top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 14 hours ago (1 child)

Yes, use all the tools we have but still learn math, science and critical thinking. Use best tool for the job and how to use it right.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago*

    I work in IT. Our apprentice students were complaining the other day about learning subnets the binary way. I laughed and told them, we all learn the concept. Then when we’re old and lazy we learn to spot the popular ones /32 /29 /24 /16 etc. For everything else there’s a subnet calculator

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    I don't know what kind of jackass clown schools you folks went to, but we were consistently told we would have calculators. It's just were required to understand the theory in full before using a solver.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    I always thought this was a bad argument anyway. The point of learning arithmetic was to develop your ability to reason and to learn study skills and habits. A similar argument could be you won't always have a car so you'd better learn to run. But I don't run because I'm worried I won't have transportation. I run/hike to stay fit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

    Teaching kids to do math without calculators is like teaching people to do carpentry without a measuring tape. It’s slower and less accurate for no real benefit. Before we had calculators, everyone used an abacus or a slide rule. Calculation aids have always been an integral part of math, and knowing how to properly apply them makes you better at math (faster, more accurate, deeper understanding). We literally developed computers in the first place so we could do less mental math because it is so unreliable.

    Why does the logic of technology/industry fall apart for calculators? I’ve never understood it. There’s no other field where we perceive “lack of tool use” to be an advantage.

    EDIT: It would be like practicing fingerpainting in art class because "you won't always have a brush in your pocket" Hell, why even learn to read when you won't always have a book in your pocket? Better not play basketball in gym class, you won't always have a ball in your pocket! It's just always been a totally goofy attitude. I didn't accept this illogical take as a child and I sure don't accept it now 😂

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I grew up thinking I was horrible at math... till it became abtract enough that calculations were rare...

    Turns out my handwriting is shit, and I cant manually calculate for my life. But if those two things are not a factor, I am really got at math.

    Also. I had a "computational methods" class in uni, where we had to do algorithms with a calculator.... almost failed. Then went out off of that field and became a programmer. Im fairly sure if that class was actually computer base I'd gotten a perfect score.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 16 hours ago

    I mean finger painting is taught to just know how to do it that way. There is merit to knowing how to do things with limited tools available. The basketball analogy falls flat though. that one is like doing math without numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    They said it to us, even as I'd go home to my father wearing this watch.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

    I come from a time when calculators were being used in high school and I have an older brother where they actually used slide rules. It was when the TI's came out and the school was 100% not ready for those.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    My generation was probably one of the last to have math teachers.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 22 hours ago

    While we heard it said, and more often the more specific realistic version was that you wouldn’t always have a calculator on the tests through college, there is a few more proper reasons that still apply. Knowing how the equations work, as well as that they exist. You can look them up and will probably build an excel spreadsheet at work but even using AI today it’s vital that you can check the work. It also effects your brain development. If you’re running calculations in your head while doing them by hand it develops parts of your brain and eventually lets you think in math terms. The effort required probably also does a good job of sorting people out of career paths. I don’t want planes flying around me that were “vibe calculated”

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    Don't forget "you need to be good at math if you want to work with computers."

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 child)

    They told us that for nursing school then it was all middle school level ratio and proportion (admittedly with multiple ratio steps like when you've ratioed the right volume of the dose but then you need to convert that to the gtt of your drip kit). The only real equations needed were three (maybe I'm forgetting one) that you could just memorize for the week then forget again until next semester. Two were °F to °C / °C to °F with one inverted ratio +/- the constant. The other one was BSA with two variables but you don't have to solve for one or the other they're both just measurements you get from the patient and plug in.

    ...but then you realize that the only acceptable score on that test is a 100% (some programs will drop you if you get anything less than a 100% on the drug dose test after two tries) and that what nursing school is actually looking for is both accuracy and precision. You're doing a relatively basic but fundamentally logical, and more importantly highly repetitive puzzle 25 times in a row in an hour and if you make even one error you fail. I had to create a whole specific mental technique to beat my ADHD into submission enough to 100% that test (honestly half of what nursing school taught me was ultimately ADHD / attention management techniques, which it turns out is actually also most of being a nurse). Like the EMR does basically all of the math these days but being aware of where my attention is and why and how to nudge it where it needs to be has been suuuper useful.

    Edit: BMI! That was the equation I was forgetting about. Weirdly it's mostly useful in population health but also if you're under a certain BMI on admission the EMR starts suggesting a diet consult every time I open that chart until I either document a reason to permanently override it or just put in the consult so that the dietician can immediately decide whether or not to start loading them full of protein shakes. Really important for the seniors if they go into the hospital with 0 chub they're probably not coming back out alive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Hmm... I think it was something like, "you need to be good at math if you want to be a computer programmer", and in some ways that remains true.

    I mean, you don't need to be good at your times tables to learn javascript, but there are lots of transferable skills.

    I'm playing around with some Geospatial data stuff presently, and the math involved is about as complex as it gets, but you don't really need to do the math just playing around with the data.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 10 points 23 hours ago

    I was told that employers wouldnt want me to need to look everything up, which was the argument against open book tests.

    Meanwhile, my job is BEGGING me to use Chatgpt instead of my expertise.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    Interestingly, this phrase was really only plausibly used for about 33 years - the time between the first fully electronic calculator and the first smartphone.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (18 children)

    I have always been wondering if the memory of this phrase is another example of the "Mandela Effect", like the Monopoly guy's monocle.

    It just sounds so plausible, as it is stylistically the kind of stuff that teachers often say and it fits so well as we all have first hand experience on how fast technology has progressed especially during the 00s.

    But on closer scrutiny it just doesn't make sense.

    And it was already pretty obvious to anyone really early that this wouldn't make sense.

    During my middle-school years in the 80s, things like calculator watches already were the hype (had one myself) and widespread enough for school to have to establish rules to cover those.
    Shortly after that, I remember credit-card-sized calculators that where intended to be put into your wallet to be common giveaways by banks.
    And compact GSM mobile phones started to become increasingly widespread from the mid 90s.

    I see only a tiny timespan that the phrase would have perhaps been plausible, maybe just ten or so years spanning from the early 70s to the early 80s.

    And I myself am pretty sure that I first heard the claim and the phrase itself in some relatively recent (last 10-15 years) online posts, but never before.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Teachers at my school in the early 00's were still saying it. One of the better maths teachers would add to it by asking if we really wanted to grow up to be stupid and unable to do such basic sums unaided.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    I totally believe you that you have this memory!

    But now take a step back and consider that each of those teachers you vividly remember saying the calculator phrase to you, must have had a mobile phone in their pockets, which at the time had exactly three apps presented prominently on the main screen: a calendar, an alarm clock and a calculator.
    So why would they have said such a thing to you?

    And still, you have that totally realistic and believable memory of it.

    Like I also have the vivid, colourful, and absolutely undeniable realistic memory of the "Fruit of the Loom" logo having featured a cornucopia when we were wearing this brand in school.

    I think the calculator remark memory being a Mandela-Effect artifact is not a totally unreasonable thing to suspect...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    had a mobile phone in their pockets, which at the time had exactly three apps

    At the time I was in school (90s to early 00s), cell phones were for making phone calls. There were no "apps." There was no texting, no camera, none of that. Smart phones came out the year I graduated high school. Before that, cell phones were not anywhere near as common as they are today. At a certain point, they were even a status symbol. My elementary school teachers definitely didn't have the money to afford something so fancy in the 90s.

    The closest thing I had as a kid was an "electronic organizer" with no phone/internet abilities. That had a calculator and a calendar, but it was more of a novelty and a toy - not something I relied on or would bring to school.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 23 hours ago

    Eh, "you're not always going to have your phone on you" was another thing that was said, and plenty of us now have jobs where we can't have/use a cell phone while working, so it's turned out to be pretty apt.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 23 hours ago*

    I was in elementary school ins the late 70s and early 80s. Second grade. Mrs. Anderson said it. And it made sense because the calculator at home was the size of a brick and you had to plug it into the wall with a power adapter. And it cost like $800 adjusted for inflation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 23 hours ago

    I am newgen enough that I was raised shittily with a cell phone that had a calculator on it. It sucked but it was there. And I was doing worst in math. Forgot which grade.

    Teacher dropped the line (different language), I went "I literally do have a calculator in my pocket" and pulled out my phone still running an "Are you sure you want to quit?"ed game of checkers with me literally doing random moves without understanding the game and still winning, then she went "well, what if you don't want to bring it, or forget it at home?", I dismissed it (but retrospectively she was right), and then I lost the argument with the teacher asking me how I would handle a social interaction with a store cashier.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    Hey, before you go start gaslighting strangers that their memories are false (I also remember hearing the phrase in school in the 80s), consider a few things:

    First, while calculator watches may have existed, I don't remember seeing them in my childhood. They weren't universal.

    Second, teachers are adults, kinda set in their ways. Brand-new 'toys' aren't going to change their thinking on a dime. I can very easily believe teachers continuing to use the phrase even after circumstances have changed (see also the other poster mentioning hearing it in the 00s).

    Third, the fact that you can "prove" the saying wrong with your arguments doesn't mean that all of our teachers have thought it through the way you did (and I think all of us have had teachers where the response to this debate would be "Quit talking back! Detention for you, buster!" instead of "Oh, yeah, interesting thought...").

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    From doing geometry in 12 year old classes in 2002, to algebra in 14 yr classes, our experience never called for offloading the math onto the calculator. Whenever I'm helping my son with math homework I try to ensure pencil on paper is the first step we exhaust before any magical math steps.

    It sounds like obvious old man get-off-my-lawn energy, but when I was growing up the kids running games on TI calculators were the ones who were curious and also tutored sufficiently to not have any problems with math.

    That was never me, of course. I was too broke and ignorant to have a TI-84 until college, and only used it in one math class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 21 hours ago

    Somewhere around 40?

    I goated the system. I wore one of those calculator watches.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    What generation are you? I was born in the early 90s and we got that in school

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 1 point 19 hours ago

    I was not dreaming about using numpy on the phone for doing compound interest calculations....

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›