In what world is anything over a second acceptable. All launchers are otherly horrible.
post

My "Hello, World!" script boots approximately 18000x faster than the Epic launcher.
The difference in features between the two is about the same as it is between Steam and the Epic launcher.
As Steam has been extremely slow to launch for quite some time now, anybody want to take a stab at why it took an Epic Games taunt for them to take care of it?
You think they only waited for epic to drop an update as if they monitor them from the inside?
That's a next level conspiracy theory lol
Has it? I never noticed. It always been fast for me. 2 seconds is too long?
For me it regularly takes (took? haven't used Steam after the update) 15+ seconds
Maybe it's because I'm opted into the beta, so I'm always downloading updates. But it always takes a couple of minutes to launch from scratch for me and my gaming PC is no slouch.
But once I launch it, I leave it up, I never close it, so it's never just running in the background waiting for me to pop it up again.
From what others said, this has been in the beta. Epic tried to beat this release just to be able to technically say they were faster for a day.
https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/detail/710037059469839721
The actual update post from Valve. Why is it not linked in the article? The notes are huge, with many things improved. Off course one of the improvements would probably lead to better loading times. This isn't a response to Epic Games, this is a main update developed way before.
Avoid stealing focus when the Steam main window opens, if another window was activated during startup/login.
Holy hell finally. This has annoyed me for so damn long.
Honestly, that makes it even better to me. Here’s Epic bragging about beating Steam in some way meanwhile Valve’s like “here’s a little something we’ve been working on for a while. No biggy.”
And to add to that this was already part of the Beta update from 9. September
Who the fuck cares if the fast launcher is a piece of crap with a fraction of features needed for a good library and storefront?
Tim Sweeny: "Is there anything we are better at than steam? Literally anything? I will take anything we can market, no matter how pathetic and desperate it seems."
Going forward we optimize for "restore from system tray" time. That'll be a game changer.
Patch notes: "we didn't think anyone really gave a shit, but fuck epic"
It didn't really bother me before, but it has been kind of slow to start for a long time. Bad enough for me to notice that's it's slow, but not bad enough to feel the need to complain about it.
Now it only takes about 6 seconds for me which is perfectly fine. As someone who only runs Steam when I'm about to play a game through it, it's a very noticeable improvement!
I open steam exactly once, then never again until I restart my computer. Why would this even matter.
I don't get this mentality. Every little performance optimization matters. It might save 1s or even less for you, but coupled with hundreds of thousands of users, it saves a some amount of CPU time.
This is why competition is good. Being blindly loyal to a brand and defending their shit only benefits the companies.
Because not everyone is you?
Also devices like steam deck and steam machine.
As pathetic as Epic is, this is a strong demonstration of why monopolies are bad and competition is needed.
Its not a random update in response to Epic.
The September 9 beta branch mentioned improved start up time.
Steam quietly improves itself without making big announcements calling out other companies to try to get attention. Its why it has been working on stuff like Proton, steamos, and hardware.
This isn't a case of competition though; Valve didn't slip in a last second speedup to get back at Epic, the patch had already been built and tested and just happened to come out a day after Epic's did.
Recently, Epic Games decided to tackle that reputation head-on by unveiling a preview version of its rebuilt Epic Games Launcher V2, which the company proudly noted was developed with heavy AI assistance. Basically, a decade of working on it themselves, no luck, but they got the AI vibes to help and it did a better job… Not the brag they seem to think it is, but let’s roll with it for now.
Damn, do you need something for that burn?
Both of them are using a form of embedded Chromium to display the store, no? Is this really worth competing about then? xD
The Starcraft launcher goes under 1 second on a pentium 1, there.
Both of them are using a form of embedded Chromium to display the store, no?
Yes, but only for the store I think. There are also other game views you already own and other features too that is not displaying a store.
Huh, I guess competition is good for motivating improvement. Even when you're competing against the kid that eats paste.

top 50 comments