial management team. Bad mods, bots, whatever. The difference is that we’re still small enough via instances that it is possible to segregate truly problematic instances or users by other users or instance operators. So in that way we have an advantage, and IMO unless there are some dramatic changes in how the fediverse operates I think it makes it unattractive to the people seeking to commercialize and/or manipulate Social Media. While it’s not impossible for those changes, it’s just unlikely.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 55 minutes ago

    the nature of lemmy means there can be indiscriminate growth without the inherent issues that come with it. The real issue is that should lemmy grow really big, corporations will become interested. Maybe they see it as something to colonize and try to claim, maybe they see it as threat if they cant control it.

    That is what we need to be ready for, not the people that are unwittingly being oppressed by those corporations.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    I, for one, do not wish to see Eternal September ever again.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    I don't understand when people say "normies" this and "normies" that. What makes us any different than when we were on Reddit?

    How many people were actually even using Lemmy only before they were using Reddit? I rarely used it before but when they got real shitty, I decided to move here.

    So what does that even make me? What creed do I need to follow to be considered not a "normie"?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 4 hours ago

    The fediverse is about offering an alternative to the monopoly power and political control of the large corporate sites. The more people are here, the less control those have. That is a good thing and far more important than any kind of elitist snobbery people here like to indulge in.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

    I'd take "normies" any day over people who classify others as "normies".

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 6 points 4 hours ago

    Yes, because it will fail otherwise. If only Linux nerds and tankies hang out here, than every community is just a slightly differently flavored tankie/linux community, and we'll die on the vine. We want normies to see the value in the fediverse, because then they'll start to ask why they should be giving all their privacy to big corporations.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago
    [–] 1 point 2 hours ago
    [–] 49 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

    I don't see why we would want to gatekeep the fediverse. If more people decided to use it over centralized social media, I think that'd be a positive development.

    And as you know, the fediverse is far from homogeneous. I expect there will always be some very big general purpose "normie" instances like lemmy.world, and smaller, more niche ones for specific communities.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 92 points 8 hours ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 22 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

    If you hand made this one rn you are a pretty cool guy, but if you had it saved up and ready to use you're based.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (1 child)

    Just what do you think you are, mack?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    The benefits vastly outpace the negatives. More people.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    as long as we have enough options to curate our feeds it should be fine.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

    One thing late-stage Reddit really had going for it is that, for any niche topic or hobby, you could find a sizeable active community.

    I still have to visit that place from time to time, but I’d rather be on Lemmy.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (6 children)

    Depends. I wish there were more normal people here myself. Because I'm not an extremist looking to live in a hugbox and I enjoy diversity. I genuinely take joy in learning other people's thoughts and perspectives on topics when they are expressed in a peaceful and thoughtful way. But I'm in a minority.

    As for needing to 'grow userbase'. Not really, but if you want more content and more niches you need more users, plain and simple. Most folks here miss there niche communities from reddit.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 18 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

    You're asking this on .world, the normie instance. .world is the watered down version of lemmy.

    But to answer your question, yes, ideally all people should move to foss versions of corpo software, if only to devalue digital data trading and advertisement space. Yes that means more instances going further right wing, and some instances choosing to no longer federate with the larger, more 'normie' ones; but the overall good to society is worth the cost.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago (1 child)

    How can an instance be "watered down" if most of them federate? Does world block a lot of other instances?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    While .world does tend to block a lot of instances, watering down would in this case be a problem with over-federation. .world tends to host the most popular communities, which then is a self-feeding cycle that increasingly centralizes user share on .world, which then produces more content than native communities, then making .world communities more popular, and so on.

    It produces much more average (to American and Euro-centric tastes) posts, while also being the defacto instance/community for a particular topic. Watering down what could be much more specialized topic posting and discussions.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 7 hours ago

    A slow growth would be preferable at the moment. Getting Lemmy to be regularly used by at least 250k people would allow more niche communities to take off.

    I do not see a big problem regarding people feeling being drowned out by rising user count. There's always the possibility of going the way BeeHaw did, to curate the instances you want to federate with, allowing smaller, more isolated nodes to exist to provide safe spaces and to avoid context collapse .

  • source
  • I’d like to see more sensible liberals here to offset the extremism of the far-left crowd.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    If I may, I'd like to challenge the idea that "regular, everyday people" exist. Most everyone is deeply educated and passionate about something. Tech projects like Lemmy tend to start out by attracting people who are passionate about technology (for obvious reasons). That's fine and logical, but to lump everyone else into the category of "normies" is to discount the people who couldn't care less about tech but are instead experts in art, or history, or athletics, or any other dimension of human endeavor. People only become normies when they feel compelled to sand down the sharp edges of their passions in order to better fit in with others who have different passions, even as those others do the same.

    I hope that Lemmy never becomes a place for normies, not because people who aren't into tech get scared away, but because they feel safe and encouraged to be their own special kind of abnormal. Because they will hopefully find others who share their specific passion, but will at the very least find a community that celebrates and encourages passion in all its forms.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

    Cool. I live the most educated city in the USA by many standards.

    Most people who live here are educated nominally, but they are mostly passionate about TV shows and sports, or their uninformed political opinions. And even with the high level of education, 45%, or about 1 in 2 people, don't hold a college degree.

    Where are all these 'experts' you claim exist? I don't ever see them even in my own city. Now if I go the MFA, yeah I am much more likely to meet someone who has a passion/expertise for art, but the majority of folks that go there are not experts or passionate, they are just doing there for a 'thing to do' or they are a tourist.

    If I want to find experts on topics, you go to podcasts or youtubes or read books. You don't talk to people on the street. My barista isn't going to want to talk about the Dutch East India Company, the are going to want to talk about the Patriots game today. They probably have a BA or a MA even, but they probably aren't interested in talking about what they studied because to them college was just a thing they had to do because someone told them to do it and they just went through the motions of their education rather than had any passion or dedicated interest in their studies.

    I am not even making this up. Many people I have known here over the years have little to no interest in anything other than what is immediately application to their job or what they do for entertainment. I've met dozens of dozens of PhDs who don't have any passion or interest in their own work, other than the money it brings them to go travel or go to restaurants, and they only do those things based on what is trending on IG. They have no interest in Greek history, but they saw the pretty picture of the island with the white houses and they want to go to Greece now so they can also take the same selfie. And if I talk about Greek history in terms of my own interest of that topic, or that I studied Attic Greek for two years, I'm a straight up weirdo freak to them and they usually start in with the passive aggressive insults about why I 'would waste my time on useless stupid things like that'.

    I also grew up in a small rural town, where nobody was educated, and well, it was leagues leagues worse there. The only 'expertise' anyone had was again, focused on TV sports or Top20 pop music. Nobody I knew back then had any expertise or knowledge of anything outside of basic blue collar jobs that they mostly hated and resented.

    I especially remember halfway through graduate school, when I learned most of my cohort and most of my professors, didn't even like what they were doing. The image of a professor who has a deep passion for their work... is not most of the academic population. They just did it because 'they couldn't they of anything else to do and they got good grades'. They had no passion for their field, they just saw it as the path of least resistance for their lives. I remember my ethics professor telling me his true passion was playing guitar and tennis and he became an academic because his parents were both academics and it was the easiest thing for him to do, he was also utterly shocked that I came from uneducated hill folk and my parents were funding my PhD like his did.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 1 point 4 hours ago (1 child)

    Reddit doesn't have voice calls as far as I know, but I haven't paid close attention.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

    Sure, I think Lemmy could have an instance or two for the normies.
    And then a dozen or so for the weirdos.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›