Like come on, people are otraged about the most minor stuff, but somehoe can't be bothered to boycot or change the situation with convenience pricig, where same stuff you buy at a store is 10-20x the price per unit.

"Youre taking advantage of my tiredness, making me pay more of my hard-earned money for the privilege of being too tired to prepare my own food/drinks myself, essentially making me work more hours for having worked too many hours and being tired as a resilt of it. So: making me more tired for being tired already"

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 39 minutes ago

People make the choice to buy overpriced coffee at places like Starbucks. The excuse "I'm too tired to make my own coffee" is just ridiculous.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 24 minutes ago (1 child)

    Why would I be outraged at things I can easily avoid if I want to? If I wanted to complain about prices it'd be at spring events and concerts. I can typically buy a 6 pack for the cost of 1 beer.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 32 minutes ago

    I can understand a service getting more expensive at certain times as demand increases.

    Has the price changed more for me than someone else?

    Did the price change after my decision to purchase?

    These would make me angry.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 51 minutes ago

    I live rurally (no Starbucks), but recently had to catch a train from Edinburgh for the second leg of a family holiday. It was delayed by an hour and was raining, so we went into the nearby Starbucks. 2 small hot chocolates for the kids and 1 coffee for my wife and I was down £23. I was caught in the slipstream and stressed so didn't have time to process how much this would cost. We could have got a bag of snacks and drinks for the journey for half that. Robbing bastards.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

    Time is money.

    It's not like expensive convenience has a monopoly. If you don't want to pay more, do it yourself.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    Exactly. I'm mostly amazed at how widespread it is, because damn that's a lot of people paying inflated prices I never would.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    Even if every person prepared their own food and drinks 99% of the time we'd still have restaurants and coffee shops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Mostly with convenience pricing I'm thinking about things like how a convenience store can be next to a supermarket and charge you a 20% markup on the exact same item, and people pay because they can't be bothered going into the grocery.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 2 hours ago

    I boycott things all the time. I also have friends who seem to not care at all. One of my friends considers herself really politically minded, but still eats at McDonald's, gets her daily Starbucks, orders on Amazon, shops and target and uses ChatGPT as her therapist. I've tried to point out the irony, but she gets incredibly defensive. I think some people don't care about anything but convenience. In this day and age, with social media, it made everyone the star of their own personal movie in their head. If things don't directly impact them, even if they like to talk the talk, they're not willing to walk the walk.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    One possible factor is the fact that some people call it “convenience pricing”. That phrase is doing a lot of psychological work. If we called it something like “surveillance pricing” or “extractive pricing”, then maybe we would be closer to outrage.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 hours ago

    They’re not talking about surveillance pricing. They’re talking about selling one roll of toilet paper out of a package but for the same cost as the whole 12 pack. Surveillance pricing is using your individual behavior to change the price of the product for just you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    There must be an upper limit for how many things an individual can feel outraged about simultaneously. For me that limit is zero.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment