I'm pretty sure this is backwards? SSRIs work because they are reuptake inhibitors, increasing the amount of serotonin available to receptor sites.

So it's more like "I have a bunch of serotonin that my receptors are begging for but my brain is just like nah you don't need that lemme take it from you lol tough it out"

I think. I'm not a chemist or a biologist. Just some barely educated depressed guy in the internet so I could be wrong

What can I say? I woke up this morning and chose violence 🤷‍♀️

Valid point! But then how do you refer to the data structure/architecture/model concept? Sometimes we want a concise term (like bittorrent or ActivityPub) for the abstraction

Nobody said it wasn't? But different models have different benefits and drawbacks?

See the link in my other replies for some examples of internal uses that still benefit from immutable, distributed ledgers.

Large organizations still have loss and risk from individual bad actors. Operating a central authority that validates every single transaction in a ledger, and validates ledger history and consistency, can be prohibitively complicated. A well designed blockchain implementation can resolve most of these issues.

A great example is a pharma/healthcare company that wants to manage medicine batch and expiration tracking, as well as distribution/patient assignment. With a traditional infrastructure every participant needs to phone home to a central authority. In a blockchain setup, peers can report ledger events one hop up and propagate it through the chain.

That's a very simple example but I hope it gets my point across

Here, I provided a bunch of examples months ago of other ways blockchain is being used: https://lemmy.world/post/36683795/19677963

Lol you're a judgemental prick. I have zero crypto because that shit is absolutely moronic.

It's like you talked to someone who supports nuclear power and responded "good luck with the nuclear bombs you definitely don't have, true believer"

Sounds like you just want to hate on shit you don't understand. Go on with your bad self though 👍

EDIT: LMAO from the article you linked they even point out that the tech itself isn't the problem, but the willingness of businesses to invest in the improvements (which is, like, an incredibly common problem in business that does not in any way make the tech bad)

Its plan to digitize global supply chains hasn’t received sufficient cooperation and support to remain viable.

That is the downside of corporate blockchain projects. They need everyone to share a mindset and commit to a long-term plan. Unfortunately, businesses face ever-changing conditions and financial problems. Few can warrant the cost of buying into such systems under the current market conditions.

You probably preach about how nuclear power is terrible, how if it were so great there would be more of it, and people sticking to coal is proof that coal power is better. 

Big brain you've got there 😂🫡

Critical mass is not required for internal systems. Not all implementations of blockchain are intended for public use.

I'm really tired of this. Blockchain. Is not. Crypto.

Here's the research I did for everyone four months ago: https://lemmy.world/post/36683795/19677963

I have a large number of examples in this comment from four months ago. Please read them: https://lemmy.world/post/36683795/19677963

You are making my point. Blockchain is not crypto. Blockchain can be useful in private, internal use cases (like a transaction ledger for bank branches) where trust is largely implicit.

sigh

Once again:

Blockchain is not synonymous with cryptomining

Blockchain does not require proof of work

Cryptocurrency and NFT grifting does not devalue blockchain as an immutable distributed ledger

I swear to god people just copy paste whatever makes them feel good without any effort at understanding

Perhaps that is the point: peer auditing instead of blind forwarding