Without any flashy marketing campaigns or social media fanfare, Valve rolled out a routine Steam Client update containing a very simple line in the patch notes: “Improved Steam Client startup performance.”

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 4 hours ago

In what world is anything over a second acceptable. All launchers are otherly horrible.

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 51 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    My "Hello, World!" script boots approximately 18000x faster than the Epic launcher.

    The difference in features between the two is about the same as it is between Steam and the Epic launcher.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (6 children)

    As Steam has been extremely slow to launch for quite some time now, anybody want to take a stab at why it took an Epic Games taunt for them to take care of it?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    Has it? I never noticed. It always been fast for me. 2 seconds is too long?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 hours ago

    Maybe it's because I'm opted into the beta, so I'm always downloading updates. But it always takes a couple of minutes to launch from scratch for me and my gaming PC is no slouch.

    But once I launch it, I leave it up, I never close it, so it's never just running in the background waiting for me to pop it up again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 86 points 19 hours ago* (5 children)

    https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/detail/710037059469839721

    The actual update post from Valve. Why is it not linked in the article? The notes are huge, with many things improved. Off course one of the improvements would probably lead to better loading times. This isn't a response to Epic Games, this is a main update developed way before.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

    Avoid stealing focus when the Steam main window opens, if another window was activated during startup/login.

    Holy hell finally. This has annoyed me for so damn long.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 16 hours ago

    Who the fuck cares if the fast launcher is a piece of crap with a fraction of features needed for a good library and storefront?

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 19 hours ago (13 children)

    Tim Sweeny: "Is there anything we are better at than steam? Literally anything? I will take anything we can market, no matter how pathetic and desperate it seems."

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 211 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    Patch notes: "we didn't think anyone really gave a shit, but fuck epic"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    It didn't really bother me before, but it has been kind of slow to start for a long time. Bad enough for me to notice that's it's slow, but not bad enough to feel the need to complain about it.

    Now it only takes about 6 seconds for me which is perfectly fine. As someone who only runs Steam when I'm about to play a game through it, it's a very noticeable improvement!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 153 points 23 hours ago (32 children)

    I open steam exactly once, then never again until I restart my computer. Why would this even matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    I don't get this mentality. Every little performance optimization matters. It might save 1s or even less for you, but coupled with hundreds of thousands of users, it saves a some amount of CPU time.

    This is why competition is good. Being blindly loyal to a brand and defending their shit only benefits the companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (30 replies)
    [–] 103 points 22 hours ago

    Epic: I Feel Bad For You

    Valve: I Don't Think About You At All

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 14 hours ago*

    EGS loads faster because there's fewer features to load.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

    As pathetic as Epic is, this is a strong demonstration of why monopolies are bad and competition is needed.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 17 hours ago*

    This isn't a case of competition though; Valve didn't slip in a last second speedup to get back at Epic, the patch had already been built and tested and just happened to come out a day after Epic's did.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)

    Recently, Epic Games decided to tackle that reputation head-on by unveiling a preview version of its rebuilt Epic Games Launcher V2, which the company proudly noted was developed with heavy AI assistance. Basically, a decade of working on it themselves, no luck, but they got the AI vibes to help and it did a better job… Not the brag they seem to think it is, but let’s roll with it for now.

    Damn, do you need something for that burn?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

    Both of them are using a form of embedded Chromium to display the store, no? Is this really worth competing about then? xD

    The Starcraft launcher goes under 1 second on a pentium 1, there.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    Both of them are using a form of embedded Chromium to display the store, no?

    Yes, but only for the store I think. There are also other game views you already own and other features too that is not displaying a store.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 24 points 20 hours ago*

    Huh, I guess competition is good for motivating improvement. Even when you're competing against the kid that eats paste.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›